Active Users:1141 Time:23/11/2024 04:04:53 AM
Okay, I'm cool with that. Tom Send a noteboard - 27/01/2010 05:44:54 PM
I realise that I can be aggressive at times in my opinions. It's part of who I am. I think that anyone who has met me in real life (as you have) will agree that I am the same online as in real life, but that in real life it is evident that I'm not trying to cajole or browbeat people when I am forceful in my opinions. I recognise, though, that it doesn't always come through properly in the internet setting.

I do appreciate (very much so, and on a regular basis) that this site is more lenient. I think that is a great improvement over wotmania and one of the reasons I really enjoy spending time here.

I see your points and I accept them. There are no hard feelings on my end and I certainly hope there won't be on yours.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas - Book Club now open! - 25/01/2010 10:54:37 PM 2444 Views
Le plot. - 25/01/2010 10:55:26 PM 1208 Views
Plot: demarcation, plan, complot... - 26/01/2010 11:48:19 PM 1339 Views
Les characters. - 25/01/2010 10:56:23 PM 1297 Views
The good, the bad and the ugly. - 26/01/2010 10:54:38 AM 1316 Views
Hmm. - 27/01/2010 03:58:31 PM 1235 Views
Re: Hmm. - 27/01/2010 04:59:12 PM 1303 Views
Re: Hmm. - 28/01/2010 01:40:34 PM 1247 Views
Re: Hmm. - 01/02/2010 12:49:06 PM 1455 Views
Why does the book have enduring appeal? - 25/01/2010 10:57:37 PM 1282 Views
Or rather, does this book share any traits in common with pornography? - 25/01/2010 11:14:01 PM 1408 Views
I think the revenge plot is actually fairly weak. - 26/01/2010 03:43:04 AM 1316 Views
Re: I think the revenge plot is actually fairly weak. - 26/01/2010 11:12:19 AM 1365 Views
In that case, the "release" is quite unsatisfying. - 27/01/2010 01:42:28 PM 1474 Views
Which is precisely part of what makes the book interesting - 27/01/2010 02:06:58 PM 1361 Views
Oh, and your point on revenge - that's just reading too much into the text. - 27/01/2010 02:16:05 PM 1194 Views
There is no such thing - 27/01/2010 02:18:46 PM 1248 Views
I fundamentally disagree with your post-modern take on the novel. - 27/01/2010 02:25:25 PM 1300 Views
It isn't a postmodern take on it - 27/01/2010 02:41:32 PM 1268 Views
Re: Which is precisely part of what makes the book interesting - 27/01/2010 03:40:36 PM 1242 Views
Maybe it's of the same importance as the Lost Symbol. - 27/01/2010 03:44:55 PM 1307 Views
If I ddin't know better, I might think you a trifle petulant - 27/01/2010 04:19:57 PM 1366 Views
I'm never petulant - 27/01/2010 04:55:56 PM 1239 Views
Re: Which is precisely part of what makes the book interesting - 27/01/2010 04:47:37 PM 1337 Views
I think one important question to ask is... - 26/01/2010 12:00:17 AM 1351 Views
I have read the abridged version a couple of times. I am reading the unabridged version this time. - 26/01/2010 03:25:50 AM 1292 Views
the potentially removable part... - 26/01/2010 11:24:16 AM 1356 Views
I have read both - 27/01/2010 01:37:00 AM 1372 Views
The abridged versus the unabridged - 28/01/2010 06:32:22 AM 1287 Views
Re: Why does the book have enduring appeal? - 27/01/2010 01:16:47 AM 1412 Views
Re: Why does the book have enduring appeal? - 30/01/2010 09:12:22 AM 1299 Views
Re: I got here too late, so I offer Umberto Eco's thoughts on the matter: - 22/02/2010 06:59:13 PM 1474 Views
I'm watching right back, Big Brother. *NM* - 25/01/2010 11:44:30 PM 660 Views
*NM* - 25/01/2010 11:45:27 PM 645 Views
The book was very childish. - 26/01/2010 03:05:01 AM 1411 Views
Granted, The Master and Margarita is also very much a fantasy book. *NM* - 26/01/2010 03:07:45 AM 679 Views
No, it really isn't. - 26/01/2010 03:10:08 AM 1360 Views
You know, this is a problem. - 26/01/2010 03:43:14 AM 1331 Views
There's really nothing I can say to this that Greg didn't just say above. - 26/01/2010 06:32:02 AM 1399 Views
People tend to forget one thing about Tolkien - 26/01/2010 01:36:06 PM 1327 Views
