1)2+3 normally is 5
to get 5 from 10, you multiply by 2
2)7+2 normally is 9
to get 63 from 9 you multiple by 7
*pattern recognition*
alter into mathematically neutral equations to check. Theoretically, if that is the pattern, every equation should fit.
1b) 2=x, 3=y. x+y=(x+y)*x!!!
Use other equation to check work (this is NOT guess and check. I did not arrive at the original answer by guessing)
2b) 7=y, 2=x. x+y=(x+y)*x!!
3b) 6+5=(6+5)*6 <---x+y=(x+y)*x (this is where I stopped)
4b) 8+4=
+4)*8 <----x+y=(x+y)*x
Use projected solution to attempt to solve puzzle (again, this is not guess and check.)
9+7=(9+7)*9=144=correct
Strictly speaking, you are correct, it is not a "logical problem" (although I've seen PLENTY of published puzzles that are called logic problems that aren't.), but it is not merely "I'm going to randomly try shit until it works".
All that this problem required was the ability to break down the given "equations" and recognize the pattern when it danced in front of you like a naked marionette.
As mentioned, the "equation" presentation was a bit misleading, but I chose to present it how it was presented to me.
to get 5 from 10, you multiply by 2
2)7+2 normally is 9
to get 63 from 9 you multiple by 7
*pattern recognition*
alter into mathematically neutral equations to check. Theoretically, if that is the pattern, every equation should fit.
1b) 2=x, 3=y. x+y=(x+y)*x!!!
Use other equation to check work (this is NOT guess and check. I did not arrive at the original answer by guessing)
2b) 7=y, 2=x. x+y=(x+y)*x!!
3b) 6+5=(6+5)*6 <---x+y=(x+y)*x (this is where I stopped)
4b) 8+4=

Use projected solution to attempt to solve puzzle (again, this is not guess and check.)
9+7=(9+7)*9=144=correct
Strictly speaking, you are correct, it is not a "logical problem" (although I've seen PLENTY of published puzzles that are called logic problems that aren't.), but it is not merely "I'm going to randomly try shit until it works".
All that this problem required was the ability to break down the given "equations" and recognize the pattern when it danced in front of you like a naked marionette.
As mentioned, the "equation" presentation was a bit misleading, but I chose to present it how it was presented to me.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 10/05/2010 at 10:22:02 PM
A Logic Problem
09/05/2010 09:24:36 PM
- 1114 Views
I despise these sorts of problems (spoiler)
09/05/2010 09:38:41 PM
- 831 Views
that is correct (now no looking ahead, cheaters
) *NM*
09/05/2010 09:43:35 PM
- 376 Views

Based on the view count I would say at least half the people have decided to cheat
*NM*
09/05/2010 09:52:42 PM
- 373 Views

Not bad. Try this one.
09/05/2010 10:21:42 PM
- 793 Views
That's going to bug me for ages now.
09/05/2010 11:48:07 PM
- 710 Views
You would need a good base in math to figure it out. *NM*
10/05/2010 12:03:09 AM
- 394 Views
I'm a little confused by this. *kind of spoiler*
10/05/2010 12:12:37 AM
- 680 Views
I thought of that, but that doesn't seem to lead anywhere, so dropped that line of thought...
10/05/2010 12:16:04 AM
- 733 Views
Yeah, probably 99.9% of people won't get this, but it has less to do with patterns I think (spoiler)
10/05/2010 12:21:06 AM
- 728 Views
I never like base change ones, let me see if I can remember one...
10/05/2010 01:28:06 AM
- 764 Views
To save confusion, anyone who gets that just give it in base 10 *NM*
10/05/2010 01:52:45 AM
- 382 Views
Ths is not a logic problem. It's a puzzle.
10/05/2010 02:33:19 PM
- 623 Views
Re: No no, there's a definite pattern.
10/05/2010 06:50:01 PM
- 640 Views
ok, how do you analyze the problem?
10/05/2010 08:08:21 PM
- 757 Views
Here's how I thought of it.
10/05/2010 10:20:10 PM
- 741 Views
thanks for the explanation. and a reminder that I LOATHE that kind of stuff. *NM*
10/05/2010 10:26:32 PM
- 393 Views
Re: I like things like these, because while I don't think they mean anything about how smart I am,
10/05/2010 06:52:07 PM
- 749 Views
My settings allow me to automatically see white text. Couldn't help but see the answer. *NM*
11/05/2010 04:53:11 PM
- 364 Views