Active Users:456 Time:04/04/2025 10:15:36 PM
Re: What she has to say about Dreyfus is very interesting. Camilla Send a noteboard - 06/06/2010 04:56:32 PM
I must admit, though I'm relatively familiar with the Dreyfus Affair, I didn't realize it had led to real violence and pogroms - she doesn't mention any casualties, which I hope means there weren't any, but even so. And I like her take on it, and the way she explains the various ways of looking at it, and the difficult position of the French Jews on the affair.

Unfortunately, she felt the need to throw in some comments on contemporary politics inbetween, and several of those I found cringeworthy, or at the very least simplistic and not worthy of the generally high-quality lecture. She would've done better to shut up about the US - the remark about the UK and how dangerous the "we can't reveal this evidence because of national security" thing is, that was good, but pretty much whenever she mentioned the US, it was silly. In the case of the Scott Brown comparison, I'd even say outrageous. I'm curious if somebody will comment on that in the Q&A (I read the written version of her speech rather than watching it, goes a lot faster that way).


Yes, the Scott Brown bit was a bit of a stretch as far as analogies go, but I can see her point (that justice should not be different depending on whether you are part of one group or another).

The Q&A was less interesting than I had hoped for, unfortunately, and I could only get it to play 20 minutes, but it is worth seeing.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
Jacqueline Rose on the Dreyfus affair and related problems, in the LRB - 06/06/2010 11:28:14 AM 1138 Views
What she has to say about Dreyfus is very interesting. - 06/06/2010 04:48:16 PM 926 Views
Re: What she has to say about Dreyfus is very interesting. - 06/06/2010 04:56:32 PM 851 Views
*remains amused at the suggestion of the Dreyfus Affairs "pertinence" to "current" events* - 06/06/2010 05:14:23 PM 865 Views
I agree in part and (strongly) disagree in part. - 06/06/2010 05:40:26 PM 832 Views
"If it's an eternal struggle, how could there ever be a solution or a peace?" - 06/06/2010 06:20:39 PM 895 Views
Purim may or may not refer to a historic event. Even if it does, Haman was not likely an Arab. - 07/06/2010 12:00:05 AM 747 Views
I second your main point. - 07/06/2010 12:09:42 AM 762 Views
I don't discount that there is Arab blood in many or even most "Arabs". - 07/06/2010 12:18:32 AM 747 Views
Okay, fair enough then. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:45:19 AM 330 Views
The holiday is centuries old and real, regardless. - 07/06/2010 12:28:59 AM 836 Views
You're still missing the major point here. - 07/06/2010 12:44:08 AM 751 Views
That seems a rather limited view of history. - 07/06/2010 01:10:11 AM 849 Views
What the Hell are you going on about? - 07/06/2010 04:08:19 AM 813 Views
Oooh - 07/06/2010 11:07:43 AM 652 Views
Yeah, to whom was the claim on that land given? - 07/06/2010 10:35:42 PM 773 Views
jeez Joel... - 07/06/2010 04:24:47 AM 789 Views
No, the Persians are not Arabs. - 07/06/2010 10:09:47 PM 924 Views
I (coincidentally) stumbled across those infamous hadith passages about Jews the other day. - 07/06/2010 09:41:39 AM 837 Views
So? - 07/06/2010 10:50:49 PM 815 Views
So the relevance of apocalyptic passages is close to zero. - 07/06/2010 11:55:05 PM 777 Views
Not to mention - 08/06/2010 09:09:27 AM 682 Views
Then why are they canon? - 08/06/2010 06:25:09 PM 980 Views
are you claiming that people would pull some things out of holy text and ignore the rest? - 08/06/2010 12:16:41 PM 835 Views
*NM* - 08/06/2010 01:16:13 PM 323 Views
well, for me this just proves why we are not supposed to live among non-Jews - 06/06/2010 11:39:45 PM 932 Views
how so? - 06/06/2010 11:41:18 PM 699 Views
It reminds me of what I kept thinking as I read it. - 07/06/2010 12:51:36 AM 728 Views
couldn't get past the part where anyone who opposes Obama is a racist *NM* - 08/06/2010 01:40:07 AM 501 Views
You hallucinated? *NM* - 08/06/2010 08:39:37 AM 374 Views
No, that would've been one of the places where she should've shut up. *NM* - 08/06/2010 08:58:11 AM 310 Views
No - 08/06/2010 09:08:04 AM 713 Views
I think he's not talking about that bit, but about the very first paragraph. - 08/06/2010 09:30:21 AM 848 Views
If there was more I didn't get far enough to hear it - 08/06/2010 12:09:47 PM 700 Views
That's the problem with the speech - the large majority of what she had to say was worthwhile. - 08/06/2010 01:15:39 PM 754 Views
The problem is blatant bias - 08/06/2010 02:24:57 PM 740 Views

Reply to Message