Re: No, it really isn't. - 26/01/2010 10:57:19 AM 1263 Views
I'll admit the only Lem I've read is Solaris... - 26/01/2010 01:52:02 PM 1349 Views
Read His Master's Voice - 26/01/2010 04:52:31 PM 1264 Views
You make some rather odd claims here, Tom - 27/01/2010 12:43:41 AM 1348 Views
You place undue importance on academic degrees. - 27/01/2010 01:19:40 AM 1338 Views
You misread totally what I said, I see... - 27/01/2010 01:52:59 AM 1265 Views
My claims are far from odd. In fact, they're quite common. - 27/01/2010 01:57:41 AM 1319 Views
In some circles; in others, they're rather antiquated nowadays - 27/01/2010 02:21:03 AM 1253 Views
If you were trying to write literature, wouldn't the label sting for you? - 27/01/2010 01:25:14 PM 1310 Views
I think it's easier to think of stories fitting into genre(s) than to think the same of authors - 27/01/2010 02:40:29 PM 1374 Views
Allow me to clarify: I'm talking about authors' reactions to their books being so labelled. - 27/01/2010 03:08:47 PM 1418 Views
But yet their reactions vary widely - 27/01/2010 11:33:25 PM 1294 Views
My fundamental premise is that genre has the most utility when applied to derivative fiction. - 28/01/2010 09:39:17 PM 1283 Views
And yet that term is mostly used as a non-loaded term that doesn't attempt to ascribe quality levels - 29/01/2010 02:49:20 AM 1194 Views
I like my definition of science fiction better than the one you quoted. - 29/01/2010 05:16:36 AM 1253 Views
I think estrangement is a key element, though - 30/01/2010 11:00:19 PM 1225 Views
I don't think estrangement is a necessary element. - 30/01/2010 11:47:07 PM 1430 Views
I mean it as a literary effect, that of creating a distance between text and reader - 31/01/2010 12:03:34 AM 1231 Views
Even if that's the meaning, I still disagree. - 03/02/2010 12:49:58 AM 1228 Views
Depends on how you view SF, I suppose - 03/02/2010 04:20:56 AM 1105 Views
I thought that was what we were mulling over - 03/02/2010 04:38:35 AM 1225 Views
True - 03/02/2010 05:11:19 AM 1161 Views
Nice tie-in! - 03/02/2010 01:55:33 PM 1213 Views
- 05/02/2010 06:06:23 AM 1298 Views
The approve of this message. - 26/01/2010 03:34:49 AM 1332 Views
I'm not through it quite yet, but I do have a question - 26/01/2010 12:24:14 PM 1238 Views
Wait...you VOTED for this book? - 26/01/2010 01:41:00 PM 1308 Views
I honestly can't remember. - 26/01/2010 01:55:39 PM 1264 Views
Doctor Zhivago is one of the best novels ever written. - 26/01/2010 02:12:35 PM 1275 Views
Right, so now we all know that if we'd just listen to me more often, the world would be better. - 26/01/2010 02:20:56 PM 1280 Views
The problem was that the suggestions were generally not that good. - 26/01/2010 02:32:50 PM 1328 Views
Possession is not "purely a romance novel". - 26/01/2010 02:57:17 PM 1446 Views
Which basically proves my entire point. - 26/01/2010 03:00:20 PM 1320 Views
Which is purely a romance novel? - 26/01/2010 02:59:38 PM 1324 Views
Fair enough, it might be a bit tricky to discuss. *NM* - 26/01/2010 03:04:58 PM 656 Views
In your opinion - 26/01/2010 03:07:12 PM 1327 Views
Exactly why I avoid suggesting modern books - 26/01/2010 03:10:09 PM 1309 Views
You really are ignornant of what A.S. Byatt writes, aren't you? - 27/01/2010 12:51:00 AM 1295 Views
Oh, I fucking hate epistolary novels. Thank you for warning me. - 27/01/2010 02:00:34 AM 1200 Views
Ha! - 27/01/2010 02:22:00 AM 1252 Views
Perhaps I would like it. I still hate epistolary novels. - 27/01/2010 01:26:43 PM 1289 Views
Indeed. *NM* - 26/01/2010 02:01:22 PM 598 Views
It's funny because I think it's a question of taste level. - 26/01/2010 02:32:08 PM 1386 Views
Curious George is a tale of many layers, as told by Werner Herzog - 26/01/2010 02:34:27 PM 1407 Views
I don't care if this validates your opinion of me. - 29/01/2010 11:06:18 PM 1189 Views
On what basis? - 26/01/2010 02:51:40 PM 1341 Views
It's a children's book. Get over it. Democracy failed. - 26/01/2010 02:55:03 PM 1344 Views
