Active Users:1144 Time:23/11/2024 03:03:05 AM
Re: Censorship, promotion of books and dissemination of ideas. aria Send a noteboard - 05/02/2010 11:47:08 PM
Germany is now grappling with a proposed move to print and sell a new critical edition of Mein Kampf when Hitler's automatic 70-year postmortem copyright expires in 2015. It's not clear just yet that we'll be able to preorder so that amazon.de can make sure we get delivery on the day of its release (presumably May 1, 2015 would be the first available day), however. The Bavarian government has played the politically correct card to try to keep it from being published or sold in Germany, despite the fact that it is available everywhere else (and apparently very popular in Gaza).

On the one hand, the book is little more than an extended rant by a sociopath that tragically led to the implementation of most of what it advocated and the deaths of tens of millions of people. On the other hand, it bashes the French...I mean, on the other hand, precisely because of its consequences it is one of the "great books" of history ("infamous" is just as fitting an epithet as "great").

The article got me thinking about censorship of books and the dissemination of ideas, which led me to think about books that are affirmatively chosen for mandatory reading in schools as well. This train of thought was broken by a desire to have breakfast, but when I returned to it I decided to post a survey here.

1. Are there any books that should ever be censored? If so, why? If so, which ones? Who should decide what books are censored and for whom?


I think when it comes to censorship in schools, it depends on the grade level. Obviously younger children are not developmentally ready to be exposed to certain issues or themes. I think it should be up to the local school boards because communities are a lot smaller group to generalize by than by state or country. They should have an idea of the communities thoughts and feelings on certain issues and more able to decide what is appropriate. But again, that is for young children. I think it's different for older kids.


2. Should any books be withheld from libraries in high schools? If so, why? If so, which ones? Who should decide what books are withheld?


When you are talking high school age, I think that there are very few books that should be completely unavailable to students. For example, I saw the Joy of Sex on a banned book list, and while we all know high school students know plenty about sex, an instructional book on it probably isn't appropriate. But I think most books, even with controversial themes should be available. They are old enough to start thinking for themselves and they can't be sheltered forever.

3. Name five books (aside from religious works) that you think have had a massive impact on the world, and at least one that is frequently overlooked on lists of that sort.

4. Do you think any of the books you listed in point 3 should be read in schools as mandatory reading? Why or why not?

5. Name five books (aside from religious works) that you think SHOULD be mandatory reading in schools (or at least "on the curriculum" if you don't like the word "mandatory"), and why.


That's so hard to say. It really depends on what they are studying at different age levels. I can't think of particular books that are "must reads" in school.

6. Do you think schools are too careful in choosing books due to pressure from those who would censor the curriculum? If so, which sorts of books do you feel are unjustly censored?


I think schools are under A LOT of pressure from parents to choose "appropriate books". I think teachers should be fairly careful when it comes to books assigned to the whole class or give choices so that a parent can veto a particular book and the student has another choice for the assignment. But I think it's wrong to keep books out of the school library. Mark Twain, Harry Potter, Bridge to Terabithia, Judy Blume...those are just a few censored authors that I think are wrong to keep out.

7. Do you think schools place too much emphasis on particular themes or ideas when choosing their curriculum? If so, which ones?


Yes, I love to read, but I hate reading Shakespeare, and we had to read his stuff all the time in school, I think it's overrated. Also, teachers choose a lot of boring, dry books because of their themes. We want kids to enjoy reading, you encourage this by giving them books to read that they can relate to and get excited about. There are millions of books out there, there's no need to choose a book that kids won't like just because it's a "classic" and supports a certain theme.


8. Are there any authors you would remove from school curricula who are presently well-represented? Why?


I'd cut back on the Shakespeare a bit. I think I had to read his stuff in every grade once I hit junior high.

