I do realize that the concept of a road has been around for a while. Regardless though, the standard "road" in the US is designed for an automobile. It cannot support cars and bikes both efficiently AND safely. The car either slows down to the speed of the bike for the duration of their similar route, or else one of the parties must exit the given roadway. The bike has to go off the road, possibly hitting rocks, holes, etc, or the car must cross the center lane to whatever extent, risking collision with cars on the other side.
Most modern roads are not designed for bikes, and, thus, it's my opinion that bikes shouldn't travel on those.
Most modern roads are not designed for bikes, and, thus, it's my opinion that bikes shouldn't travel on those.
The problem is that a bike is MUCH cheaper than a car, so if a person can't afford a car but can afford a bike then they're going to go to work (school, uni, wherever) on that. And they'll have to use the roads that aren't sensible for them.
Completely agree with you about the need for better infrastructure & set up for bikes. I disagree that this means that bikes shouldn't be on the roads that exist. Needs must & all.
You must unlearn what you have learned.
I got screamed at by a motorist while riding my bicycle today
28/06/2010 05:44:45 AM
- 1662 Views
Ummm
28/06/2010 06:01:19 AM
- 1278 Views
Let me guess. You live in an American suburb. *NM*
28/06/2010 06:12:24 AM
- 546 Views
Yeah, the "sport" part gives that away even more than everything else... *NM*
28/06/2010 08:06:03 AM
- 559 Views
seriously, you think people didn't use bikes as transportation anymore!! *NM*
28/06/2010 08:26:36 AM
- 642 Views
That was offensive to cyclists. People who think like you are why so many of us die. *NM*
28/06/2010 08:28:24 AM
- 622 Views
Now that I've calmed down a bit, I'm going to actually address your points.
28/06/2010 12:16:10 PM
- 1401 Views
hey now!
28/06/2010 01:18:16 PM
- 935 Views
I understand that what he said offended you
28/06/2010 04:11:57 PM
- 1163 Views
You're right, I was stereotyping and getting a little ad hominem. I'm sorry. *NM*
29/06/2010 08:33:20 AM
- 600 Views
My social capital at this site is pretty low, so I don't mind admitting that I agree with MK.
28/06/2010 04:12:42 PM
- 1035 Views
Re: My social capital at this site is pretty low, so I don't mind admitting that I agree with MK.
28/06/2010 06:27:42 PM
- 1081 Views
This point:
28/06/2010 06:37:32 PM
- 1140 Views
Not in the United States.
28/06/2010 07:25:56 PM
- 1130 Views
Highways are, of course, a different matter.
28/06/2010 07:32:50 PM
- 1088 Views
I know
28/06/2010 07:34:04 PM
- 1198 Views
Re: I know
28/06/2010 08:27:04 PM
- 1051 Views
Re: I know
28/06/2010 08:38:14 PM
- 1178 Views
It is illegal to drive on the shoulder.
29/06/2010 09:43:40 AM
- 1169 Views
i'm pretty sure bicycles are banned from almost all highways, regardless of access
29/06/2010 02:34:00 PM
- 957 Views
Maybe I should have said "modern roads."
28/06/2010 08:20:55 PM
- 1142 Views
Perhaps.
28/06/2010 08:36:15 PM
- 1193 Views
I think we just disagree on the necessity is all.
28/06/2010 09:00:44 PM
- 965 Views
Yes, because that cyclist is SUCH a hazard to you in your car.
29/06/2010 01:03:05 AM
- 1118 Views
The central issue is people.
29/06/2010 09:52:22 AM
- 1097 Views
you keep talking about cyclists on highways as if it applied to all roads.
29/06/2010 02:37:31 PM
- 1155 Views
There are TWO equally important points there:
30/06/2010 01:15:17 AM
- 1157 Views
then why are you arguing with me? I said that the central issue is people being stupid. *NM*
01/07/2010 05:59:23 AM
- 567 Views
Two words: Public Transportation
30/06/2010 03:32:05 AM
- 1127 Views
...doesn't exist or is completely dysfunctional in a lot of places. *NM*
30/06/2010 03:57:26 AM
- 584 Views
Re: Two words: Public Transportation
30/06/2010 08:43:51 AM
- 1303 Views
Re: Two words: Public Transportation
01/07/2010 08:05:37 AM
- 1132 Views
You can't be serious. If you do think that's always (not just sometimes) a viable option, then...
30/06/2010 09:20:03 AM
- 1078 Views
My city doesn't have ANY. not even shuttle buses. *NM*
01/07/2010 06:00:22 AM
- 628 Views
Re: My city doesn't have ANY. not even shuttle buses.
01/07/2010 08:08:02 AM
- 1103 Views
Outside of a highly urbanized area, I surmise. The entirety of the US is not like the East Coast. *NM*
02/07/2010 02:11:01 AM
- 623 Views
Despite your subject line, I'm glad to see that we agree with each other more than MK and I do.
29/06/2010 10:13:29 AM
- 1186 Views
Get your head on straight, you silly cyclist
01/07/2010 08:02:58 AM
- 982 Views
He never said there were no buses in our city. He said that, as a student, he can't afford them. *NM*
01/07/2010 08:42:47 AM
- 579 Views
I'd say most urban areas have few roads with speed limits above 50 km/h (30mph)
01/07/2010 10:35:20 AM
- 1030 Views
Now now, there's no need to be rude.
02/07/2010 12:04:16 AM
- 1200 Views
Re: Now now, there's no need to be rude.
04/07/2010 05:53:01 PM
- 982 Views
That's always upsetting. You just have to remember that some people are simply arseholes, and...
28/06/2010 11:41:22 AM
- 1021 Views
Re: I got screamed at by a motorist while riding my bicycle today
28/06/2010 03:25:22 PM
- 940 Views
Are they supposed to use sidewalks anywhere? *NM*
28/06/2010 04:58:50 PM
- 527 Views
In Sweden we often have combined bike and walking paths a few meters to the side of the road
28/06/2010 06:22:40 PM
- 981 Views
Not sure, but
28/06/2010 06:53:14 PM
- 986 Views
Thankfully I live in a very bike-friendly city, though this sort of thing has still happened to me. *NM*
28/06/2010 07:56:59 PM
- 598 Views
I'm so glad I actually READ what you said before responding.
29/06/2010 09:16:25 AM
- 1115 Views
?? I thought it was matter of COURSE that bikes weren't allowed on the highway
29/06/2010 09:27:06 AM
- 1067 Views
Should be, but it's not.
29/06/2010 09:59:35 AM
- 1059 Views
Question for you.
29/06/2010 10:22:13 AM
- 908 Views
the law says they have to to ride in single file as close to curb as is practical
29/06/2010 03:31:55 PM
- 972 Views