Kerry got crap for saying he voted for the bill before he voted against it and for saying if you wanted to know what kind of leader he would be ask the people he served with knowing that many of them opposed him.
I hate to speak out against your faith but it was Fox was hardly alone in not being critical of the war before it began. They did have a number of anchors who supported finishing and who supported the surge when those on the left were saying we should cut and run and screaming that the surge was never work. Funny how much criticism Fox gets for right about and how much chest thumping the left continues to do about being wrong.
I hate to speak out against your faith but it was Fox was hardly alone in not being critical of the war before it began. They did have a number of anchors who supported finishing and who supported the surge when those on the left were saying we should cut and run and screaming that the surge was never work. Funny how much criticism Fox gets for right about and how much chest thumping the left continues to do about being wrong.
Indeed, as I noted above, Kerry got crap for saying he voted for the bill before he voted against it, because he only changed his vote when Republicans started tacking on a whole bunch of pork that didn't help the troops at all. No one wanted to hear it in '04, least of all Faux, so I don't know why they suddenly care now. Apart from partisan bias, of course.
I covered Kerrys nuanced (and therefore disastrous) quote as well as Foxs consistent support for the war both when it was very popular AND when it was very unpopular (by which point the rest of the media had largely abandoned it, which might makes sense in terms of liberal media bias, yet that doesn't explain why they supported it initially. ) But I seriously couldn't follow that second paragraph, man. You may not have noticed, but what I USUALLY do is ignore the typos themselves and respond to the content (mainly because I once got yelled at for "revising" a block quote so I wouldn't feel guilty spotlighting so many rampant grammatical errors, and just so you understand it's not a partisan thing, that guy makes me look like Reagan.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87c35/87c35ab98ae7fb5951a48907ad70867983869bca" alt=":P"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cbeb/9cbeba01a61dbb627184fa7cce96ae93f889897d" alt="<img class="
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60e57/60e578d2f8d89cc754e55bd267d3167921721445" alt=""
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60e57/60e578d2f8d89cc754e55bd267d3167921721445" alt=""
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
US Debt Hits $13T - But Spending Spree in DC Continues.....
26/05/2010 05:09:48 PM
- 973 Views
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0af6/b0af67ac42029e98aea3ea1595f7e0df6090476d" alt=""
Look who finally remembered they oppose federal deficits.
26/05/2010 05:26:30 PM
- 593 Views
Silly Joel.....please find the posts where I supported GWB's deficit spending.
26/05/2010 05:35:13 PM
- 647 Views
hmmm
26/05/2010 05:40:49 PM
- 592 Views
That's different; spending trillions on the Iraq war is necessary national defense, just ask Fox.
26/05/2010 05:46:49 PM
- 796 Views
0.7 Trillion doesn't usually qualify as 'Trillions'
26/05/2010 06:16:15 PM
- 734 Views
I'm not willing to try parsing how much DoD spending was and wasn't Iraq just now.
26/05/2010 06:27:50 PM
- 708 Views
You can knock off the "Faux News" stuff, makes you sound like you've been hanging at Daily Kos
26/05/2010 07:06:16 PM
- 767 Views
A Fox News person was involved in writing the article so it sent him into a tissy fit
26/05/2010 10:56:35 PM
- 570 Views
Well, they annoyed the hell out of me by "accusing" Dems of something they supported for 5 years.
27/05/2010 03:30:08 PM
- 792 Views
This would sound better if you didn't say yourself the support was mostly fake
28/05/2010 01:05:44 PM
- 767 Views
I thought overthrowing Saddam was fine.....and it worked out very well.
26/05/2010 06:37:31 PM
- 563 Views
"They" plural.
26/05/2010 05:45:48 PM
- 816 Views
you are so full of crap
26/05/2010 05:59:47 PM
- 614 Views
Oh, they weren't silent; they were quite vocal in their endorsement of the Iraq war.
26/05/2010 06:03:51 PM
- 857 Views
more ranting doesn't support your argument
26/05/2010 06:17:22 PM
- 773 Views
I'll respond to the coherent part of that.
26/05/2010 06:30:07 PM
- 788 Views
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a544e/a544e9ee1bb31c638f049056f03f2cd0edd259f7" alt=""
I wish ...
26/05/2010 06:57:30 PM
- 767 Views
Is the NYT any better pieces slandering McCain and his wife before an election?
26/05/2010 07:16:58 PM
- 632 Views
I don't know those articles specifically.
26/05/2010 08:27:44 PM
- 690 Views
So my repeated use of "M$" in moondogs thread only makes things worse?
27/05/2010 03:35:06 PM
- 689 Views
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/680f3/680f390e2af88276f45b21b3d3670609ecb1e2b1" alt=""
You mean you will repsond to part that you like and ignore the part you don't because of a typo
26/05/2010 07:18:03 PM
- 709 Views
Actually, I think it was a pretty thorough response.
27/05/2010 03:57:55 PM
- 789 Views
I'll give Joel a little hand here...
26/05/2010 09:14:27 PM
- 802 Views
The second paragraph is very hard to follow unless you already have an idea what he's going to say.
27/05/2010 03:43:09 PM
- 709 Views
yes the good republicans spent a lot of money so democrats should spend even more argument
26/05/2010 05:52:57 PM
- 553 Views
Well, I'll certainly agree that if it's bad, it's bad whoever's doing it.
26/05/2010 06:00:20 PM
- 761 Views
you are attacking Fox News becuase you object to opposing views being expressed
26/05/2010 06:27:29 PM
- 763 Views
Not at all; I just expect a little consistency.
26/05/2010 06:40:07 PM
- 785 Views
then why not show some and admit that all the news agency were backing the war
26/05/2010 07:10:57 PM
- 762 Views
Yes, they were; most of them stopped: One of them didn't.
27/05/2010 03:08:34 PM
- 735 Views
so the other media outlets get a pass because the supported losing a war they supported starting?
27/05/2010 06:39:21 PM
- 607 Views
We were heading in the wrong direction already, but Obama/Dems put the pedal to the floor...
26/05/2010 06:41:48 PM
- 551 Views
I don't mean to defend all of the spending that Obama and Congress have done since he's in power...
26/05/2010 09:29:38 PM
- 740 Views
They did push the pedal further down even if they didn't start it
26/05/2010 10:46:38 PM
- 772 Views
Here is the problem with this kind of reporting...
27/05/2010 07:12:34 AM
- 698 Views
The problem with that kind of logic is it is wrong
27/05/2010 02:19:37 PM
- 590 Views
Yes, that would be wrong.
27/05/2010 03:35:30 PM
- 602 Views
Based on Obama's budget, he will add more to the debt over the next 10 years.....
27/05/2010 04:10:45 PM
- 525 Views
At least we agree that you are wrong because that is what you said
27/05/2010 06:50:43 PM
- 549 Views
And where does the rest of the money come from?
27/05/2010 08:12:31 PM
- 691 Views
No, that's for the entire Department of Defense.
27/05/2010 08:25:28 PM
- 589 Views
using those numbers the war appears to be about half a drop in the bucket *NM*
27/05/2010 08:37:31 PM
- 311 Views