Usually does, when those who know better keep silent. - 26/01/2010 02:57:54 PM 1248 Views
I didn't keep silent, though. - 26/01/2010 04:46:48 PM 1329 Views
You're ignoring what we've been discussing. - 27/01/2010 11:11:44 AM 1295 Views
Regarding comfort zones - 26/01/2010 05:08:50 PM 1366 Views
Camilla, let's be honest here... - 26/01/2010 05:40:08 PM 1354 Views
Re: Camilla, let's be honest here... - 26/01/2010 09:10:47 PM 1347 Views
If that's your goal, Camilla, you failed. - 27/01/2010 01:35:52 PM 1410 Views
Possibly - 27/01/2010 01:38:39 PM 1276 Views
I have not been ranting and raving. I've been highly critical of the book, with much justification. - 27/01/2010 01:45:05 PM 1277 Views
Re: I've been highly critical of the book, with much justification. - 27/01/2010 01:53:28 PM 1266 Views
I was wondering how long it would take for you to blame me and Greg. - 27/01/2010 02:26:12 PM 1399 Views
Don't you get it? We bring this place down. - 27/01/2010 02:42:32 PM 1250 Views
Re: I was wondering how long it would take for you to blame me and Greg. - 27/01/2010 02:43:11 PM 1263 Views
While that was not the intent, that is an added bonus. - 27/01/2010 02:48:47 PM 1258 Views
why is it a bonus? - 27/01/2010 02:52:58 PM 1228 Views
I said see above. You should have before the thought police, Rebekah, started to delete. - 27/01/2010 02:59:07 PM 1511 Views
I did - 27/01/2010 04:40:25 PM 1295 Views
Re: Regarding comfort zones - 27/01/2010 11:57:03 AM 1323 Views
Re: Regarding comfort zones - 27/01/2010 11:59:31 AM 1275 Views
Halfway - 27/01/2010 12:07:14 PM 1271 Views
Re: Halfway - 27/01/2010 12:09:02 PM 1287 Views
Re: The book was very childish. - 30/01/2010 09:56:29 PM 1295 Views
I read it in French - 30/01/2010 10:54:34 PM 1177 Views
So. I really liked it. - 26/01/2010 08:57:02 AM 1392 Views
Yes, fearless leader, this is where I stand. - 26/01/2010 11:04:23 PM 1268 Views
Re: Yes, fearless leader, this is where I stand. - 26/01/2010 11:49:03 PM 1307 Views
We were talking about this last night. - 27/01/2010 11:14:21 AM 1391 Views
Re: We were talking about this last night. - 27/01/2010 11:37:04 AM 1391 Views
If you do that, I'm posting on the deeper meaning of Dan Brown. - 27/01/2010 01:46:35 PM 1366 Views
Feel free to. - 27/01/2010 01:51:23 PM 1337 Views
Your post-modern take on the novel is shit, shit, shit. - 27/01/2010 02:28:56 PM 1300 Views
Re: Your post-modern take on the novel is shit, shit, shit. - 27/01/2010 02:45:41 PM 1323 Views
I'm not setting up a straw man. I'm challenging your touchy-feely approach. - 27/01/2010 03:15:00 PM 1206 Views
My touchy-feely approach? - 27/01/2010 05:09:04 PM 1226 Views
Yes...using passing references in the text to justify a deeper analysis. - 27/01/2010 05:16:10 PM 1279 Views
Doesn't touchy-feely mean that it is steeped in or based on emotion? - 27/01/2010 06:40:31 PM 1248 Views
I think between the two of you I agree more with Tom here. - 27/01/2010 07:01:08 PM 1254 Views
You summed up my reasons for using "touchy-feely" quite well. - 27/01/2010 07:27:45 PM 1241 Views
Glad to hear it. - 27/01/2010 07:39:20 PM 1130 Views
Re: I think between the two of you I agree more with Tom here. - 27/01/2010 08:29:32 PM 1309 Views
See my reply to Tom for clarification, then. - 27/01/2010 08:57:18 PM 1352 Views
Re: See my reply to Tom for clarification, then. - 27/01/2010 09:09:47 PM 1269 Views
Well, so what will it be? - 27/01/2010 09:14:53 PM 1225 Views
Er. Whose position are you arguing - mine or yours? - 27/01/2010 10:33:01 PM 1152 Views
Do it. I'd read that. - 27/01/2010 01:55:23 PM 1390 Views
Re: Do it. I'd read that. - 27/01/2010 02:10:04 PM 1289 Views
Right then. - 27/01/2010 02:15:04 PM 1259 Views
All righty, that's enough of that. For Tom, Greg, and... no, pretty much just you two. - 27/01/2010 04:33:00 PM 1321 Views
And ANOTHER THING - 27/01/2010 05:05:17 PM 1189 Views
Not everyone has finished reading it yet *NM* - 27/01/2010 05:12:10 PM 704 Views
