Active Users:866 Time:24/11/2024 10:38:27 AM
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. Camilla Send a noteboard - 14/03/2010 10:56:54 AM

Have you read Sherlock Holmes Was Wrong by Pierre Bayard? He grounds it in some dubious psychology, but the main part of it, where he picks apart The Hound of the Baskervilles is very good.


Had to re-read Hound of the Baskervilles along with it... along with the Agatha Christie he includes. Can't remember which one that is now.

I do remember being upset that I hadn't read one of the books he dissects, so then I knew the answer, as it were. The right and the wrong one. :P


The Ackroyd book, wasn't it?
I haven't read Bayard's take on that.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
Unreliable narrators: yay or nay? Or neigh? And if so, and you are a horse, how are you typing? - 12/03/2010 05:20:09 AM 775 Views
Re: Unreliable narrators: yay or nay? Or neigh? And if so, and you are a horse, how are you typing? - 12/03/2010 09:12:23 AM 594 Views
I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 12/03/2010 11:55:09 PM 530 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 14/03/2010 10:56:54 AM 594 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 16/03/2010 10:37:35 PM 564 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 16/03/2010 10:39:13 PM 552 Views
Yes. - 17/03/2010 05:01:31 PM 589 Views
Re: Yes. - 17/03/2010 07:53:38 PM 480 Views
I don't mind either way. - 12/03/2010 10:18:03 AM 582 Views
Your face is an unreliable horse! - 12/03/2010 10:25:32 AM 586 Views
I think it's fairly logical that genre fiction doesn't employ it as often. - 12/03/2010 01:21:06 PM 750 Views
Well, isn't Erikson notable for his unreliable POVs? - 14/03/2010 12:57:25 AM 579 Views
Hm. Yeigh? - 12/03/2010 05:15:41 PM 645 Views
I like it when they are well written - 15/03/2010 08:44:02 AM 781 Views
Like anything else it is good when done right - 15/03/2010 10:32:48 PM 661 Views
I think because of our cynical nature - 19/03/2010 06:58:05 AM 551 Views

Reply to Message