Re: I second Aemon but a couple drawbacks - Edit 1
Before modification by Aemon at 04/09/2009 04:50:25 PM
1) Looking back at something earlier in the book is harder than a real book. Thus for longer books, I am not sure I would want to read this way. Or for books where you need to go back and understand a clue from earlier. Of course you could bookmark the spot and perhaps as I get more adept at using the Kindle, that will be easier, but right now it is much easier for me to find a particular place in a hard copy of a book than in an ebook.
It's a little harder if you do it occasionally, yeah, due to the screen refresh rate of a half second or so. It's easier if you do it a lot though, because of the bookmarks. Very easy to mark places for reference and instantly jump back there. I'd say this one could go either way. Good point, though.
2) Sometimes I like to read in the bathtub. I would never advise using your Kindle when doing so. I don't suppose it holds enough electricity to electrocute you if you drop it, but I wouldn't think that being totally immersed in water is a good thing for it. Of course, being totally immersed in water isn't really good for a book either, but having dropped a book in water before I would note that books, at least at first, float, so if you are quick enough in your reactions you can usually save the book without too much temporary damage and no permanent damage.
This is actually easier with a reader. Just buy a waterproof cover, and you're fine. There's no way to read a book within a cover, obviously, but with a reader you you turn pages by pressing a button. If you want, you can even make a ghetto cover by sealing it inside a ziplock bag or two. I wouldn't take it underwater like that, but it'll protect against accidental drops in the tub just fine.
With a cover, you can even read in the shower if you want.
