Active Users:1208 Time:22/11/2024 01:35:11 PM
Re: I'm going to be very unkind and possibly factually wrong here, since it has been a while. Danae al'Thor Send a noteboard - 14/02/2010 05:52:52 PM
But I am not sure Stephanie Meyer, as a writer, has a purpose for positively-written women or men who do not love.

I don't mean that she sees them only as hangers-on to male protagonists, but I've read these, and I've read her The Host, and all the time it seems to me that - amongst other things that make me wonder if I am a feminazi after all - the greatest passion she is able to characters with (male or female) is love. Romantic love especially.

Bella may have been a good character. but she was never allowed to have her very own plot. If you get what I mean? All of her plot was provided to her by other people, usually male, or male-accessed. These males were usually in love with her. This is a girl who has never really been alone, or sought something entirely for herself as an end that stands independently of other relationships not despite or inspite them but just of itself.

http://coolingpearls.wordpress.com/
http://uncategoricallyroh.wordpress.com/
http://whaq.blogspot.com/
~Roh
This message last edited by Danae al'Thor on 14/02/2010 at 05:53:46 PM
Reply to message
As I don't believe we've actually had a review of this yet... Stephenie Meyer's Twilight series. - 14/02/2010 04:08:51 PM 1384 Views
I think the series is codswallop...and that it DID have potential - 14/02/2010 04:59:56 PM 769 Views
As I said, the second book is better in some regards thanks to that. - 14/02/2010 05:06:29 PM 848 Views
I normally would agree with you - 14/02/2010 06:05:36 PM 699 Views
Re: I normally would agree with you - 15/02/2010 10:10:01 PM 642 Views
Re: Hey, I liked the Backstreet Boys. They sang me into puberty! - 14/02/2010 05:53:36 PM 638 Views
Re: I'm going to be very unkind and possibly factually wrong here, since it has been a while. - 14/02/2010 05:52:52 PM 767 Views
Yeah, absolutely true (spoilers). - 14/02/2010 06:14:58 PM 766 Views
maybe not anti-feminist... - 14/02/2010 06:21:44 PM 849 Views
Re: I think it gets labelled antifeminist because, well, it's Bella, the heroine, and she's so young - 14/02/2010 06:26:37 PM 936 Views
I love your point about the other "Strong women" - 14/02/2010 06:43:05 PM 741 Views
Re: What is LDS? *NM* - 14/02/2010 06:44:36 PM 297 Views
Probably, but that doesn't make them right. - 14/02/2010 07:11:19 PM 902 Views
Re: The point I was trying to make there, to some extent... - 14/02/2010 07:20:36 PM 681 Views
precisely - 14/02/2010 06:17:18 PM 693 Views
They lost me with twinkly vampires *NM* - 14/02/2010 09:22:01 PM 405 Views
I think it could have been sold better - 14/02/2010 09:35:07 PM 675 Views
Vampires should be tragic at best monsters at worst - 15/02/2010 04:58:15 PM 700 Views
I thought that was strange too - 15/02/2010 09:19:26 PM 707 Views
I think I would rather just eat people then be stuck in high school forever - 16/02/2010 09:22:07 PM 733 Views
You just had to do it, didn't you? *possible spoiler* - 15/02/2010 01:57:29 AM 1037 Views
yes *spoilers* - 15/02/2010 02:02:27 AM 779 Views
You haven't even read that book! *NM* - 15/02/2010 10:50:49 AM 289 Views
I've read more about it than I've cared to. *NM* - 15/02/2010 09:20:07 PM 276 Views
Yeah. It's one of those things that sound worse out of context than they are in the book itself... - 15/02/2010 10:57:47 AM 748 Views
Re: Monster Demon Baby! - 15/02/2010 12:56:39 PM 736 Views
Wow, dude. Just. Wow. *NM* - 16/02/2010 02:29:31 AM 281 Views
Great way to label this series... - 26/02/2010 07:40:47 PM 812 Views
I read a lot of PNR (paranormal romance for you book snobs out there) and thus have read these too. - 15/02/2010 09:55:54 PM 727 Views
I totally agree about book four. - 15/02/2010 10:02:43 PM 658 Views
Mormon fantasy...haha - 15/02/2010 10:06:58 PM 1136 Views
*lmao* There are gay men who like Edward? - 15/02/2010 10:12:37 PM 849 Views
Re: *lmao* There are gay men who like Edward? - 15/02/2010 10:16:32 PM 735 Views

Reply to Message