(and this is what has been annoying me about loads of usually intelligent people): it is unfair to judge a modern party based on what the party with the same name did in the past. 13 years mightn't seem like a long time, but it is these days, and the Conservatives are currently lead by a chap who is only 43. Young(er) people tend to be more ... liberal.
Mrs Thatcher was very much her own person - so much so, in fact, that she was ultimately brought down by a party rebellion. There's therefore no reason to suppose that the modern Tories will follow her footsteps. And I've seen that pundits are calling some of the younger chaps Thatcherites: based on what? They've not had any power at all. Comparisons are ridiculous at this point.
I'd be perfectly fine with you being this negative etc if they had given you reason to be recently. They haven't. They've been in Opposition. You actually cannot accurately gauge a party's policies and standards on their Opposition years because their job is to Oppose. That doesn't necessarily show their true colours.
Give it a year and come back to me then.
Mrs Thatcher was very much her own person - so much so, in fact, that she was ultimately brought down by a party rebellion. There's therefore no reason to suppose that the modern Tories will follow her footsteps. And I've seen that pundits are calling some of the younger chaps Thatcherites: based on what? They've not had any power at all. Comparisons are ridiculous at this point.
I'd be perfectly fine with you being this negative etc if they had given you reason to be recently. They haven't. They've been in Opposition. You actually cannot accurately gauge a party's policies and standards on their Opposition years because their job is to Oppose. That doesn't necessarily show their true colours.
Give it a year and come back to me then.
I will. Oh, I will. ' />
Deal.
I will order in a case of wine for the occasion.
Your belief in my tolerance for alcohol may be exaggerated.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
How to live with the Tories
13/05/2010 12:33:49 PM
- 959 Views
Her 101 reasons to love our Tory government was even better.
13/05/2010 12:42:39 PM
- 622 Views
What an even-handed, stereotype-free, and balanced piece of journalism. *NM*
13/05/2010 02:07:35 PM
- 293 Views
Your partisanship is getting annoying, actually.
13/05/2010 06:55:28 PM
- 694 Views
I'm sorry I care about politics.
13/05/2010 08:45:26 PM
- 635 Views
It's easy to complain. Actually doing something is rather more difficult. *NM*
13/05/2010 10:17:47 PM
- 260 Views
What do you suggest I do, pray tell? *NM*
13/05/2010 10:19:30 PM
- 244 Views
Learn how to live with people who disagree with you.
13/05/2010 10:21:08 PM
- 537 Views
Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:29:38 PM
- 654 Views
Do you really spell it "superiour" in Britain? That's wonderful.
13/05/2010 10:37:21 PM
- 680 Views
Pretty please with sugar on top
13/05/2010 10:50:48 PM
- 607 Views
Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:02:11 PM
- 583 Views
Re: Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:03:42 PM
- 535 Views
Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:08:48 PM
- 569 Views
Re: Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:11:04 PM
- 574 Views
I don't mind transference of anger, but let's keep my quotes accurate at least.
13/05/2010 11:15:37 PM
- 573 Views
See, this is what I find offensive
13/05/2010 11:21:28 PM
- 566 Views
Fair enough. It was unfair of me to use "learn."
13/05/2010 11:30:34 PM
- 561 Views
Two posts in three days about a new Government in the country?
13/05/2010 11:18:06 PM
- 576 Views
This is so true
13/05/2010 11:29:30 PM
- 556 Views
Re: This is so true
13/05/2010 11:36:44 PM
- 559 Views
Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:48:26 PM
- 541 Views
Re: Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:54:10 PM
- 565 Views
I certainly wouldn't go that far. Nowhere near. *NM*
13/05/2010 11:43:20 PM
- 286 Views
On the comparison or on you people's spelling? *NM*
14/05/2010 12:13:42 AM
- 259 Views
They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:50:23 PM
- 522 Views
Re: They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:53:08 PM
- 565 Views
Eh, another time then.
13/05/2010 11:56:21 PM
- 591 Views
I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:43:12 PM
- 678 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:59:28 PM
- 573 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 11:16:07 PM
- 685 Views
I dunno. It looks to me that's what Balwer was saying with his flogged horse comment.
13/05/2010 11:18:30 PM
- 521 Views
I'm sorry you care more about your own political agenda than about trying to see a party in power
13/05/2010 11:44:32 PM
- 495 Views
You think Tories won't go proto-Orwellian on you?
13/05/2010 11:46:45 PM
- 515 Views
If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:54:53 PM
- 583 Views
Re: If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:58:17 PM
- 571 Views
Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:55:17 PM
- 561 Views
Re: Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:59:58 PM
- 664 Views
A date "in a year's time" will be easy to remember. We have Scottish elections on 5 May 2011.
14/05/2010 12:12:26 PM
- 489 Views
People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 11:40:25 AM
- 626 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 01:05:44 PM
- 565 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 01:28:38 PM
- 677 Views