Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 13/05/2010 11:16:07 PM
If I said she was acting like that, sure. But I said "it can come across." All I meant was that posting more than one thread on the same topic in very rapid succession can annoy some people, in much the same way that Dragonsoul and traska's one-track style of posting annoys people. I think that was pretty clear from my post, but maybe it was worded ambiguously.
Two threads, with two days between them, and the later post was linking to an amusing article. Sure, Werthead posted another thread about the same thing at almost the same time two days ago, and there have been threads from others too, but that's hardly her fault.
Less ambiguously, then, I think the phrase "keep it in one thread" applies here. And yes, that should apply to US politics too, but as I very rarely create threads on US politics I don't exactly know why you're taking me to task on it.
"Keep it in one thread" is one thing, but that wasn't what Greg was complaining about, it wasn't what people were ganging up on her about, and it wasn't what your previous two posts were about.
And as for why I take you to task and not someone else: the usual reason, yours was the one reply too many that made it look like everybody ganging up on her for no good reason that I can see.
How to live with the Tories
13/05/2010 12:33:49 PM
- 1027 Views
Her 101 reasons to love our Tory government was even better.
13/05/2010 12:42:39 PM
- 689 Views
What an even-handed, stereotype-free, and balanced piece of journalism. *NM*
13/05/2010 02:07:35 PM
- 321 Views
Your partisanship is getting annoying, actually.
13/05/2010 06:55:28 PM
- 763 Views
I'm sorry I care about politics.
13/05/2010 08:45:26 PM
- 704 Views
It's easy to complain. Actually doing something is rather more difficult. *NM*
13/05/2010 10:17:47 PM
- 292 Views
What do you suggest I do, pray tell? *NM*
13/05/2010 10:19:30 PM
- 276 Views
Learn how to live with people who disagree with you.
13/05/2010 10:21:08 PM
- 608 Views
Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:29:38 PM
- 728 Views
Do you really spell it "superiour" in Britain? That's wonderful.
13/05/2010 10:37:21 PM
- 755 Views
Pretty please with sugar on top
13/05/2010 10:50:48 PM
- 680 Views
Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:02:11 PM
- 650 Views
Re: Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:03:42 PM
- 615 Views
Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:08:48 PM
- 638 Views
Re: Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:11:04 PM
- 641 Views
I don't mind transference of anger, but let's keep my quotes accurate at least.
13/05/2010 11:15:37 PM
- 647 Views

See, this is what I find offensive
13/05/2010 11:21:28 PM
- 643 Views
Fair enough. It was unfair of me to use "learn."
13/05/2010 11:30:34 PM
- 622 Views
Two posts in three days about a new Government in the country?
13/05/2010 11:18:06 PM
- 652 Views
This is so true
13/05/2010 11:29:30 PM
- 617 Views
Re: This is so true
13/05/2010 11:36:44 PM
- 630 Views
Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:48:26 PM
- 615 Views
Re: Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:54:10 PM
- 607 Views
I certainly wouldn't go that far. Nowhere near. *NM*
13/05/2010 11:43:20 PM
- 317 Views
On the comparison or on you people's spelling?
*NM*
14/05/2010 12:13:42 AM
- 289 Views

They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:50:23 PM
- 600 Views
Re: They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:53:08 PM
- 638 Views
Eh, another time then.
13/05/2010 11:56:21 PM
- 667 Views
I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:43:12 PM
- 742 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:59:28 PM
- 643 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 11:16:07 PM
- 760 Views
I dunno. It looks to me that's what Balwer was saying with his flogged horse comment.
13/05/2010 11:18:30 PM
- 567 Views
I'm sorry you care more about your own political agenda than about trying to see a party in power
13/05/2010 11:44:32 PM
- 570 Views
You think Tories won't go proto-Orwellian on you?
13/05/2010 11:46:45 PM
- 556 Views
If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:54:53 PM
- 653 Views
Re: If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:58:17 PM
- 647 Views
Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:55:17 PM
- 635 Views
Re: Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:59:58 PM
- 738 Views
A date "in a year's time" will be easy to remember. We have Scottish elections on 5 May 2011.
14/05/2010 12:12:26 PM
- 558 Views
People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 11:40:25 AM
- 706 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 01:05:44 PM
- 639 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 01:28:38 PM
- 755 Views