Active Users:1099 Time:22/11/2024 07:54:44 AM
That's the problem with the speech - the large majority of what she had to say was worthwhile. Legolas Send a noteboard - 08/06/2010 01:15:39 PM
And had nothing to do with the US besides, the speech is about the Dreyfus affair and anti-semitism. As I already said in my initial reply, it's a shame that she throws in a few ignorant comments on American politics that put off American readers. There's another one later in the speech that would piss you off even more, I'm fairly sure, considering that it pissed me off and I'm not even American, much less a Republican.

Still, the speech as a whole is worth listening to or reading, particularly since you seem to be interested in matters of European anti-semitism. :P Just ignore every mention of the US.
Reply to message
Jacqueline Rose on the Dreyfus affair and related problems, in the LRB - 06/06/2010 11:28:14 AM 1069 Views
What she has to say about Dreyfus is very interesting. - 06/06/2010 04:48:16 PM 859 Views
Re: What she has to say about Dreyfus is very interesting. - 06/06/2010 04:56:32 PM 785 Views
*remains amused at the suggestion of the Dreyfus Affairs "pertinence" to "current" events* - 06/06/2010 05:14:23 PM 787 Views
I agree in part and (strongly) disagree in part. - 06/06/2010 05:40:26 PM 764 Views
"If it's an eternal struggle, how could there ever be a solution or a peace?" - 06/06/2010 06:20:39 PM 825 Views
Purim may or may not refer to a historic event. Even if it does, Haman was not likely an Arab. - 07/06/2010 12:00:05 AM 678 Views
I second your main point. - 07/06/2010 12:09:42 AM 686 Views
I don't discount that there is Arab blood in many or even most "Arabs". - 07/06/2010 12:18:32 AM 677 Views
Okay, fair enough then. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:45:19 AM 300 Views
The holiday is centuries old and real, regardless. - 07/06/2010 12:28:59 AM 765 Views
You're still missing the major point here. - 07/06/2010 12:44:08 AM 674 Views
That seems a rather limited view of history. - 07/06/2010 01:10:11 AM 777 Views
What the Hell are you going on about? - 07/06/2010 04:08:19 AM 730 Views
Oooh - 07/06/2010 11:07:43 AM 597 Views
Yeah, to whom was the claim on that land given? - 07/06/2010 10:35:42 PM 726 Views
jeez Joel... - 07/06/2010 04:24:47 AM 714 Views
No, the Persians are not Arabs. - 07/06/2010 10:09:47 PM 843 Views
I (coincidentally) stumbled across those infamous hadith passages about Jews the other day. - 07/06/2010 09:41:39 AM 759 Views
So? - 07/06/2010 10:50:49 PM 747 Views
So the relevance of apocalyptic passages is close to zero. - 07/06/2010 11:55:05 PM 707 Views
Not to mention - 08/06/2010 09:09:27 AM 644 Views
Then why are they canon? - 08/06/2010 06:25:09 PM 896 Views
are you claiming that people would pull some things out of holy text and ignore the rest? - 08/06/2010 12:16:41 PM 777 Views
*NM* - 08/06/2010 01:16:13 PM 294 Views
well, for me this just proves why we are not supposed to live among non-Jews - 06/06/2010 11:39:45 PM 858 Views
how so? - 06/06/2010 11:41:18 PM 636 Views
It reminds me of what I kept thinking as I read it. - 07/06/2010 12:51:36 AM 660 Views
couldn't get past the part where anyone who opposes Obama is a racist *NM* - 08/06/2010 01:40:07 AM 470 Views
You hallucinated? *NM* - 08/06/2010 08:39:37 AM 346 Views
No, that would've been one of the places where she should've shut up. *NM* - 08/06/2010 08:58:11 AM 283 Views
No - 08/06/2010 09:08:04 AM 641 Views
I think he's not talking about that bit, but about the very first paragraph. - 08/06/2010 09:30:21 AM 767 Views
If there was more I didn't get far enough to hear it - 08/06/2010 12:09:47 PM 627 Views
That's the problem with the speech - the large majority of what she had to say was worthwhile. - 08/06/2010 01:15:39 PM 692 Views
The problem is blatant bias - 08/06/2010 02:24:57 PM 670 Views

Reply to Message