Active Users:348 Time:04/04/2025 02:23:51 AM
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. Camilla Send a noteboard - 14/03/2010 10:56:54 AM

Have you read Sherlock Holmes Was Wrong by Pierre Bayard? He grounds it in some dubious psychology, but the main part of it, where he picks apart The Hound of the Baskervilles is very good.


Had to re-read Hound of the Baskervilles along with it... along with the Agatha Christie he includes. Can't remember which one that is now.

I do remember being upset that I hadn't read one of the books he dissects, so then I knew the answer, as it were. The right and the wrong one. :P


The Ackroyd book, wasn't it?
I haven't read Bayard's take on that.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
Unreliable narrators: yay or nay? Or neigh? And if so, and you are a horse, how are you typing? - 12/03/2010 05:20:09 AM 840 Views
Re: Unreliable narrators: yay or nay? Or neigh? And if so, and you are a horse, how are you typing? - 12/03/2010 09:12:23 AM 657 Views
I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 12/03/2010 11:55:09 PM 583 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 14/03/2010 10:56:54 AM 654 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 16/03/2010 10:37:35 PM 630 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 16/03/2010 10:39:13 PM 611 Views
Yes. - 17/03/2010 05:01:31 PM 648 Views
Re: Yes. - 17/03/2010 07:53:38 PM 538 Views
I don't mind either way. - 12/03/2010 10:18:03 AM 638 Views
Your face is an unreliable horse! - 12/03/2010 10:25:32 AM 641 Views
I think it's fairly logical that genre fiction doesn't employ it as often. - 12/03/2010 01:21:06 PM 804 Views
Well, isn't Erikson notable for his unreliable POVs? - 14/03/2010 12:57:25 AM 635 Views
Hm. Yeigh? - 12/03/2010 05:15:41 PM 706 Views
I like it when they are well written - 15/03/2010 08:44:02 AM 849 Views
Like anything else it is good when done right - 15/03/2010 10:32:48 PM 720 Views
I think because of our cynical nature - 19/03/2010 06:58:05 AM 608 Views

Reply to Message