Active Users:1153 Time:23/11/2024 12:37:15 AM
Big fucking deal. Coalitions of less than 5 parties = LAME *NM* AgentOrange Send a noteboard - 28/04/2010 12:03:36 AM
I enjoy following elections in countries where I cannot vote. Sometimes I think I like it better than when I can vote. Perhaps because I don't have as much invested, or perhaps because I don't have to make a choice. Or perhaps because the Norwegian system is somehow more sinsible (or, more likely, the crazy stuff does not stand out for me because I grew up with it).

Yesterday was another moment of glory. I read that Nick Clegg had said that Brown could not expect to continue to be Prime Minister if he lost the election and came third of the parties. My brain said "yeeeeees?", wondering a little if Clegg had run out of things to talk about since he had apparently turned to statements of the obvious.

But. And here is the wonderful thing that makes following British politics a bit like a glorious car boot sale: today's paper makes clear (what it probably assumed I knew yesterday) that there is in fact a "constitutional convention" that in a hung parliament the Prime Minister is allowed to try to form a government first. So there is a genuine possibility that a man with the least votes gets to be PM. What happens if the LibDems turn down Labour the first time around (ie Gordon as PM) and then when it becomes their turn decides to run with Labour over Conservatives (which, let's face it, is the sensible thing to do for them), would Brown then say yes? Does anyone know?

Also, why would Clegg want a coalition with the Conservatives? He doesn't agree with a word they say!


Edit: had an epiphany.
Reply to message
British politics is ... like a basket of crazy muffins. But they taste nice. - 26/04/2010 09:34:57 AM 785 Views
British politics or muffins taste nice? Or both? - 26/04/2010 10:52:35 AM 501 Views
Both - 26/04/2010 05:11:54 PM 672 Views
You are crazy in the head - 26/04/2010 05:20:06 PM 538 Views
Re: You are crazy in the head - 26/04/2010 05:23:00 PM 453 Views
Indeed - 26/04/2010 11:01:30 AM 563 Views
Re: Indeed - 26/04/2010 11:06:10 AM 494 Views
Didn't mean to put the effectively in there - 26/04/2010 11:17:20 AM 448 Views
That makes more sense - 26/04/2010 11:24:33 AM 584 Views
They've been trying to work out exactly what her powers are... - 26/04/2010 01:31:04 PM 652 Views
It is interesting - 26/04/2010 02:13:21 PM 517 Views
Re: Indeed - 26/04/2010 05:14:29 PM 665 Views
Yeah, I follow elections in lots of countries. - 26/04/2010 11:11:28 AM 616 Views
Re: Yeah, I follow elections in lots of countries. - 26/04/2010 05:17:55 PM 552 Views
Re: Yeah, I follow elections in lots of countries. - 26/04/2010 05:56:51 PM 472 Views
My sympathies - 26/04/2010 06:13:25 PM 769 Views
It's all very entertaining. - 26/04/2010 01:46:25 PM 543 Views
Re: It's all very entertaining. - 26/04/2010 05:21:25 PM 644 Views
- 28/04/2010 02:49:51 PM 590 Views
Im assuming youre back in your country now... - 26/04/2010 03:28:53 PM 524 Views
Well, not "my" country, technically, - 26/04/2010 05:22:20 PM 459 Views
I just like hearing them talk *NM* - 26/04/2010 06:25:05 PM 244 Views
So do they. *NM* - 26/04/2010 06:26:00 PM 222 Views
LOL! *NM* - 26/04/2010 06:33:02 PM 306 Views
Big fucking deal. Coalitions of less than 5 parties = LAME *NM* - 28/04/2010 12:03:36 AM 214 Views

Reply to Message