So what would you move to? A system where you wouldn't have districts but you vote for the party?
------------------------------------------------
Or would you have a system with instant run off voting? For the people who don't know how instant run off voting works here is how.
You list your first choice, second choice, third choice, etc when you vote.
Assume we have an election where the total precinct has these results as their first choice.
Conservative 40%
Lib Dem 35%
Labour 25%
Since Conservative doesn't have a 50% share, than the people who voted for the least popular party would have their party drop out. In this case Labour. Since the Labour votes were drop out the people who voted for Labour would then have their second choice decide the election. If the second choice for the Labour voters were 50% Conservative and 50% Tory than that 25% would be split 12.5% and 12.5% and now the totals would be Conservative 52.5% and Lib Dem 47.5%, thus the Conservatives would win. But if the Labour voters had for their second choice 35% Conservative and 65% Lib Dem, than the 25% would be split 8.75% Conservative and 16.25% Lib Dem making the final totals 51.25% Lib Dem and 48.75% Conservative.
------------------------------------------------
Or some combination of the two. You have two votes and one vote determines your precinct/district representative and another vote that determines your party representative? If this is your system would you have one house or two?
Edit: corrected some grammar
------------------------------------------------
Or would you have a system with instant run off voting? For the people who don't know how instant run off voting works here is how.
You list your first choice, second choice, third choice, etc when you vote.
Assume we have an election where the total precinct has these results as their first choice.
Conservative 40%
Lib Dem 35%
Labour 25%
Since Conservative doesn't have a 50% share, than the people who voted for the least popular party would have their party drop out. In this case Labour. Since the Labour votes were drop out the people who voted for Labour would then have their second choice decide the election. If the second choice for the Labour voters were 50% Conservative and 50% Tory than that 25% would be split 12.5% and 12.5% and now the totals would be Conservative 52.5% and Lib Dem 47.5%, thus the Conservatives would win. But if the Labour voters had for their second choice 35% Conservative and 65% Lib Dem, than the 25% would be split 8.75% Conservative and 16.25% Lib Dem making the final totals 51.25% Lib Dem and 48.75% Conservative.
------------------------------------------------
Or some combination of the two. You have two votes and one vote determines your precinct/district representative and another vote that determines your party representative? If this is your system would you have one house or two?
Edit: corrected some grammar
This message last edited by Roland00 on 07/05/2010 at 09:57:26 AM
Lib Dems: Up 1% of the vote, down 10% of the seats.
07/05/2010 09:29:03 AM
- 1657 Views
So what would you move to?
07/05/2010 09:53:51 AM
- 937 Views
I imagine if the UK changes it will move to Proportional Representation
07/05/2010 10:04:38 AM
- 1036 Views
God I hate the British system
07/05/2010 10:24:35 AM
- 1073 Views
It's an excellent morning. Conservatives are at 301 right now. *NM*
07/05/2010 01:57:52 PM
- 558 Views
Indeed
07/05/2010 02:22:37 PM
- 1103 Views

I love how they're calling that option "The Coalition of the Losers".
07/05/2010 02:27:56 PM
- 1014 Views
They are? Where?
07/05/2010 02:38:01 PM
- 1147 Views
On the lovely BBC. Paxman, Robinson, Dimbleby et al.
07/05/2010 02:52:01 PM
- 1033 Views
Ah, we have it on but with the sound turned down - the subtitlers must be skipping that phrase
07/05/2010 03:13:57 PM
- 981 Views

