Active Users:391 Time:28/04/2025 10:41:26 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
As the direct quote I provided proves, it was not only based on the 14th. *NM* Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 30/06/2010 01:09:22 AM
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
SCOTUS - Affirms Gun Rights Nationwide..... trzaska2000 - 28/06/2010 04:47:03 PM 455 Views
A good day for liberty. LiterateDog - 28/06/2010 04:55:01 PM 171 Views
Yeah, pretty much SilverWarder - 28/06/2010 05:19:15 PM 174 Views
Great point - whether you agreed with the 2nd amendment or not, its intent is clear..... trzaska2000 - 28/06/2010 06:19:08 PM 151 Views
"well regulated militia" *NM* Ghavrel - 28/06/2010 11:56:54 PM 43 Views
Read the dissents, they don't focus on "well regulated militia"..... trzaska2000 - 29/06/2010 04:28:06 AM 136 Views
Um, no. Ghavrel - 29/06/2010 06:05:37 AM 147 Views
Uh, yes......read the dissents entirely - it's about the 14th amendment. *NM* trzaska2000 - 29/06/2010 04:07:47 PM 44 Views
As the direct quote I provided proves, it was not only based on the 14th. *NM* Ghavrel - 30/06/2010 01:09:22 AM 42 Views
yes damookster - 29/06/2010 03:18:43 AM 145 Views
Yes. An armed polity is a defended polity. Tom - 29/06/2010 07:13:50 PM 123 Views
Yay for bare arms! (and other parts too ) Beqi - 28/06/2010 10:03:39 PM 147 Views
Good, but I am surprised at how many people I've heard today saying stupid things like... everynametaken - 29/06/2010 03:18:29 AM 160 Views
I really don't think you should be amazed. nossy - 29/06/2010 04:14:20 PM 131 Views
Interesting on many levels. Joel - 29/06/2010 10:27:30 AM 134 Views
Probably the right ruling. Dannymac - 29/06/2010 08:30:02 PM 140 Views
~sighs~ damookster - 30/06/2010 02:23:21 AM 128 Views
Let's be serious, plenty of supposed constitutional rights nowadays were not intended that way. Legolas - 30/06/2010 11:31:01 AM 134 Views
that is a separate discussion damookster - 01/07/2010 05:05:27 AM 127 Views
Re: that is a separate discussion Legolas - 01/07/2010 09:31:55 AM 122 Views
My first reading of the article indicated... Dannymac - 30/06/2010 02:50:33 PM 126 Views
yes, you were wrong damookster - 01/07/2010 04:48:17 AM 119 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes