So the question is: If a a soldier is dishonorably discharged (as DADT dictates), is that individual still bound by military regulations for veterans?
If I understand DADT correctly the discharge is a general discharge under other than honorable conditions.
Civilians shorten that to 'Dishonorable Discharge' but that's not accurate. They aren't the same classification.
General discharges are for lots of different things. For instance, a person who joins the military but flunks basic used to be given a general discharge. Eventually the military realized that the civvies couldn't keep that straight from a dishonorable discharge and changed the policy so that they weren't 'discharged' at all - just kind of written off as though they had never joined up.
Dishonorable discharges are for those folks who have committed crimes and been kicked out of the military. Stealing, rape, robbing banks, desertion, that kind of thing.
General Discharge under other than honorable conditions are sort of administrative discharges. DADT falls under this category. It does still deny you your benefits etc. and is still generally seen as leaving under a cloud but it's not actually dishonorable.
And of course an Honorable Discharge is 'You completed your term of service and were discharged at the end having done your duty.' Full benefits etc. apply.
Most civilians, as I said, don't really get the distinction and think that there are only two.
As to the regs - I've never heard of them actually being enforced on someone who is no longer part of the military. It's probably happened, but I've never heard of it. So I don't honestly know.
May God stand between you and harm in all the empty places you must walk.
Old Egyptian Blessing
Old Egyptian Blessing
I'm in favor of repealing DADT, but this made me briefly reconsider
- 21/04/2010 05:29:45 AM
1265 Views
...did you read the article? They aren't in the military any more. *NM*
- 21/04/2010 05:31:02 AM
370 Views
Really? A few months ago Lt. Choi was still in the military, I didn't realize he'd been discharged
- 21/04/2010 05:37:47 AM
767 Views
No, in or out it's a no-go
- 21/04/2010 05:48:25 AM
767 Views
There needs to be a rule that stops soldiers from wearing uniforms in bars
- 21/04/2010 06:55:37 AM
704 Views
Grabbing a beer with the guys after work is a pretty normal thing
- 21/04/2010 07:45:16 AM
734 Views
I've seen it.
- 21/04/2010 12:52:59 PM
707 Views
Not a very fair way to look at it
- 21/04/2010 02:10:47 PM
747 Views
perhaps not on its own
- 21/04/2010 07:06:09 PM
673 Views
Sadly that's not that uncommon
- 21/04/2010 07:27:45 PM
779 Views
to be honest, I've probably met plenty of wonderful military people in the bars
- 21/04/2010 07:41:30 PM
737 Views
every think the problem might be the uptight college kids? *NM*
- 22/04/2010 05:10:08 PM
314 Views
Excepting possibly finals period, I'm pretty sure "uptight college kid" is an oxymoron. *NM*
- 22/04/2010 07:07:58 PM
322 Views
uptight college kids don't go drink in Aggieville.
- 22/04/2010 07:17:17 PM
935 Views
The navy and Marine do have rules against it at least for working uniforms
- 21/04/2010 04:06:10 PM
743 Views
Like Buzz Aldrin wearing his on Dancing with the Stars. Ugh. *NM*
- 21/04/2010 02:37:59 PM
340 Views
well that was an air force uniform so it really doesn't count as military
- 21/04/2010 04:00:27 PM
898 Views
- 21/04/2010 04:00:27 PM
898 Views
I'll remind you of that next time you want air support ;-)
- 21/04/2010 06:00:32 PM
763 Views
I am a Marine we have our own air support
- 21/04/2010 06:15:01 PM
679 Views
- 21/04/2010 06:15:01 PM
679 Views
Yeah - some of it pretty good too but still all small stuff
- 21/04/2010 07:26:12 PM
717 Views
The F/A18 does OK
- 21/04/2010 10:11:13 PM
649 Views
It's all right, but not the best choice
- 22/04/2010 04:30:07 PM
716 Views
Hm. That seems to violate some significant 1st Amendment rights.
- 21/04/2010 07:00:59 PM
687 Views
you forget that the military sign away their rights. *NM*
- 21/04/2010 07:06:52 PM
344 Views
That's why I specified dishonorably discharged. They're no longer in the military.
- 21/04/2010 08:43:22 PM
727 Views
*shrug* sorry, I'm a bit cynical over how much the military EVER lets go.
- 21/04/2010 10:13:51 PM
692 Views
Re: I'm in favor of repealing DADT, but this made me briefly reconsider
- 21/04/2010 05:36:48 AM
708 Views
Not in uniform.
- 21/04/2010 05:38:50 AM
828 Views
oh puhlease
- 21/04/2010 05:43:15 AM
773 Views
It's not a just a piece of clothing, but I guess we'll agree to disagree on that.
- 21/04/2010 05:45:52 AM
748 Views
and another thing
- 21/04/2010 05:38:53 AM
738 Views
I'm on their side, BUT
- 21/04/2010 05:44:00 AM
718 Views
Well... it's a military policy. If they were protesting animal cruelty while wearing it, I'd agree
- 21/04/2010 06:53:36 AM
919 Views
What beetnemesis said. They're not talking about rights for all gays, but rights for gay soldiers.
- 21/04/2010 09:54:09 AM
690 Views
It's peaceful and non-violent. I see nothing wrong with them making their point in this in addition
- 21/04/2010 02:12:54 PM
683 Views
A soldier protesting a military doctrine has the right.
- 21/04/2010 02:28:40 PM
790 Views
they don't have the right to use the uniform to make that free expression *NM*
- 21/04/2010 02:39:45 PM
309 Views
Take it up with congress, the regulations are clear, no such right exists, it is expressly banned *NM*
- 21/04/2010 02:46:14 PM
281 Views
The uniform isn't just handed to you after Basic with no strings attached.
- 21/04/2010 03:04:32 PM
775 Views
The funny thing about it is
- 21/04/2010 03:35:51 PM
822 Views
Re: The funny thing about it is
- 21/04/2010 10:12:57 PM
692 Views
Actually -the question isn't right
- 22/04/2010 04:38:03 PM
592 Views
I think your attitude is likely to be common among active duty and vets alike.
- 21/04/2010 02:44:29 PM
709 Views
Actually, darlin', we don't have to convince them.
- 21/04/2010 03:34:49 PM
697 Views
very true
- 21/04/2010 03:51:49 PM
731 Views
But these men didn't disrespect anything.
- 21/04/2010 04:09:20 PM
772 Views
the problem is uniforms are about more than everyone dressing the same
- 21/04/2010 05:55:31 PM
788 Views
The statistics show that nearly 70% of Americans think gay men and women should serve openly.
- 21/04/2010 04:14:33 PM
667 Views
And going back to the Truman example, he doesn't even have to show Truman's courage.
- 21/04/2010 04:17:02 PM
706 Views
Re: And going back to the Truman example, he doesn't even have to show Truman's courage.
- 21/04/2010 04:25:46 PM
725 Views
That dude is all talk about everything.
- 21/04/2010 04:27:07 PM
826 Views
Well he wasn't all talk about Health care
- 22/04/2010 04:44:39 PM
781 Views
Yes, the main thing he has followed through on is the most disastrous.
- 22/04/2010 04:59:45 PM
587 Views
Civil disobedience against immoral government action often involves breaking the rules. *NM*
- 21/04/2010 03:37:36 PM
338 Views
Wow,
- 21/04/2010 04:04:42 PM
704 Views
I'm sure female protesters made a lot of people reconsider the suffrage movement.
- 21/04/2010 04:09:37 PM
862 Views
The bravey of those men is exactly what that 'clothing' stands for.
- 21/04/2010 04:20:19 PM
784 Views