I think we do disagree on how the Cancellara slow up worked
snoopcester Send a noteboard - 16/07/2010 11:32:52 AM
Schleck caught up midway through the stage, long before Cancellara held the peloton out of a bunch sprint in protest to the number of crashes that had occured earlier on. Any crashes that occur early in a flat stage are always recoverable, but ones at the start of a long climb late in a stage are not. But yes, luck plays the biggest part. If Schleck had fallen just before a climb Armstrong and co would have done the same thing to him or any other potential GC threat.
Cancellara got the bunch to slow down when Schleck fell, to allow him and the other fallen riders to catch up. That is a seperate even from what went on with the (non)sprint at the end of the stage. It is all pretty standard when someone contending for a high finish falls on a flat stage, unless it is in the last few kilometres but you seem to miss it out in your account.
With regards to Armstrong, I remembered since about the time Ullrich waited for him after he fell on a climb. Armstrong thanked him by sprinting up past him before the slower accelerating Ullrich had a chance to get back up to full speed and adjust back to racing.
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
/Tour de France: Regarding yesterday
- 12/07/2010 10:22:45 AM
473 Views
I hate him!
- 12/07/2010 11:56:50 AM
420 Views
Cheater? When did he cheat?
- 12/07/2010 12:11:37 PM
400 Views
1 day, when his team stopped the sprint, cause he fell.
- 12/07/2010 12:14:45 PM
345 Views
Ah. I don't see that as cheating since people could have sprinted if they'd wanted.
- 12/07/2010 12:40:35 PM
389 Views
Not really...
- 12/07/2010 12:47:25 PM
361 Views
This is woefully uninformed
- 12/07/2010 02:38:35 PM
394 Views
I'm not sure that is quite right either
- 12/07/2010 02:57:56 PM
406 Views
Not sure I see your point
- 15/07/2010 10:10:32 PM
399 Views
I think we do disagree on how the Cancellara slow up worked
- 16/07/2010 11:32:52 AM
396 Views
Re: Ah. I don't see that as cheating since people could have sprinted if they'd wanted.
- 12/07/2010 05:31:38 PM
371 Views
Re: Ah. I don't see that as cheating since people could have sprinted if they'd wanted.
- 13/07/2010 12:45:11 PM
362 Views
Re: Ah. I don't see that as cheating since people could have sprinted if they'd wanted.
- 13/07/2010 12:51:03 PM
370 Views
Re: Ah. I don't see that as cheating since people could have sprinted if they'd wanted.
- 13/07/2010 12:54:29 PM
402 Views
Re: Ah. I don't see that as cheating since people could have sprinted if they'd wanted.
- 13/07/2010 12:56:41 PM
416 Views
Re: Ah. I don't see that as cheating since people could have sprinted if they'd wanted.
- 13/07/2010 01:14:22 PM
373 Views