The second paragraph is very hard to follow unless you already have an idea what he's going to say.
Joel Send a noteboard - 27/05/2010 03:43:09 PM
Kerry got crap for saying he voted for the bill before he voted against it and for saying if you wanted to know what kind of leader he would be ask the people he served with knowing that many of them opposed him.
I hate to speak out against your faith but it was Fox was hardly alone in not being critical of the war before it began. They did have a number of anchors who supported finishing and who supported the surge when those on the left were saying we should cut and run and screaming that the surge was never work. Funny how much criticism Fox gets for right about and how much chest thumping the left continues to do about being wrong.
I hate to speak out against your faith but it was Fox was hardly alone in not being critical of the war before it began. They did have a number of anchors who supported finishing and who supported the surge when those on the left were saying we should cut and run and screaming that the surge was never work. Funny how much criticism Fox gets for right about and how much chest thumping the left continues to do about being wrong.
The first paragraph makes perfect sense except for lacking commas, it's slightly easier to read as "and for saying, if you wanted to know what kind of leader he would be, ask the people he served with, knowing that many of them opposed him".
And then the end of the next paragraph:
"... and screaming that the surge was never gonna work. Funny how much criticism Fox gets for being right about that, and how much chest thumping the left continues to do about being wrong."
There are extra words where the way a statement was worded changed in mid-sentence, and missing words where the brain got ahead of the keys. I'm not perfect there either, but I do try to edit for it because I know it's confusing as hell. Figuring out "I hate to speak out against your faith but it was Fox was hardly alone in not being critical of the war before it began" and "Funny how much criticism Fox gets for right about and how much chest thumping the left continues to do about being wrong" on my way to bed was simply beyond me at the time. I was never going to get "funny how much criticism Fox gets for being right about [the surge working]... " because I'm not convinced it did or has long term. The very word "surge" demonstrates what was strategically wrong with that; we couldn't expect to simply inject 20,000 or however many soldiers for a brief temporary period and then withdraw with the expectation all hell wouldn't break loose once they left, and by calling it a "surge" they made clear all the insurgency had to do was "weather the storm. " I mean, if it's worked so well, why can't we leave...?
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
US Debt Hits $13T - But Spending Spree in DC Continues.....
- 26/05/2010 05:09:48 PM
917 Views
- 26/05/2010 05:09:48 PM
917 Views
Look who finally remembered they oppose federal deficits.
- 26/05/2010 05:26:30 PM
540 Views
Silly Joel.....please find the posts where I supported GWB's deficit spending.
- 26/05/2010 05:35:13 PM
597 Views
hmmm
- 26/05/2010 05:40:49 PM
536 Views
That's different; spending trillions on the Iraq war is necessary national defense, just ask Fox.
- 26/05/2010 05:46:49 PM
738 Views
0.7 Trillion doesn't usually qualify as 'Trillions'
- 26/05/2010 06:16:15 PM
683 Views
I'm not willing to try parsing how much DoD spending was and wasn't Iraq just now.
- 26/05/2010 06:27:50 PM
647 Views
You can knock off the "Faux News" stuff, makes you sound like you've been hanging at Daily Kos
- 26/05/2010 07:06:16 PM
702 Views
A Fox News person was involved in writing the article so it sent him into a tissy fit
- 26/05/2010 10:56:35 PM
507 Views
Well, they annoyed the hell out of me by "accusing" Dems of something they supported for 5 years.
- 27/05/2010 03:30:08 PM
724 Views
This would sound better if you didn't say yourself the support was mostly fake
- 28/05/2010 01:05:44 PM
709 Views
I thought overthrowing Saddam was fine.....and it worked out very well.
- 26/05/2010 06:37:31 PM
506 Views
"They" plural.
- 26/05/2010 05:45:48 PM
761 Views
you are so full of crap
- 26/05/2010 05:59:47 PM
559 Views
Oh, they weren't silent; they were quite vocal in their endorsement of the Iraq war.
- 26/05/2010 06:03:51 PM
804 Views
more ranting doesn't support your argument
- 26/05/2010 06:17:22 PM
719 Views
I'll respond to the coherent part of that.
- 26/05/2010 06:30:07 PM
733 Views
- 26/05/2010 06:30:07 PM
733 Views
I wish ...
- 26/05/2010 06:57:30 PM
707 Views
Is the NYT any better pieces slandering McCain and his wife before an election?
- 26/05/2010 07:16:58 PM
571 Views
I don't know those articles specifically.
- 26/05/2010 08:27:44 PM
641 Views
So my repeated use of "M$" in moondogs thread only makes things worse? 
- 27/05/2010 03:35:06 PM
637 Views
- 27/05/2010 03:35:06 PM
637 Views
You mean you will repsond to part that you like and ignore the part you don't because of a typo
- 26/05/2010 07:18:03 PM
677 Views
I'll give Joel a little hand here...
- 26/05/2010 09:14:27 PM
744 Views
The second paragraph is very hard to follow unless you already have an idea what he's going to say.
- 27/05/2010 03:43:09 PM
650 Views
yes the good republicans spent a lot of money so democrats should spend even more argument
- 26/05/2010 05:52:57 PM
499 Views
Well, I'll certainly agree that if it's bad, it's bad whoever's doing it.
- 26/05/2010 06:00:20 PM
707 Views
you are attacking Fox News becuase you object to opposing views being expressed
- 26/05/2010 06:27:29 PM
708 Views
Not at all; I just expect a little consistency.
- 26/05/2010 06:40:07 PM
730 Views
then why not show some and admit that all the news agency were backing the war
- 26/05/2010 07:10:57 PM
708 Views
Yes, they were; most of them stopped: One of them didn't.
- 27/05/2010 03:08:34 PM
679 Views
so the other media outlets get a pass because the supported losing a war they supported starting?
- 27/05/2010 06:39:21 PM
554 Views
We were heading in the wrong direction already, but Obama/Dems put the pedal to the floor...
- 26/05/2010 06:41:48 PM
494 Views
I don't mean to defend all of the spending that Obama and Congress have done since he's in power...
- 26/05/2010 09:29:38 PM
682 Views
They did push the pedal further down even if they didn't start it
- 26/05/2010 10:46:38 PM
717 Views
Here is the problem with this kind of reporting...
- 27/05/2010 07:12:34 AM
643 Views
The problem with that kind of logic is it is wrong
- 27/05/2010 02:19:37 PM
529 Views
Yes, that would be wrong.
- 27/05/2010 03:35:30 PM
547 Views
Based on Obama's budget, he will add more to the debt over the next 10 years.....
- 27/05/2010 04:10:45 PM
465 Views
At least we agree that you are wrong because that is what you said
- 27/05/2010 06:50:43 PM
496 Views
And where does the rest of the money come from?
- 27/05/2010 08:12:31 PM
636 Views
No, that's for the entire Department of Defense.
- 27/05/2010 08:25:28 PM
538 Views
using those numbers the war appears to be about half a drop in the bucket *NM*
- 27/05/2010 08:37:31 PM
289 Views