Okay, so you'll get one or two stragglers in a week to a month. It changes nothing. - 27/01/2010 05:17:51 PM 1338 Views
Re: Okay, so you'll get one or two stragglers in a week to a month. It changes nothing. - 27/01/2010 06:41:11 PM 1297 Views
We are discussing this book. We're discussing its faults. - 27/01/2010 07:30:49 PM 1220 Views
In the interest of discussing Dumas' intentions... - 27/01/2010 08:03:24 PM 1391 Views
It was mildly interesting. - 27/01/2010 09:04:03 PM 1344 Views
I think you're misreading that... - 27/01/2010 10:18:11 PM 1360 Views
Re: We are discussing this book. We're discussing its faults. - 27/01/2010 08:30:19 PM 1361 Views
The text doesn't warrant "close attention" any more than Dan Brown's works do. - 27/01/2010 09:10:45 PM 1227 Views
fine. *NM* - 27/01/2010 09:12:44 PM 641 Views
Also, do you think a good book would have generated this level of discussion? Of course not. - 27/01/2010 05:21:45 PM 1265 Views
What discussion? - 27/01/2010 06:42:32 PM 1293 Views
I said that we couldn't discuss the book on its own terms. - 27/01/2010 07:35:32 PM 1377 Views
Which I still think we can. - 27/01/2010 08:35:35 PM 1257 Views
Perhaps you shouldn't be breaking things down at all. - 27/01/2010 09:06:59 PM 1366 Views
Re: Perhaps you shouldn't be breaking things down at all. - 27/01/2010 09:12:22 PM 1310 Views
You have yet to show any utility for breaking things down. - 27/01/2010 09:19:29 PM 1376 Views
I haven't tried to show any "utility" for it. - 01/02/2010 01:06:35 PM 1221 Views
I apologize if I'm part of the reason you feel ganged up on. - 27/01/2010 10:40:36 PM 1278 Views
Re: I apologize if I'm part of the reason you feel ganged up on. - 01/02/2010 12:56:03 PM 1198 Views
Deary me. - 27/01/2010 05:19:58 PM 1468 Views
By "respect" do you mean that you want me to drop my debates? - 27/01/2010 05:24:03 PM 1222 Views
Not at all. - 27/01/2010 05:35:34 PM 1404 Views
Okay, I'm cool with that. - 27/01/2010 05:44:54 PM 1374 Views
Thank you. - 27/01/2010 05:48:05 PM 1791 Views
Please ban me, then. - 27/01/2010 06:44:55 PM 1238 Views
Nods - 18/02/2010 05:06:44 PM 1719 Views
Oh man, I love this thread. *NM* - 28/01/2010 01:17:58 AM 628 Views
On the nature of the "Book Club" - 28/01/2010 09:23:23 PM 1138 Views
Any chance of seeing some shorter suggestions? - 28/01/2010 10:20:59 PM 1361 Views
Yes, shorter would be good. - 28/01/2010 10:23:28 PM 1213 Views
Oh i'm not complaining - 28/01/2010 10:33:48 PM 1216 Views
Sure sounded like it. - 28/01/2010 10:38:27 PM 1277 Views
No for reals, shorter is good. - 29/01/2010 01:08:26 AM 1252 Views
Absolutely. - 29/01/2010 03:33:15 AM 1189 Views
Agreed - 29/01/2010 11:26:34 AM 1281 Views
Well, you should have known better! - 29/01/2010 01:29:40 AM 1254 Views
I do. - 29/01/2010 08:31:30 PM 1239 Views
Thought you did - 29/01/2010 08:38:39 PM 1222 Views
- 29/01/2010 08:51:42 PM 1260 Views
All I can say is The Master and Margarita better be one by March. WE WAS ROBBED. *NM* - 29/01/2010 02:31:48 AM 609 Views
That is the other one that I am considering. *NM* - 29/01/2010 03:32:02 AM 625 Views
I'll re-read Zhivago or Master if either is chosen - 29/01/2010 05:26:02 AM 1210 Views
Talk to me Ghavrel. - 30/01/2010 12:09:24 AM 1160 Views
Well, I haven't finished it yet. - 30/01/2010 02:21:08 AM 1218 Views
Re: On the nature of the "Book Club" - 29/01/2010 12:33:03 PM 1213 Views
I didn't read it for the Book Club - 29/01/2010 12:40:22 AM 1225 Views
Well I'm late to the party - 29/01/2010 06:21:18 AM 1193 Views
No, you're early - 01/02/2010 01:26:10 PM 1096 Views
I still have yet to see that discussion, Camilla. *NM* - 03/02/2010 12:46:24 AM 668 Views
A few comments - 04/02/2010 06:39:18 AM 1540 Views
If I kept you from participating, that's your fault. - 04/02/2010 01:01:46 PM 1179 Views
An interesting quote from the book - does it jibe with your experience? - 29/01/2010 11:23:54 PM 1268 Views
Sure. - 01/02/2010 03:23:59 PM 1231 Views

Reply to Message