The thing with PR is, the current vote results are a horrid predictor for PR vote results.
07/05/2010 03:45:58 PM
- 1027 Views
Re: The thing with PR is, the current vote results are a horrid predictor for PR vote results.
07/05/2010 03:52:19 PM
- 1060 Views
I'm sure it would be a setup for new elections in a few months if they did. *NM*
07/05/2010 02:40:49 PM
- 559 Views
I suspect we'll get one of those anyway.
07/05/2010 02:52:32 PM
- 1016 Views
What is the general consensus on who would win or lose from new elections?
07/05/2010 02:57:04 PM
- 1163 Views
I've not heard any comment on this yet. I might have missed some.
07/05/2010 02:58:00 PM
- 1041 Views
Not being talked about yet - I'd guess whoever is PM will lose though
07/05/2010 03:21:23 PM
- 1166 Views
Re: Not being talked about yet - I'd guess whoever is PM will lose though
07/05/2010 03:29:37 PM
- 1145 Views
Re: Not being talked about yet - I'd guess whoever is PM will lose though
07/05/2010 04:04:03 PM
- 1045 Views
I suspect a great deal of the problem is George Osborn
07/05/2010 04:09:51 PM
- 1057 Views
Re: I suspect a great deal of the problem is George Osborn
07/05/2010 04:24:56 PM
- 932 Views
I'm sure he is
07/05/2010 04:25:20 PM
- 1059 Views
Heh.
07/05/2010 04:27:44 PM
- 1102 Views
Re: Heh.
07/05/2010 04:43:18 PM
- 1100 Views
His talking about "Portillo moments" was one of the best parts of the BBC's election broadcast. *NM*
07/05/2010 08:14:11 PM
- 620 Views
If they got PR as part of the deal it would be worth it
07/05/2010 02:42:36 PM
- 1151 Views
Possibly.
07/05/2010 02:53:28 PM
- 1168 Views
Re: Possibly.
07/05/2010 03:00:55 PM
- 958 Views
Sylvia Hermon the independent unionist would probably support them as well
07/05/2010 02:44:35 PM
- 1063 Views
Re: Indeed
07/05/2010 03:45:00 PM
- 1063 Views

Re: Indeed
07/05/2010 03:59:41 PM
- 1151 Views

Well I'm fairly sure some Shinners have attended Tory conferences in the past
07/05/2010 04:05:56 PM
- 989 Views
The breakdown is pretty wack
07/05/2010 11:07:20 AM
- 996 Views
Tell me about it.
07/05/2010 11:14:44 AM
- 1016 Views
I'm in the Cities of London and Westminster constituency.
07/05/2010 11:56:04 AM
- 1043 Views
A simple change is all
07/05/2010 01:16:16 PM
- 1060 Views
Not that simple
07/05/2010 02:45:00 PM
- 1000 Views
Because my school was a polling station we used to get the day off every polling day
07/05/2010 02:51:18 PM
- 1159 Views

Re: Not that simple
07/05/2010 03:04:57 PM
- 1153 Views
PR is hardly too difficult to implement and is much more democratic
07/05/2010 02:48:01 PM
- 1025 Views
What's amazing is that the exit polls are actually looking astonishingly correct, now. Huh. *NM*
07/05/2010 03:35:12 PM
- 524 Views
As soon as i turned on the TV, i was being told the Exit polls must be wrong
07/05/2010 03:47:15 PM
- 973 Views
Oh, and the other interesting thing will be seeing whether the Conservatives offer....
07/05/2010 03:57:52 PM
- 1124 Views
Until you bring Lady Thatcher back, all of your elections are just pick-the-least-offensive anyway. *NM*
07/05/2010 04:08:32 PM
- 530 Views
Well her son is good at starting coups, so maybe he might be hired for her return. *NM*
07/05/2010 04:28:52 PM
- 560 Views
Whatever it takes.
*NM*
07/05/2010 04:31:13 PM
- 502 Views

Please no, the milk stealer is still used to frighten children in Scotland
07/05/2010 04:47:26 PM
- 986 Views
OK here is the map of England by constituency, blue Tory, red NUlab
07/05/2010 05:00:20 PM
- 1009 Views
So I'm just one of those upstart colonists....explain to me what is going on....
07/05/2010 05:26:59 PM
- 992 Views
Basically...
07/05/2010 06:43:10 PM
- 1026 Views
And things are changing already
08/05/2010 04:08:47 PM
- 1100 Views
I thought they weren't allowed to do that if Brown isn't Prime Minister?
08/05/2010 04:52:39 PM
- 1070 Views
If i were the tories
07/05/2010 11:28:43 PM
- 1046 Views
That is hilarious. Both Brown and Dimbleby have been around for a while, huh?
07/05/2010 11:59:58 PM
- 1340 Views
Re: That is hilarious. Both Brown and Dimbleby have been around for a while, huh?
08/05/2010 06:11:38 PM
- 1090 Views
Hmmm
13/05/2010 12:08:04 PM
- 1364 Views
How was he supposed to know that at the time he made the post?
13/05/2010 09:52:24 PM
- 1459 Views
Re: How was he supposed to know that at the time he made the post?
13/05/2010 10:59:35 PM
- 1058 Views