I think they've been measured as louder than those air horns.
Liam Send a noteboard - 14/06/2010 02:30:58 PM
The lower pitch of a vuvuzela is much less intrusive when you're trying to listen to the commentary. And at least the loudness of a vuvuzela is limited by the strength of the blower's own lungs.
Or the combined sound of the vuvuzelas are anyway. And they don't stop. Players can't hear each other on the pitch.
Apparently they add to the atmosphere if you're actually there, so it's kind of understandable, but through the television it's just irritating.
---
Oh, how simply grand it is to be travelling by dirigible again. Direct us to the west good sir, tonight we will remember what it is to live.
Oh, how simply grand it is to be travelling by dirigible again. Direct us to the west good sir, tonight we will remember what it is to live.
I kinda want to get some of these for when I attend games
14/06/2010 01:48:21 PM
- 684 Views
~kills you with brain~
14/06/2010 02:09:02 PM
- 397 Views
They're a zillion times better than those high-pitched pressure canister horns.
14/06/2010 02:24:22 PM
- 389 Views
I think they've been measured as louder than those air horns.
14/06/2010 02:30:58 PM
- 406 Views
That word looks so dirty. *NM*
14/06/2010 05:57:01 PM
- 181 Views
I like them, it makes the South African World Cup a South African World Cup rather than generic
14/06/2010 02:14:13 PM
- 454 Views
My only problem with them is that the sound of the crowd never really changes.
14/06/2010 02:26:10 PM
- 391 Views