Ah, OK, I can see that; I was thinking in terms of shooting AT someone.
Joel Send a noteboard - 13/06/2010 03:02:06 PM
The policy is to say "Who's there? Stop, or I'll shoot!" and fire a round off into the air to get their attention before going on and actually defending oneself.
A "shoot to kill" policy takes away these requirements to warn.
A "shoot to kill" policy takes away these requirements to warn.
I'll certainly agree that warning shots into the air aren't going to do the job here. "Shoot to kill" has always carried the connotation to me, rightly or wrongly, of "don't wound, kill" rather than "don't shoot AT them, just fire into the air so they remember you COULD. " Although we shouldn't forget that what goes up must come down (unless it's from a railgun, maybe, but even that wouldn't escape solar gravity. ) Plenty of people have received injuries of varying severity in such a way.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Kyrgyzstan orders shoot-to-kill to quell clashes
13/06/2010 04:33:00 AM
- 638 Views
"Shoot to kill" seems a rather redundant phrase.
13/06/2010 02:27:26 PM
- 446 Views
No it isn't. Virtually all military guards have a policy to fire into the air first to scare people
13/06/2010 02:53:31 PM
- 453 Views
Ah, OK, I can see that; I was thinking in terms of shooting AT someone.
13/06/2010 03:02:06 PM
- 469 Views