Active Users:361 Time:12/03/2025 12:21:29 PM
Don't knock the naked barbarian chicks PhotoJim Send a noteboard - 10/02/2010 02:18:09 PM
Back in the 70's that was what a fantasy book cover looked like. Now a fantasy book is usually a paranormal romance book instead or about vampires or dragons. The whim of the populace changes over time.
Everybody was Kung Fu fighting!

Not to be rude but who are you? And I suppose equally important, where are we?

The Wotmaniac formerly known as nomad.
Reply to message
Is it just me or is contemporary fantasy art crap? - 08/02/2010 02:37:40 AM 1047 Views
You might get a better response with this on the sci-fi/fantasy board. *NM* - 08/02/2010 06:50:24 AM 323 Views
Re: Is it just me or is contemporary fantasy art crap? - 08/02/2010 05:01:36 PM 698 Views
I don't know if it's crap, but I'm not sure I like it either - 08/02/2010 05:33:49 PM 786 Views
First, D&D 4.0 is marketed at WoW players. - 08/02/2010 07:44:47 PM 987 Views
Wait, you give Vallejo, Royo, and Bell as examples of art that shows something more believable? - 08/02/2010 08:00:53 PM 756 Views
my taste likes the art style... - 09/02/2010 01:41:18 AM 736 Views
Don't knock the naked barbarian chicks - 10/02/2010 02:18:09 PM 719 Views
Yes. I had an old Kull edition just like that - 10/02/2010 01:59:28 AM 709 Views
As far as D&D is concerned, yes. - 10/02/2010 12:53:46 AM 757 Views

Reply to Message