Active Users:1033 Time:13/11/2024 06:43:30 AM
British grammar Deadsy Send a noteboard - 14/06/2010 07:15:43 AM
the US and UK spell things differently and use some different words, obviously, but the main grammar difference I've noticed is this:


"That's how bad Australia were."

I'm quoting someone from this site, but I see this all the time from Brits.

Does that mean in the UK it's incorrect to write "That's how bad Australia was." ?

I'm just wondering because I think in America the first way is considered incorrect. Or is it just an accent thing and people are typing out the accent, but wouldn't actually write it that way if they were writing a paper? I've been wondering this for years.

But now that I think of it, it makes sense both ways. "Australia were great." "They were great." Or "the team was great." "Australia was great." I just never see Americans using "were" in that instance.
This message last edited by Deadsy on 14/06/2010 at 07:16:11 AM
Reply to message
British grammar - 14/06/2010 07:15:43 AM 562 Views
You can write it either way in Britain. - 14/06/2010 08:29:28 AM 370 Views
One thing I've been wondering ... for, oh, the last five or six hours... - 14/06/2010 08:32:56 AM 628 Views
Kind of but not really any more. But it's still different in continental Europe. - 14/06/2010 08:36:40 AM 483 Views
Hmm... Long scale seems confusing - 14/06/2010 08:49:06 AM 453 Views
It kind of depends on how you look at it. - 14/06/2010 11:09:00 AM 357 Views
It's the same with club teams as well - 14/06/2010 11:14:56 AM 375 Views
A few examples of collective nouns: - 14/06/2010 06:32:13 PM 355 Views
You can still follow the guidelines of British English... - 14/06/2010 06:35:48 PM 333 Views
The British usually pluralise groups. - 14/06/2010 06:55:44 PM 373 Views

Reply to Message