activist group liberal group claims it will cost money, what a shocker *NM*
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 27/04/2010 04:23:11 PM
This is no small matter in a state with a $3 billion deficit, where lawmakers recently took a cleaver to the budget and eliminated everything from parks funding to a health-care program for low-income kids. Last year, state lawmakers were hoping to hawk the Capitol building to generate some desperately needed cash.
The new law could add millions of dollars in costs to the state. The Immigration Policy Center, for instance, points to the estimated costs of a 2006 immigration bill that would have authorized police to arrest undocumented immigrants on trespassing charges (that measure ended up getting vetoed by then governor Janet Napolitano). The analysis, by the Yuma County sheriff, calculated that the measure would have cost, just in the first year, at least $21 million in jail expenses, at least $800,000 in attorney and staff fees, and at least $775,000 in processing expenses. And that was for just ONE of Arizona's 15 counties.
The measure is also likely to trigger a wave of lawsuits that could drain city and state coffers. According to a February 2008 report from the National Employment Law Project, many localities have faced steep legal costs after implementing harsh immigration ordinances. And beyond the potential pile-up of expenses, there's the lost revenue if immigrants decide to decamp the state. The IPC cites a study by the Perryman Group estimating that if all illegal immigrants were removed from Arizona, the state would lose more than $26 billion in economic activity. In such dire economic times, these numbers are downright scary.
Just glad I don't live in Arizona
The new law could add millions of dollars in costs to the state. The Immigration Policy Center, for instance, points to the estimated costs of a 2006 immigration bill that would have authorized police to arrest undocumented immigrants on trespassing charges (that measure ended up getting vetoed by then governor Janet Napolitano). The analysis, by the Yuma County sheriff, calculated that the measure would have cost, just in the first year, at least $21 million in jail expenses, at least $800,000 in attorney and staff fees, and at least $775,000 in processing expenses. And that was for just ONE of Arizona's 15 counties.
The measure is also likely to trigger a wave of lawsuits that could drain city and state coffers. According to a February 2008 report from the National Employment Law Project, many localities have faced steep legal costs after implementing harsh immigration ordinances. And beyond the potential pile-up of expenses, there's the lost revenue if immigrants decide to decamp the state. The IPC cites a study by the Perryman Group estimating that if all illegal immigrants were removed from Arizona, the state would lose more than $26 billion in economic activity. In such dire economic times, these numbers are downright scary.
Just glad I don't live in Arizona
The Arizona immigration bill thingy
26/04/2010 12:57:20 AM
- 2031 Views
what do you expect from one of the last states to accept MLK day?
26/04/2010 01:19:03 AM
- 1149 Views
Yes, well, at least you are in the 27% of Americans that have a Passport.
26/04/2010 01:48:44 AM
- 952 Views
It will only take a few times getting their asses sued off for detaining U.S. citizens against...
26/04/2010 05:54:49 AM
- 968 Views
Yeah, I can't wait 'til a Latino state representative is arrested for looking illegal.
26/04/2010 07:26:13 AM
- 849 Views
or even better, a celebrity. I choose Antonia Banderas (when he has the funky beard hobo look) *NM*
26/04/2010 12:32:18 PM
- 386 Views
Looks like no one knows how bad it is along the border
26/04/2010 06:19:24 AM
- 865 Views
Oh please! The immigration and drug problems don't justify bad legislation.
26/04/2010 07:02:54 AM
- 877 Views
Some thoughts
26/04/2010 06:42:02 AM
- 960 Views
It's not just outrageous; it's plain stupid. The latter is almost as offensive as the former.
26/04/2010 07:30:30 AM
- 876 Views
Sounds more like a bill to convince people they are doing something than to do something
26/04/2010 12:43:19 PM
- 839 Views
What I find interesting about all this...
26/04/2010 01:06:08 PM
- 935 Views
It is interesting to see how it contrasts with your take on it, being from a country with them
26/04/2010 02:11:18 PM
- 889 Views
Perhaps I'm wrong, but...
