Active Users:1642 Time:19/10/2025 05:53:46 AM
Indeed Danu Send a noteboard - 23/05/2010 07:11:27 PM
Women's and men's.
Why does spell check show it to be wrong?

I've almost exclusively dated guys who absolutely love going down on women, without trying to select for that trait. Apparently you're attracted to men who don't have that particular trait. So it's far more interesting to find out if there's a correlation between particular traits, and why you don't find them attractive.

Not all the men I've dated dislike going down but the majority has.
Hmmm...I was married to a gay man for 13 years...maybe I'm attracted to men who have a latent gay gene? Even that big strong, seemingly, manly man?
CrazedWeasel
OCWIATJ Forever!
Reply to message
/Surveyish? Sex question for heterosexual men, so beware. - 23/05/2010 05:22:43 AM 942 Views
Replyish, beware. - 23/05/2010 06:15:17 AM 793 Views
Don't be shy D. - 23/05/2010 06:49:23 AM 695 Views
You're obviously dating the wrong men - 23/05/2010 06:56:24 AM 765 Views
Indeed - 23/05/2010 07:11:27 PM 709 Views
Why the hell not - 23/05/2010 07:55:39 AM 741 Views
*wonders how long it will take a guy to post a survey asking girls about blow jobs* *NM* - 23/05/2010 08:15:09 AM 301 Views
Approximately eight hours. - 23/05/2010 01:36:17 PM 869 Views
*shudders* *NM* - 23/05/2010 01:19:52 PM 276 Views
You don't enjoy getting head? *NM* - 23/05/2010 06:22:45 PM 272 Views
NB sent. *NM* - 23/05/2010 02:40:31 PM 305 Views
Re: /Surveyish? Sex question for heterosexual men, so beware. - 23/05/2010 04:44:09 PM 679 Views
Re: /Surveyish? Sex question for heterosexual men, so beware. - 23/05/2010 07:04:41 PM 615 Views
Re: Sex for heterosexual men - 23/05/2010 05:31:29 PM 750 Views
Re: Sex for heterosexual men - 23/05/2010 07:12:44 PM 636 Views
Well, you know my unfortunate deal, but I'll answer anyway - 24/05/2010 05:54:48 AM 664 Views
Nothing to beware of here - just answers - 24/05/2010 09:55:32 AM 665 Views
Re: /Surveyish? Sex question for heterosexual men, so beware. - 24/05/2010 05:05:39 PM 617 Views

Reply to Message