Active Users:1183 Time:22/11/2024 10:31:47 PM
the point is, the officer is not required to show compassion, only enforce the law moondog Send a noteboard - 21/06/2010 11:53:51 PM
it's up to the discretion of the officer if he is willing to let them go, considering the circumstances. i highly doubt any court is going to reprimand the officer in the original article, he is pretty much acting in accordance with what the legal system requires of him.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
Police Officer stops man from entering ER while wife is having stroke - 20/06/2010 10:08:49 PM 1336 Views
So? - 20/06/2010 11:53:33 PM 690 Views
Seriously? - 21/06/2010 12:11:17 AM 756 Views
Carrying a woman into the ER doesn't really scream "made up excuse" - 21/06/2010 12:24:30 AM 1165 Views
Time and place. - 21/06/2010 02:25:27 AM 766 Views
Plus he was carrying a woman - 21/06/2010 11:40:18 AM 812 Views
Oh please. *NM* - 21/06/2010 03:34:16 AM 323 Views
i cant even take this seriously. - 21/06/2010 04:28:12 AM 861 Views
he clearly wasn't just "making up an excuse" though. - 21/06/2010 10:59:13 AM 900 Views
unfortunately the law is on the officer's side, no matter whether he acted correctly - 21/06/2010 07:09:13 AM 692 Views
well this is,really, a drastically different situation - 21/06/2010 08:11:39 AM 754 Views
the point is, the officer is not required to show compassion, only enforce the law - 21/06/2010 11:53:51 PM 609 Views
no. a officer is NOT only required to hold up the law. - 22/06/2010 12:28:05 AM 619 Views
i'm not disagreeing with you - 22/06/2010 01:25:43 AM 731 Views
except in this case (you seem to be ignoring this) - 22/06/2010 01:35:21 AM 674 Views
At the very least the officer should have let medical personnel take the woman in for treatment - 21/06/2010 02:56:30 PM 698 Views
But... - 21/06/2010 04:58:06 PM 764 Views
"The fact is that the man broke the law" is nonsense. That's what judgment is for. - 21/06/2010 05:30:26 PM 726 Views
But you can get pulled over for going 1 mile over. - 21/06/2010 05:59:51 PM 761 Views
the thing is... - 22/06/2010 12:29:43 AM 608 Views
But then he's have to use a cell phone while driving! Another crime! *NM* - 22/06/2010 02:41:51 AM 343 Views
Not in TN *NM* - 22/06/2010 02:02:32 PM 284 Views
This is ridiculous - 22/06/2010 03:18:03 AM 739 Views
How exactly did I justify anything? Perhaps you missed the subject of my post. - 22/06/2010 02:28:21 PM 671 Views
I'm saying the fact that the law was broken is totally irrelevent, - 23/06/2010 02:15:56 AM 774 Views
How can it be even slightly irrelevant, let alone "totally" so? - 25/06/2010 03:24:19 PM 643 Views
It is sad when idiocy and a lack of judgment becomes codified into law backed with enforcement power - 21/06/2010 09:56:32 PM 1085 Views
i don't even know if I'd be happy with a lawsuit - 22/06/2010 12:31:18 AM 656 Views
The cop should be fired and fined - 23/06/2010 03:40:32 PM 633 Views
You are such a bleeding heart liberal.. - 25/06/2010 03:22:42 AM 640 Views
LOL - - 25/06/2010 03:11:47 PM 638 Views

Reply to Message