Re: If not a fan of Labour and not a fan of Tory, then
Camilla Send a noteboard - 14/05/2010 12:06:56 AM
they might not, tempered by Lib-Dems, but Tories have no clean reputation when it comes to abuse of state power.
let's give a chance to those who haven't for the past decade. Seriously, you don't know how upsetting it is to see what Labour has been doing in the UK in regards to curtailing civil rights in the name of safety. Not to mention blindly following into Iraq without question. That was a horrid moment and not one that should ever have happened under Labour. I can understand under John Howard(Aus), but not Blair.
Why do you think I do not know how upsetting it is to see what Labour has been doing? I am no fan of Labour. Anything but. You should know this. Really.
whatever form of new Tory the Lib Dems cause them to become should be an interesting political experiment.
Hey, I prefer combination of Green and Liberal Democract as the poll said.
The Tories, in all probability, will not stand by whatever they have promised the LibDems. They have bought their soul (PR) with trinkets that they will not have to fulfil. If I am wrong, that will make me happy. But I do not think I am.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
How to live with the Tories
13/05/2010 12:33:49 PM
- 959 Views
Her 101 reasons to love our Tory government was even better.
13/05/2010 12:42:39 PM
- 622 Views
What an even-handed, stereotype-free, and balanced piece of journalism. *NM*
13/05/2010 02:07:35 PM
- 293 Views
Your partisanship is getting annoying, actually.
13/05/2010 06:55:28 PM
- 694 Views
I'm sorry I care about politics.
13/05/2010 08:45:26 PM
- 634 Views
It's easy to complain. Actually doing something is rather more difficult. *NM*
13/05/2010 10:17:47 PM
- 260 Views
What do you suggest I do, pray tell? *NM*
13/05/2010 10:19:30 PM
- 244 Views
Learn how to live with people who disagree with you.
13/05/2010 10:21:08 PM
- 536 Views
Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:29:38 PM
- 653 Views
Do you really spell it "superiour" in Britain? That's wonderful.
13/05/2010 10:37:21 PM
- 679 Views
Pretty please with sugar on top
13/05/2010 10:50:48 PM
- 607 Views
Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:02:11 PM
- 583 Views
Re: Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:03:42 PM
- 534 Views
Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:08:48 PM
- 568 Views
Re: Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:11:04 PM
- 573 Views
I don't mind transference of anger, but let's keep my quotes accurate at least.
13/05/2010 11:15:37 PM
- 573 Views
See, this is what I find offensive
13/05/2010 11:21:28 PM
- 566 Views
Fair enough. It was unfair of me to use "learn."
13/05/2010 11:30:34 PM
- 560 Views
Two posts in three days about a new Government in the country?
13/05/2010 11:18:06 PM
- 576 Views
This is so true
13/05/2010 11:29:30 PM
- 555 Views
Re: This is so true
13/05/2010 11:36:44 PM
- 559 Views
Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:48:26 PM
- 540 Views
Re: Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:54:10 PM
- 564 Views
I certainly wouldn't go that far. Nowhere near. *NM*
13/05/2010 11:43:20 PM
- 286 Views
On the comparison or on you people's spelling? *NM*
14/05/2010 12:13:42 AM
- 258 Views
They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:50:23 PM
- 522 Views
Re: They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:53:08 PM
- 565 Views
Eh, another time then.
13/05/2010 11:56:21 PM
- 590 Views
I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:43:12 PM
- 677 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:59:28 PM
- 573 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 11:16:07 PM
- 685 Views
I dunno. It looks to me that's what Balwer was saying with his flogged horse comment.
13/05/2010 11:18:30 PM
- 521 Views
I'm sorry you care more about your own political agenda than about trying to see a party in power
13/05/2010 11:44:32 PM
- 494 Views
You think Tories won't go proto-Orwellian on you?
13/05/2010 11:46:45 PM
- 514 Views
If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:54:53 PM
- 582 Views
Re: If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:58:17 PM
- 571 Views
If not a fan of Labour and not a fan of Tory, then
14/05/2010 12:01:37 AM
- 603 Views
Re: If not a fan of Labour and not a fan of Tory, then
14/05/2010 12:06:56 AM
- 602 Views
Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:55:17 PM
- 560 Views
Re: Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:59:58 PM
- 663 Views
A date "in a year's time" will be easy to remember. We have Scottish elections on 5 May 2011.
14/05/2010 12:12:26 PM
- 488 Views
People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 11:40:25 AM
- 625 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 01:05:44 PM
- 564 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 01:28:38 PM
- 677 Views