Active Users:474 Time:27/12/2024 05:22:30 PM
Indeed Danu Send a noteboard - 23/05/2010 07:11:27 PM
Women's and men's.
Why does spell check show it to be wrong?

I've almost exclusively dated guys who absolutely love going down on women, without trying to select for that trait. Apparently you're attracted to men who don't have that particular trait. So it's far more interesting to find out if there's a correlation between particular traits, and why you don't find them attractive.

Not all the men I've dated dislike going down but the majority has.
Hmmm...I was married to a gay man for 13 years...maybe I'm attracted to men who have a latent gay gene? Even that big strong, seemingly, manly man?
CrazedWeasel
OCWIATJ Forever!
Reply to message
/Surveyish? Sex question for heterosexual men, so beware. - 23/05/2010 05:22:43 AM 824 Views
Replyish, beware. - 23/05/2010 06:15:17 AM 670 Views
Don't be shy D. - 23/05/2010 06:49:23 AM 586 Views
You're obviously dating the wrong men - 23/05/2010 06:56:24 AM 636 Views
Indeed - 23/05/2010 07:11:27 PM 579 Views
Why the hell not - 23/05/2010 07:55:39 AM 614 Views
*wonders how long it will take a guy to post a survey asking girls about blow jobs* *NM* - 23/05/2010 08:15:09 AM 240 Views
Approximately eight hours. - 23/05/2010 01:36:17 PM 705 Views
*shudders* *NM* - 23/05/2010 01:19:52 PM 224 Views
You don't enjoy getting head? *NM* - 23/05/2010 06:22:45 PM 223 Views
NB sent. *NM* - 23/05/2010 02:40:31 PM 255 Views
Re: /Surveyish? Sex question for heterosexual men, so beware. - 23/05/2010 04:44:09 PM 557 Views
Re: /Surveyish? Sex question for heterosexual men, so beware. - 23/05/2010 07:04:41 PM 487 Views
Re: Sex for heterosexual men - 23/05/2010 05:31:29 PM 621 Views
Re: Sex for heterosexual men - 23/05/2010 07:12:44 PM 510 Views
Well, you know my unfortunate deal, but I'll answer anyway - 24/05/2010 05:54:48 AM 541 Views
Nothing to beware of here - just answers - 24/05/2010 09:55:32 AM 536 Views
Re: /Surveyish? Sex question for heterosexual men, so beware. - 24/05/2010 05:05:39 PM 496 Views

Reply to Message