Active Users:1132 Time:23/11/2024 04:08:57 AM
Re: 1 day, when his team stopped the sprint, cause he fell. Camilla Send a noteboard - 13/07/2010 12:11:02 PM
Who else is thrilled Andy Schleck won?


May that bony idiot burn! Stupid cheater!

He was 3 minutes behind.

But when the same thing happend the next day with Lance they didn't care.

I don't like cheaters.


When Andy Schleck fell, that was not due to any fault of his own. He was caught up in other people's screw-up, and it was on a flat day. It is an unwritten rule of Tour de France that the other overall favourites don't take advantage of things like that. It is one of the main reasons I like the sport. The lack of a sprint didn't have much effect on his position. He is not after the points, he is after the time.

When Lance Armstrong fell, it was (at least the main time) his own fault, and it happened in a completely different stage. People cannot wait in the mountains.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
/Tour de France: Regarding yesterday - 12/07/2010 10:22:45 AM 481 Views
Me! - 12/07/2010 10:26:52 AM 398 Views
Re: Me! - 12/07/2010 05:30:23 PM 370 Views
Re: Me! - 13/07/2010 12:44:01 PM 398 Views
I hate him! - 12/07/2010 11:56:50 AM 432 Views
Cheater? When did he cheat? - 12/07/2010 12:11:37 PM 413 Views
1 day, when his team stopped the sprint, cause he fell. - 12/07/2010 12:14:45 PM 353 Views
Ah. I don't see that as cheating since people could have sprinted if they'd wanted. - 12/07/2010 12:40:35 PM 400 Views
Not really... - 12/07/2010 12:47:25 PM 371 Views
This is woefully uninformed - 12/07/2010 02:38:35 PM 406 Views
I'm not sure that is quite right either - 12/07/2010 02:57:56 PM 418 Views
Not sure I see your point - 15/07/2010 10:10:32 PM 413 Views
I think we do disagree on how the Cancellara slow up worked - 16/07/2010 11:32:52 AM 406 Views
Ahhh we are talking about different falls! - 20/07/2010 02:26:23 PM 402 Views
Re: 1 day, when his team stopped the sprint, cause he fell. - 13/07/2010 12:11:02 PM 395 Views
Re: I hate him! - 12/07/2010 05:30:47 PM 378 Views

Reply to Message