Active Users:1136 Time:23/11/2024 03:09:56 AM
Tough Subject, censorship LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 05/02/2010 07:24:39 PM
1. Are there any books that should ever be censored? If so, why? If so, which ones? Who should decide what books are censored and for whom?


I don't necessarily think books should be censored or prevented from production (legally, shouldn't force the companies to print anything they don't want to). But I think that some books should not be readily available, for various reasons.

2. Should any books be withheld from libraries in high schools? If so, why? If so, which ones? Who should decide what books are withheld?


Yes. There are plenty of public libraries for kids to get anything . While I appreciate the fact that many kids don't even have those opportunities, the purpose of school is to learn and to enrich the mind. I'm not saying that a high school should not carry pleasure reading novels, but they should not be the focus of the library. But books that have little purpose except for political impact, or books that have been shown to create discord should be at least limited. For example, if a high school did stock a couple copies of Mein Kampf and incidents kept arising at the school and students claimed the book was the inspiration to their behavior. I would see that as reason to stop stocking that book. I am not saying that students should not read such material. I'm just saying that if the school sees a book creating problems that detract from learning, it is justification to stop stocking it.

3. Name five books (aside from religious works) that you think have had a massive impact on the world, and at least one that is frequently overlooked on lists of that sort.


I really couldn't answer this will, I think. So I'm going to pass.

4. Do you think any of the books you listed in point 3 should be read in schools as mandatory reading? Why or why not?


I think that making specific books required limits a program and closes the minds of the students. If the school wants students to read a certain type of book (ex. Victorian Classical Literature), give them a list of books that would satisfy that requirement. Let the students pick books to suit their preferences, or even better, give them the space to pick and choose and discover books that might be outside the usual selection.

5. Name five books (aside from religious works) that you think SHOULD be mandatory reading in schools (or at least "on the curriculum" if you don't like the word "mandatory"), and why.


Oh jeez, I really couldn't even begin to decide. I really think that there's no reason why a specific book HAS to be read for general knowledge. You can get go through life just fine without reading The Great Gatsby or Animal Farm or Jane Eyre or pretty much any book. As I've said before, I think that allowing the greatest opportunity for exposure is far more important than learning big-name classics.

That being said, I think everyone should have to read Toni Morrison's Beloved . Why? Because it's freakin' weirdness that I demand inflicting on other people.

6. Do you think schools are too careful in choosing books due to pressure from those who would censor the curriculum? If so, which sorts of books do you feel are unjustly censored?


I think it depends on the school. I know you're asking for a generalization, but I think there's just way too much variation between schools throughout the country. Our school was pretty lax on what was allowed to be read, but our demographics allowed for that. I think that censoring a good quality book just because a few parents get all up in their butts about it is a crime. On the other hand, there is plenty to be read in this world and plenty of opportunity in this country to do so. Schools and specific faculty members can be pretty vulnerable to the whims of parents if the school board caters to them. If it was censor a book or have funding cut or some other detriment, I can understand why the school would choose to simply censor the book. I really think nothing should be censored that is age appropriate and of worth. If a book is controversial, but still has depth and "worth", then I don't think the controversy is an excuse. On the other hand, if a book's only value is the controversy, then it's only place is in a study of such material.

7. Do you think schools place too much emphasis on particular themes or ideas when choosing their curriculum? If so, which ones?


I think it would be good for everyone if schools loosened up this dead-set focus on conventional classical literature. Even when a particular teacher gives a student an open-ended assignment, they tend to be limiting. As I've mentioned before, I had to wrestle with my teacher to let me analyze aspects of 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, and she was always pretty flexible with us. But just meaning can be found from most books and to deny an unconventional or less serious piece of literature without trial is a travesty.

8. Are there any authors you would remove from school curricula who are presently well-represented? Why?


The Brontes. They make my mind burn. Austen can stay. Austen is worthy of a guilty-pleasure reading. The Brontes make me twitch.

9. Are there any authors not represented that you would like to see added generally? Why?


Not that I can think of off the top of my head. I'm in Neuro and my brain isn't really on the "author list" part of the brain :P

