Active Users:1060 Time:13/11/2024 06:08:03 AM
It's a tad immoral but it is your money, bad strategy though Isaac Send a noteboard - 26/05/2010 08:40:10 AM
Because of the media hype people on the left tend to think of the tea party as a separate wing, full of nutters, when it's just a strong conservative movement with populist tendencies that lacking any solid structure and hierarchy tends to bring in the whack-jobs who also tend to appear on the news because they make good news, most tea partiers I know are middle class and middle aged regular voters. They've little core universal tenets beyond 'big government bad' and most of their members vote republican, just prefer Inhofe's over Snowe's. So really sending a tea-party affiliate money for their campaign is just strengthening their primary bid and if they win their general election fund. You might derail a right-wing victory, but not by vote-siphoning, rather by making moderates nervous to vote for them in the General Election. But I'd bet that a campaign ad by a tea-party person funded by leftists would lose far fewer voted for them (it would probably gain them votes) than giving that money to a leftist who will run an ad with it gaining them votes. I would say you'd be better off voting for the same person with pocketbook and ballot.

Morality wise, you should really affiliate to the party you want to win, or the party you most sympathize with who you think can win, and vote for them in the general and in the primaries. It's dishonest to vote for a different party in the primary, and would if done in large numbers only result in parties going out of their way to only offer one viable candidate so their voters could cross and vote for the other party to tamper with them and make themselves hardened against rival party primary tampering. Just keep to the spirit of the thing, vote for who you want to win the general election, donate to people you want to win the general election. Democracy is already rough enough in translating the will of the people into action without adding any more road bumps from people trying to game the system.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
So here is my question RE: The Party System - 25/05/2010 08:29:52 PM 658 Views
They do ballet as well? *NM* - 25/05/2010 09:16:21 PM 218 Views
I would watch that. - 25/05/2010 10:29:46 PM 502 Views
They all do *NM* - 25/05/2010 10:49:34 PM 183 Views
You do realize Obama's not running this year... - 25/05/2010 10:44:22 PM 484 Views
I don't believe any of them have won on the Tea Party ballet - 25/05/2010 11:09:26 PM 475 Views
Kind of off topic, but still related. - 26/05/2010 06:34:28 AM 471 Views
It's a method of showing dissatisfaction. - 26/05/2010 06:44:39 AM 431 Views
Re: It's a method of showing dissatisfaction. - 26/05/2010 07:01:03 AM 505 Views
it's more than just showing dissatisfaction - 26/05/2010 07:43:31 AM 473 Views
That would be stupid - 26/05/2010 07:52:41 AM 478 Views
Re: It's a method of showing dissatisfaction. - 27/05/2010 05:39:53 PM 442 Views
Re: It's a method of showing dissatisfaction. - 27/05/2010 07:47:11 PM 477 Views
Re: It's a method of showing dissatisfaction. - 27/05/2010 07:49:35 PM 433 Views
Re: Kind of off topic, but still related. - 26/05/2010 07:41:57 AM 478 Views
All you need to know about the Two Party System - 26/05/2010 07:51:30 AM 614 Views
According to the left, the Tea Party movement is funded by corporations & the wealthy. - 26/05/2010 08:21:46 AM 483 Views
the word party has caused a lot of confusion - 26/05/2010 02:29:07 PM 473 Views
It's a tad immoral but it is your money, bad strategy though - 26/05/2010 08:40:10 AM 416 Views
Seems pretty unethical to me. *NM* - 26/05/2010 11:36:45 AM 185 Views
A move worthy of the people you usually denounce. *NM* - 26/05/2010 10:39:05 PM 204 Views
The Tea Party just ain't you, Danny - 27/05/2010 05:10:45 AM 407 Views

Reply to Message