Suppose you have two independent clauses conjoined: "I like owlbears, and you like hobgoblins." The comma is necessary, of course.
But suppose the sentence were more like this: "Suppose I like owlbears(,) and you like hobgoblins."
Here I would say the subject is the implied "you", the verb "suppose", and the entire clause "I like owlbears and you like hobgoblins" is the object of the verb. Having said that, I do still think you need the comma between "owlbears" and "and", since they are still independent clauses, whatever function they are serving in the overall sentence.
Or this: "Suppose that I like owlbears(,) and you like hobgoblins."
Same as above only it reads slightly better, and I would actually have heard an implied "that" after suppose in the first sentence.
Or this: "Suppose that I like owlbears(,) and that you like hobgoblins."
This is the only place where I do not think you need a comma, since "that you like hobgoblins" is no longer an independent clause. Then "that I like owlbears" and "that you like hobgoblins" form a list of things that you should suppose, and you wouldn't separate the items in a list of 2 with commas. In other words, you wouldn't say, "I like the colors green, and blue."
Although I wonder if for the sake of parallelism that 2nd "that" is implied as well, meaning you shouldn't use a comma for any of the 3 examples?
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
I cast Summon Grammar Nazi.
23/04/2010 02:24:27 AM
- 1368 Views
I think the first 2 are OK either way, but the third is wrong (essential clause). *NM*
23/04/2010 03:44:10 AM
- 310 Views
I like owlbears and you, like hobgoblins.
23/04/2010 03:59:31 AM
- 423 Views
I imagine someone speaking in a Tonto voice, with the sentence structured like that. *NM*
06/05/2010 03:07:39 AM
- 319 Views
Actually, you don't need the comma in your first sentence.
23/04/2010 08:37:42 AM
- 388 Views
Mmm, yes he does.
23/04/2010 03:38:06 PM
- 362 Views
Depends on the independent clauses.
23/04/2010 04:58:27 PM
- 354 Views
Not in American English, it doesn't.
23/04/2010 05:13:15 PM
- 391 Views
I actually like the "that" but I'm not Bekah.
23/04/2010 03:01:37 PM
- 333 Views
Depending on the inflection used...
23/04/2010 03:26:26 PM
- 341 Views
Fair point; so is knowing to whom you speak.
23/04/2010 04:04:30 PM
- 329 Views
except that is an improper use of a semicolon.
23/04/2010 04:24:00 PM
- 340 Views
If a comma is appropriate in the original supposition, then the semicolon is necessary here.
23/04/2010 11:24:20 PM
- 329 Views
but
24/04/2010 03:03:22 AM
- 316 Views
I believe it's treated like one. The comma takes the place of the verb. *NM*
24/04/2010 03:23:38 PM
- 299 Views
Re: Fair point; so is knowing to whom you speak.
23/04/2010 06:33:58 PM
- 356 Views
Your pro-elf anti-hobgoblin prejudice has been obvious for some time, Marge.
28/04/2010 02:41:41 AM
- 308 Views
Hobgoblins killed my elf friend.
28/04/2010 01:40:22 PM
- 329 Views
Jesus built my hotrod.
04/05/2010 05:38:02 PM
- 356 Views
I think my friend was perfectly justified...
04/05/2010 06:40:05 PM
- 356 Views
So the truth comes out: Nothing more than interspecies homophobia.
04/05/2010 06:57:56 PM
- 369 Views
Dude. You know sisters are off limits.
05/05/2010 01:22:49 PM
- 349 Views
So, what, they're supposed to die old maids?
06/05/2010 02:57:46 PM
- 338 Views
Of course not.
07/05/2010 02:07:36 PM
- 362 Views
Apologies for the delay.
18/10/2011 02:48:00 PM
- 282 Views
Necromancy is generally frowned upon.
18/10/2011 03:00:05 PM
- 354 Views
I was unaware of your response until yesterday, and wanted to acknowledge it.
18/10/2011 03:14:12 PM
- 278 Views
Dude, WTF! This thread is like a year and a half old
18/10/2011 08:58:14 PM
- 272 Views
No need for commas in either of the lats 3 examples. *NM*
23/04/2010 03:02:38 PM
- 319 Views
You have Latvian lats? It's a sort of worthless currency for trading purposes. *NM*
23/04/2010 04:46:07 PM
- 344 Views
Re: I cast Summon Grammar Nazi.
23/04/2010 03:45:31 PM
- 362 Views
I tap three mana and cast Cancel. *NM*
23/04/2010 05:26:17 PM
- 332 Views
It won't work, the only way to banish the Grammar Nazi is with Text Messages
23/04/2010 11:41:51 PM
- 354 Views
You get...300 exposition points, a scroll of open/close quotes, and a direct object. *NM*
24/04/2010 02:32:48 AM
- 320 Views
Apparently someone also cast Necromancy (Resurrect Deceased Thread). *NM*
18/10/2011 07:30:02 PM
- 256 Views