How exactly did I justify anything? Perhaps you missed the subject of my post.
Sareitha Sedai Send a noteboard - 22/06/2010 02:28:21 PM
The man has a right to save his wife's life as long as he hurt no one else, which he didn't.
You believe the ends justify the means. I get that. I made no comment about what punishment the man should face, or whether he should face any. I pointed out that there were other (perfectly legal) ways of accomplishing the same ends that he could and should have chosen.
Saying something "is the law" doesn't justify it.
Nor does saying "nothing bad came of it".
Justice, whatever that may be, certainly takes into account circumstances. It simply isn't fair to do otherwise. The man has a right to save his wife's life as long as he hurt no one else, which he didn't. Giving him ANY punishment would be unjust. The purpose of having law enforcement that is human and not robotic/automated is that humans, well most of them, have an inherent sense of justice willing to allow exceptions in drastic situations, which this was. That and we don't have the technology to do that, but my point remains.
Yes, "justice" does take into account circumstances. But you'll note that my response did not address justice at all. I stated that it was a fact that the man broke the law, which is true. The law doesn't say that it's okay to treat stoplights as stop signs if you think you've made sure nobody's coming. The law also doesn't say that it's okay to evade the police if you have mitigating circumstances. There are allowances made for providing a defense to both of these charges, which again, come into play in deciding whether there will be consequences and to what extent. But that the law has been broken is indisputable.
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Police Officer stops man from entering ER while wife is having stroke
20/06/2010 10:08:49 PM
- 1337 Views
So?
20/06/2010 11:53:33 PM
- 690 Views
Carrying a woman into the ER doesn't really scream "made up excuse"
21/06/2010 12:24:30 AM
- 1165 Views
This story betrays a simple fact: police officers often abuse their "power".
21/06/2010 02:23:25 AM
- 726 Views
Re: This story betrays a simple fact: police officers often abuse their "power".
21/06/2010 04:22:31 AM
- 807 Views
unfortunately the law is on the officer's side, no matter whether he acted correctly
21/06/2010 07:09:13 AM
- 693 Views
well this is,really, a drastically different situation
21/06/2010 08:11:39 AM
- 754 Views
the point is, the officer is not required to show compassion, only enforce the law
21/06/2010 11:53:51 PM
- 609 Views
no. a officer is NOT only required to hold up the law.
22/06/2010 12:28:05 AM
- 619 Views
Re: unfortunately the law is on the officer's side, no matter whether he acted correctly
21/06/2010 02:27:59 PM
- 585 Views
I am sorryt but your brother-in-law didn't have the right to endanger others
21/06/2010 07:20:20 PM
- 651 Views
nobody has that right but there should be some leeway considering the circumstances *NM*
22/06/2010 01:31:00 AM
- 321 Views
At the very least the officer should have let medical personnel take the woman in for treatment
21/06/2010 02:56:30 PM
- 698 Views
"The fact is that the man broke the law" is nonsense. That's what judgment is for.
21/06/2010 05:30:26 PM
- 726 Views
But you can get pulled over for going 1 mile over.
21/06/2010 05:59:51 PM
- 761 Views
Yes, you CAN, but any cop who did is a pathetic waste, who doesn't deserve the badge *NM*
22/06/2010 07:06:19 AM
- 284 Views
But then he's have to use a cell phone while driving! Another crime! *NM*
22/06/2010 02:41:51 AM
- 344 Views
This is ridiculous
22/06/2010 03:18:03 AM
- 739 Views
How exactly did I justify anything? Perhaps you missed the subject of my post.
22/06/2010 02:28:21 PM
- 672 Views
I'm saying the fact that the law was broken is totally irrelevent,
23/06/2010 02:15:56 AM
- 775 Views
It is sad when idiocy and a lack of judgment becomes codified into law backed with enforcement power
21/06/2010 09:56:32 PM
- 1085 Views
The cop should be fired and fined
23/06/2010 03:40:32 PM
- 633 Views