Re: Unreliable narrators: yay or nay? Or neigh? And if so, and you are a horse, how are you typing? - Edit 1
Before modification by lord-of-shadow at 12/03/2010 06:56:42 PM
1. Do you go into a novel with the assumption that the narrator will be reliable? Why?
Yes. It's more common, basically.
2. Do you actively assess a narrator's reliability? Do you do it often? Are there triggers that make you stop and judge the narrator's reliability?
I generally don't even think about it until something happens to make me start wondering - some hint that the narrator might not be reliable. And when I get that hint, my brain starts analyzing the story in a whole different way than usual - it's always nice to stretch that less-practiced brain muscle.
3. Do you prefer books with unreliable narrators? Why?
Getting back to my title: I think the average book with an unreliable narrator is better than the average book without an unreliable narrator (assuming that all of the books in question are at least of passable reading value to weed out the chafe and keep this comparison meaningful). I don't think it's because an unreliable narrator makes for an inherently better story though; I think it's because only the more skilled or experienced authors tend to experiment with an unreliable narrator.