It doesn't bother me that people call Fox News biased because they are it is their stubborn refusal to see the bias in other news sources that I find lacking. Take Joel here for instance, he insist on blaming Fox for the war even though he is more then old enough to remember the run up to the war and he shouldn't need anyone to tell him that support for the war was widespread in the media. Of course that doesn’t fit his world view so he just practices creative remembering in order to make the facts fit what he believes.
But I'm sure it happens on all ends of the political spectrum.
Are there left-leaning news sources that criticized Bush for overspending and are now supporting Obama's spending? If so, that's just as hypocritical as Fox News. And yes, I do believe Fox News is hypocrticial, and it bothers me that there are a lot of people (not necessarily here, but in general) who don't see that, and simply swallow opinions whole. The same sort of thing on the left would also bother me.
But really, the only thing I wanted to get after was the whole mock-names phenomenon. I see it everywhere. Faux News, M$, Nobama, etc. etc. It's lazy, labelling, smacks of bias like nothing else, and I always find it hard to take people seriously when they do it.
Warder to starry_nite
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
US Debt Hits $13T - But Spending Spree in DC Continues.....
- 26/05/2010 05:09:48 PM
1071 Views
- 26/05/2010 05:09:48 PM
1071 Views
Look who finally remembered they oppose federal deficits.
- 26/05/2010 05:26:30 PM
672 Views
Silly Joel.....please find the posts where I supported GWB's deficit spending.
- 26/05/2010 05:35:13 PM
729 Views
hmmm
- 26/05/2010 05:40:49 PM
665 Views
That's different; spending trillions on the Iraq war is necessary national defense, just ask Fox.
- 26/05/2010 05:46:49 PM
875 Views
0.7 Trillion doesn't usually qualify as 'Trillions'
- 26/05/2010 06:16:15 PM
822 Views
I'm not willing to try parsing how much DoD spending was and wasn't Iraq just now.
- 26/05/2010 06:27:50 PM
788 Views
You can knock off the "Faux News" stuff, makes you sound like you've been hanging at Daily Kos
- 26/05/2010 07:06:16 PM
849 Views
A Fox News person was involved in writing the article so it sent him into a tissy fit
- 26/05/2010 10:56:35 PM
643 Views
Well, they annoyed the hell out of me by "accusing" Dems of something they supported for 5 years.
- 27/05/2010 03:30:08 PM
871 Views
This would sound better if you didn't say yourself the support was mostly fake
- 28/05/2010 01:05:44 PM
866 Views
I thought overthrowing Saddam was fine.....and it worked out very well.
- 26/05/2010 06:37:31 PM
651 Views
"They" plural.
- 26/05/2010 05:45:48 PM
895 Views
you are so full of crap
- 26/05/2010 05:59:47 PM
701 Views
Oh, they weren't silent; they were quite vocal in their endorsement of the Iraq war.
- 26/05/2010 06:03:51 PM
940 Views
more ranting doesn't support your argument
- 26/05/2010 06:17:22 PM
858 Views
I'll respond to the coherent part of that. 
- 26/05/2010 06:30:07 PM
871 Views
- 26/05/2010 06:30:07 PM
871 Views
I wish ...
- 26/05/2010 06:57:30 PM
878 Views
Is the NYT any better pieces slandering McCain and his wife before an election?
- 26/05/2010 07:16:58 PM
715 Views
I don't know those articles specifically.
- 26/05/2010 08:27:44 PM
784 Views
So my repeated use of "M$" in moondogs thread only makes things worse? 
- 27/05/2010 03:35:06 PM
767 Views
- 27/05/2010 03:35:06 PM
767 Views
You mean you will repsond to part that you like and ignore the part you don't because of a typo
- 26/05/2010 07:18:03 PM
788 Views
I'll give Joel a little hand here...
- 26/05/2010 09:14:27 PM
881 Views
The second paragraph is very hard to follow unless you already have an idea what he's going to say.
- 27/05/2010 03:43:09 PM
805 Views
yes the good republicans spent a lot of money so democrats should spend even more argument
- 26/05/2010 05:52:57 PM
637 Views
Well, I'll certainly agree that if it's bad, it's bad whoever's doing it.
- 26/05/2010 06:00:20 PM
840 Views
you are attacking Fox News becuase you object to opposing views being expressed
- 26/05/2010 06:27:29 PM
842 Views
Not at all; I just expect a little consistency.
- 26/05/2010 06:40:07 PM
873 Views
then why not show some and admit that all the news agency were backing the war
- 26/05/2010 07:10:57 PM
852 Views
Yes, they were; most of them stopped: One of them didn't.
- 27/05/2010 03:08:34 PM
823 Views
so the other media outlets get a pass because the supported losing a war they supported starting?
- 27/05/2010 06:39:21 PM
686 Views
We were heading in the wrong direction already, but Obama/Dems put the pedal to the floor...
- 26/05/2010 06:41:48 PM
640 Views
I don't mean to defend all of the spending that Obama and Congress have done since he's in power...
- 26/05/2010 09:29:38 PM
823 Views
They did push the pedal further down even if they didn't start it
- 26/05/2010 10:46:38 PM
872 Views
Here is the problem with this kind of reporting...
- 27/05/2010 07:12:34 AM
778 Views
The problem with that kind of logic is it is wrong
- 27/05/2010 02:19:37 PM
674 Views
Yes, that would be wrong.
- 27/05/2010 03:35:30 PM
692 Views
Based on Obama's budget, he will add more to the debt over the next 10 years.....
- 27/05/2010 04:10:45 PM
612 Views
At least we agree that you are wrong because that is what you said
- 27/05/2010 06:50:43 PM
629 Views
And where does the rest of the money come from?
- 27/05/2010 08:12:31 PM
777 Views
No, that's for the entire Department of Defense.
- 27/05/2010 08:25:28 PM
672 Views
using those numbers the war appears to be about half a drop in the bucket *NM*
- 27/05/2010 08:37:31 PM
349 Views