26/04/2010 01:49:13 PM
- 829 Views
I don't know about the green cards
26/04/2010 03:05:49 PM
- 869 Views
That last point doesn't really make any sense.
26/04/2010 03:20:19 PM
- 856 Views
my point was that the punishments for the similar crimes are so different.
26/04/2010 04:23:08 PM
- 804 Views
The law will be overturned but it may help to get the federal government off their collective ass
26/04/2010 02:59:11 PM
- 901 Views
The law will most likely not be overturned.
26/04/2010 03:13:24 PM
- 841 Views
The law will be overturned but it may help to get the federal government off their collective ass *NM*
26/04/2010 03:20:45 PM
- 435 Views
The law will be overturned but it may help to get the federal government off their collective ass *NM*
26/04/2010 06:53:32 PM
- 386 Views
The law will be overturned but it may help to get the federal government off their collective ass *NM*
26/04/2010 08:33:04 PM
- 409 Views
The federal government will be collective ass but it may help to get the law off their overturned *NM*
27/04/2010 05:33:42 AM
- 405 Views
Their collective ass will be overturned but it may help to get the law off the federal government *NM*
27/04/2010 09:18:02 AM
- 380 Views
It's interesting how this sort of mirrors the Belgian issues.
26/04/2010 03:34:59 PM
- 847 Views
the "overrunning" of culture and language is exaggerated, imo
26/04/2010 04:34:56 PM
- 863 Views
I think the primary problem - in both cases - is language, yes.
26/04/2010 04:54:55 PM
- 883 Views
*shrug* I don't know. I just think that people are way too uptight about the issue
26/04/2010 05:02:30 PM
- 816 Views
the differences really are not that minor
28/04/2010 06:49:33 PM
- 864 Views
hmm, see
28/04/2010 07:10:42 PM
- 761 Views
I am from San Antonio I have always been able to buy burritos from my neighbors
28/04/2010 08:28:45 PM
- 785 Views
When I say relatively minor, it's because I'm thinking of those *other* assimilation problems here
28/04/2010 10:30:04 PM
- 1069 Views
It should rattle anyone who lives in a democracy and who likes their way of life
28/04/2010 11:15:18 PM
- 876 Views
More power to the government! and We took that land fair and square! *NM*
26/04/2010 04:43:15 PM
- 348 Views
I'm going to take a common sense approach on this for a minute
26/04/2010 09:05:21 PM
- 1074 Views
Re: I'm going to take a common sense approach on this for a minute
26/04/2010 11:48:14 PM
- 1171 Views
Will the will of the people of Arizona be respected?
27/04/2010 12:12:46 AM
- 929 Views
That's funny...
27/04/2010 01:57:14 AM
- 1139 Views
echo chamber much?
27/04/2010 04:14:53 PM
- 891 Views
there's also 53% of us who think this will lead to violating civil rights.
27/04/2010 05:19:29 PM
- 775 Views
Re: there's also 53% of us who think this will lead to violating civil rights.
28/04/2010 12:40:42 PM
- 833 Views
Also, the potential economic consequences of the law could be severe for Arizona.
27/04/2010 01:03:54 AM
- 866 Views
activist group liberal group claims it will cost money, what a shocker *NM*
27/04/2010 04:23:11 PM
- 374 Views
It will cost money
27/04/2010 09:16:31 PM
- 846 Views
but all of that ignores the long term savings
28/04/2010 03:24:50 PM
- 775 Views
it's less a matter of american tourism
28/04/2010 04:06:50 PM
- 826 Views
if they law is enforced it will decrease the number of illegals who go to Arizona
28/04/2010 06:35:26 PM
- 892 Views
I don't see any real long term savings coming from this.
28/04/2010 10:17:26 PM
- 884 Views
70% of the people in Arizona support the new law and 30% of the state is Hispanic
28/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
- 1041 Views
real science?
28/04/2010 11:06:13 PM
- 818 Views
I linked to it further up the thread and you responded
28/04/2010 11:19:51 PM
- 800 Views