10. Is there ONE book (aside from religious works) that you think EVERYONE should read? If so, what book and why?


Dr. Seuss. I know. I know. Random. But really. I'm not changing my answer.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
Censorship, promotion of books and dissemination of ideas. - 05/02/2010 05:15:17 PM 1365 Views
Interesting post - 05/02/2010 06:19:06 PM 872 Views
I agree. One Shakespeare is sufficient. *NM* - 06/02/2010 06:42:51 AM 323 Views
Oh, fun! You mentioned the 语录 by Chairman Mao... - 06/02/2010 06:35:21 PM 780 Views
Tough Subject, censorship - 05/02/2010 07:24:39 PM 903 Views
tough questions - 05/02/2010 08:26:30 PM 845 Views
I never saw the humour in Dilbert... - 06/02/2010 06:28:57 PM 866 Views
I actually ran into this in high school. - 05/02/2010 08:33:10 PM 1018 Views
I found that we covered a lot about American Indian issues in US History. - 06/02/2010 06:23:16 PM 797 Views
we coverd most of those things as well - 06/02/2010 08:08:22 PM 949 Views
Anyone interested in German history in particular and European history in general should read it. - 05/02/2010 08:47:14 PM 976 Views
I think jane austen and the brontes would be good to leave in - 06/02/2010 03:44:10 AM 703 Views
They could read Pride & Prejudice & Zombies instead. *NM* - 06/02/2010 04:03:34 PM 315 Views
They could. It'd be very educational. - 06/02/2010 04:37:23 PM 672 Views
What about... - 18/02/2010 06:57:56 PM 1074 Views
Hmm. - 05/02/2010 09:11:13 PM 852 Views
Love the survey. - 05/02/2010 09:42:29 PM 965 Views
Interesting. Do you really think that Nineteen Eighty-Four is plausible? - 06/02/2010 10:13:56 AM 814 Views
It doesn't have to be plausible as a whole to be relevant. - 06/02/2010 08:28:20 PM 813 Views
I agree entirely - 06/02/2010 10:32:07 PM 888 Views
You raise an interesting point. - 06/02/2010 06:06:20 PM 799 Views
Re: Censorship, promotion of books and dissemination of ideas. - 05/02/2010 11:09:41 PM 937 Views
Nietzsche as mandatory reading - that's a fun idea. - 06/02/2010 06:00:29 PM 886 Views
Re: Nietzsche as mandatory reading - that's a fun idea. - 06/02/2010 06:03:59 PM 861 Views
Re: Censorship, promotion of books and dissemination of ideas. - 05/02/2010 11:47:08 PM 929 Views
Re: Censorship, promotion of books and dissemination of ideas. - 06/02/2010 12:11:06 AM 804 Views
I agree with most of that. But to quote our eminent Camilla... - 06/02/2010 10:30:15 AM 910 Views
I agree on the Shakespeare (and mentioned that below). - 06/02/2010 05:54:50 PM 807 Views
Re: I agree on the Shakespeare (and mentioned that below). - 06/02/2010 06:05:48 PM 915 Views
I don't think high school students need to discuss possibilities for staging. - 07/02/2010 01:36:03 AM 758 Views
I think there is value to discussing staging - 07/02/2010 01:52:47 AM 762 Views
nice post - 06/02/2010 01:27:23 AM 782 Views
Re: nice post - 06/02/2010 01:29:34 AM 795 Views
A lot of people think von Clausewitz is important. - 06/02/2010 05:51:44 PM 718 Views
More than Sun Tzu? *NM* - 06/02/2010 08:31:44 PM 300 Views
Sun Zi was relatively unknown in the West until recently. - 07/02/2010 01:30:06 AM 774 Views
Sure, but he could still have influenced world history by influencing Asia... *NM* - 07/02/2010 01:35:17 AM 327 Views
Doubtful. - 07/02/2010 01:41:01 AM 784 Views
Tom, you did not just write that - 07/02/2010 10:12:40 AM 822 Views
The Mongols are not East Asian. They are Central Asian. - 07/02/2010 03:06:19 PM 804 Views
Neat. - 06/02/2010 06:41:37 AM 1043 Views
Brave New World is an excellent choice. - 06/02/2010 05:15:15 PM 732 Views
Re: Censorship, promotion of books and dissemination of ideas. - 06/02/2010 01:44:07 PM 903 Views
I agree that Shakespeare is over-emphasised. - 06/02/2010 04:29:16 PM 672 Views
Before responding to others, I'll post my own responses - 06/02/2010 04:26:53 PM 933 Views
Re: Before responding to others, I'll post my own responses - 06/02/2010 10:34:10 PM 752 Views
Hmm. - 06/02/2010 11:33:02 PM 815 Views
New Zealand has culture? - 07/02/2010 03:25:28 PM 975 Views
Which book of his would you recommend ? - 09/02/2010 04:20:15 PM 764 Views
The Whale Rider is lovely. - 10/02/2010 02:36:01 PM 676 Views
Re: Censorship, promotion of books and dissemination of ideas. - 07/02/2010 11:52:02 PM 843 Views
Re: Censorship, promotion of books and dissemination of ideas. - 08/02/2010 03:14:24 AM 1028 Views
Re: Censorship, promotion of books and dissemination of ideas. - 11/02/2010 10:58:23 PM 908 Views

Reply to Message