9. Are there any authors not represented that you would like to see added generally? Why?

10. Is there ONE book (aside from religious works) that you think EVERYONE should read? If so, what book and why?



By the way, I'm finishing my teaching degree, so if you didn't notice I feel pretty strongly about getting kids excited about reading! I want them all to love it like I do! I saw a great quote in a teacher's classroom the other day, I don't know if she made it up or where it came from but it said, "Readers are never bored or lonely." I just really like that!
Reply to message
Censorship, promotion of books and dissemination of ideas. - 05/02/2010 05:15:17 PM 1365 Views
Interesting post - 05/02/2010 06:19:06 PM 872 Views
I agree. One Shakespeare is sufficient. *NM* - 06/02/2010 06:42:51 AM 323 Views
Oh, fun! You mentioned the 语录 by Chairman Mao... - 06/02/2010 06:35:21 PM 780 Views
Tough Subject, censorship - 05/02/2010 07:24:39 PM 902 Views
tough questions - 05/02/2010 08:26:30 PM 845 Views
I never saw the humour in Dilbert... - 06/02/2010 06:28:57 PM 866 Views
I actually ran into this in high school. - 05/02/2010 08:33:10 PM 1018 Views
I found that we covered a lot about American Indian issues in US History. - 06/02/2010 06:23:16 PM 797 Views
we coverd most of those things as well - 06/02/2010 08:08:22 PM 949 Views
Anyone interested in German history in particular and European history in general should read it. - 05/02/2010 08:47:14 PM 976 Views
I think jane austen and the brontes would be good to leave in - 06/02/2010 03:44:10 AM 703 Views
They could read Pride & Prejudice & Zombies instead. *NM* - 06/02/2010 04:03:34 PM 314 Views
They could. It'd be very educational. - 06/02/2010 04:37:23 PM 672 Views
What about... - 18/02/2010 06:57:56 PM 1074 Views
Hmm. - 05/02/2010 09:11:13 PM 852 Views
Love the survey. - 05/02/2010 09:42:29 PM 965 Views
Interesting. Do you really think that Nineteen Eighty-Four is plausible? - 06/02/2010 10:13:56 AM 814 Views
It doesn't have to be plausible as a whole to be relevant. - 06/02/2010 08:28:20 PM 813 Views
I agree entirely - 06/02/2010 10:32:07 PM 888 Views
You raise an interesting point. - 06/02/2010 06:06:20 PM 799 Views
Re: Censorship, promotion of books and dissemination of ideas. - 05/02/2010 11:09:41 PM 937 Views
Nietzsche as mandatory reading - that's a fun idea. - 06/02/2010 06:00:29 PM 885 Views
Re: Nietzsche as mandatory reading - that's a fun idea. - 06/02/2010 06:03:59 PM 861 Views
Re: Censorship, promotion of books and dissemination of ideas. - 05/02/2010 11:47:08 PM 929 Views
Re: Censorship, promotion of books and dissemination of ideas. - 06/02/2010 12:11:06 AM 803 Views
I agree with most of that. But to quote our eminent Camilla... - 06/02/2010 10:30:15 AM 909 Views
I agree on the Shakespeare (and mentioned that below). - 06/02/2010 05:54:50 PM 807 Views
Re: I agree on the Shakespeare (and mentioned that below). - 06/02/2010 06:05:48 PM 915 Views
I don't think high school students need to discuss possibilities for staging. - 07/02/2010 01:36:03 AM 758 Views
I think there is value to discussing staging - 07/02/2010 01:52:47 AM 762 Views
nice post - 06/02/2010 01:27:23 AM 782 Views
Re: nice post - 06/02/2010 01:29:34 AM 795 Views
A lot of people think von Clausewitz is important. - 06/02/2010 05:51:44 PM 718 Views
More than Sun Tzu? *NM* - 06/02/2010 08:31:44 PM 300 Views
Sun Zi was relatively unknown in the West until recently. - 07/02/2010 01:30:06 AM 774 Views
Sure, but he could still have influenced world history by influencing Asia... *NM* - 07/02/2010 01:35:17 AM 327 Views
Doubtful. - 07/02/2010 01:41:01 AM 784 Views
Tom, you did not just write that - 07/02/2010 10:12:40 AM 822 Views
The Mongols are not East Asian. They are Central Asian. - 07/02/2010 03:06:19 PM 804 Views
Neat. - 06/02/2010 06:41:37 AM 1043 Views
Brave New World is an excellent choice. - 06/02/2010 05:15:15 PM 732 Views
Re: Censorship, promotion of books and dissemination of ideas. - 06/02/2010 01:44:07 PM 902 Views
I agree that Shakespeare is over-emphasised. - 06/02/2010 04:29:16 PM 672 Views
Before responding to others, I'll post my own responses - 06/02/2010 04:26:53 PM 933 Views
Re: Before responding to others, I'll post my own responses - 06/02/2010 10:34:10 PM 752 Views
Hmm. - 06/02/2010 11:33:02 PM 815 Views
New Zealand has culture? - 07/02/2010 03:25:28 PM 975 Views
Which book of his would you recommend ? - 09/02/2010 04:20:15 PM 764 Views
The Whale Rider is lovely. - 10/02/2010 02:36:01 PM 676 Views
Re: Censorship, promotion of books and dissemination of ideas. - 07/02/2010 11:52:02 PM 843 Views
Re: Censorship, promotion of books and dissemination of ideas. - 08/02/2010 03:14:24 AM 1027 Views
Re: Censorship, promotion of books and dissemination of ideas. - 11/02/2010 10:58:23 PM 908 Views

Reply to Message