Active Users:1109 Time:23/11/2024 12:07:36 AM
It's correct, but not by itself. The "which" introduces a subordinate clause relative to the "that." Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 15/05/2010 09:18:07 PM
It's a little archaic, maybe, but it's not incorrect.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Grammar question - 15/05/2010 07:57:21 PM 486 Views
It's correct, but not by itself. The "which" introduces a subordinate clause relative to the "that." - 15/05/2010 09:18:07 PM 398 Views
mk, i thought it might be something like that (and what beckstcw said) - 15/05/2010 09:37:38 PM 380 Views
Learning Farsi helped me understand this, they use this structure all the time. - 15/05/2010 09:28:03 PM 487 Views
Spanish has the same. - 15/05/2010 10:34:30 PM 401 Views
I think it's "ce que." *NM* - 15/05/2010 10:55:06 PM 148 Views
yes *NM* - 15/05/2010 10:58:27 PM 152 Views
It's entirely grammatical but somewhat formal/old-fashioned. - 15/05/2010 11:43:59 PM 489 Views

Reply to Message