I said see above. You should have before the thought police, Rebekah, started to delete.
The Shrike Send a noteboard - 27/01/2010 02:59:07 PM
My disparaging of the choice was in nossy's words, "potentially damaging to the continuation of the club". I think her view is worse. Actually I think Rebekah's pathetic interpretation and deletion may even be worse than that. These people have braces on their brains.
This message last edited by The Shrike on 27/01/2010 at 03:12:09 PM
The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas - Book Club now open!
25/01/2010 10:54:37 PM
- 2444 Views
Les characters.
25/01/2010 10:56:23 PM
- 1297 Views
Why does the book have enduring appeal?
25/01/2010 10:57:37 PM
- 1282 Views
Or rather, does this book share any traits in common with pornography?
25/01/2010 11:14:01 PM
- 1408 Views
I think the revenge plot is actually fairly weak.
26/01/2010 03:43:04 AM
- 1316 Views
Re: I think the revenge plot is actually fairly weak.
26/01/2010 11:12:19 AM
- 1365 Views
In that case, the "release" is quite unsatisfying.
27/01/2010 01:42:28 PM
- 1474 Views
Which is precisely part of what makes the book interesting
27/01/2010 02:06:58 PM
- 1361 Views
He would not have known the book would be ruined by water. He thought he was being buried.
27/01/2010 02:15:02 PM
- 1263 Views
Oh, and your point on revenge - that's just reading too much into the text.
27/01/2010 02:16:05 PM
- 1194 Views
There is no such thing
27/01/2010 02:18:46 PM
- 1248 Views
I fundamentally disagree with your post-modern take on the novel.
27/01/2010 02:25:25 PM
- 1300 Views
Re: Which is precisely part of what makes the book interesting
27/01/2010 03:40:36 PM
- 1242 Views
Maybe it's of the same importance as the Lost Symbol.
27/01/2010 03:44:55 PM
- 1306 Views
I think one important question to ask is...
26/01/2010 12:00:17 AM
- 1351 Views
I like it, but it is purely on the adventure story level, and I've read the unabridged version.
26/01/2010 12:03:01 AM
- 1201 Views
I'm fairly certain I read the unabridged version. It was 1500 pages. *NM*
26/01/2010 02:36:10 AM
- 682 Views
I have read the abridged version a couple of times. I am reading the unabridged version this time.
26/01/2010 03:25:50 AM
- 1292 Views
I have read both
27/01/2010 01:37:00 AM
- 1372 Views
I actually didn't mean the people here on the site so much as readers in general.
27/01/2010 01:44:46 AM
- 1355 Views
Re: I actually didn't mean the people here on the site so much as readers in general.
27/01/2010 01:48:11 AM
- 1294 Views
Re: I got here too late, so I offer Umberto Eco's thoughts on the matter:
22/02/2010 06:59:13 PM
- 1474 Views
The book was very childish.
26/01/2010 03:05:01 AM
- 1411 Views
Granted, The Master and Margarita is also very much a fantasy book. *NM*
26/01/2010 03:07:45 AM
- 679 Views
No, it really isn't.
26/01/2010 03:10:08 AM
- 1360 Views
You know, this is a problem.
26/01/2010 03:43:14 AM
- 1331 Views
Thank God, I've never even heard of "Skol". Popov, yes, but Skol?
26/01/2010 03:49:08 AM
- 1336 Views
I've not tried it, but every time I go into liquor stores, it sits on the bottom shelf.
26/01/2010 03:57:03 AM
- 1234 Views
There's really nothing I can say to this that Greg didn't just say above.
26/01/2010 06:32:02 AM
- 1398 Views
Re: No, it really isn't.
26/01/2010 10:57:19 AM
- 1263 Views
Having Camilla concur with me on literary matters is very encouraging.
26/01/2010 01:37:23 PM
- 1333 Views
I do not agree with your complete dismissal of The Count of Monte Cristo, though
26/01/2010 04:58:58 PM
- 1286 Views
You make some rather odd claims here, Tom
27/01/2010 12:43:41 AM
- 1348 Views
My claims are far from odd. In fact, they're quite common.
27/01/2010 01:57:41 AM
- 1319 Views
In some circles; in others, they're rather antiquated nowadays
27/01/2010 02:21:03 AM
- 1253 Views
If you were trying to write literature, wouldn't the label sting for you?
27/01/2010 01:25:14 PM
- 1310 Views
I think it's easier to think of stories fitting into genre(s) than to think the same of authors
27/01/2010 02:40:29 PM
- 1374 Views
Allow me to clarify: I'm talking about authors' reactions to their books being so labelled.
27/01/2010 03:08:47 PM
- 1418 Views
But yet their reactions vary widely
27/01/2010 11:33:25 PM
- 1294 Views
My fundamental premise is that genre has the most utility when applied to derivative fiction.
28/01/2010 09:39:17 PM
- 1283 Views
And yet that term is mostly used as a non-loaded term that doesn't attempt to ascribe quality levels
29/01/2010 02:49:20 AM
- 1194 Views
I like my definition of science fiction better than the one you quoted.
29/01/2010 05:16:36 AM
- 1253 Views
I think estrangement is a key element, though
30/01/2010 11:00:19 PM
- 1225 Views
I don't think estrangement is a necessary element.
30/01/2010 11:47:07 PM
- 1430 Views
I mean it as a literary effect, that of creating a distance between text and reader
31/01/2010 12:03:34 AM
- 1231 Views
Even if that's the meaning, I still disagree.
03/02/2010 12:49:58 AM
- 1228 Views
Depends on how you view SF, I suppose
03/02/2010 04:20:56 AM
- 1105 Views
I thought that was what we were mulling over
03/02/2010 04:38:35 AM
- 1225 Views
Your unscientific anecdotal evidence sounds very odd to me.
28/01/2010 12:15:10 AM
- 1299 Views
It might. I'm not purporting to speak for all of humanity (at least on this point).
28/01/2010 09:43:40 PM
- 1348 Views
So, what you're saying is that watching the 2002 movie was sufficient? Good! *NM*
26/01/2010 06:34:53 AM
- 642 Views
I'm not through it quite yet, but I do have a question
26/01/2010 12:24:14 PM
- 1237 Views
Wait...you VOTED for this book?
26/01/2010 01:41:00 PM
- 1308 Views
I honestly can't remember.
26/01/2010 01:55:39 PM
- 1264 Views
Doctor Zhivago is one of the best novels ever written.
26/01/2010 02:12:35 PM
- 1273 Views
Right, so now we all know that if we'd just listen to me more often, the world would be better.
26/01/2010 02:20:56 PM
- 1278 Views
The problem was that the suggestions were generally not that good.
26/01/2010 02:32:50 PM
- 1326 Views
You really are ignornant of what A.S. Byatt writes, aren't you?
27/01/2010 12:51:00 AM
- 1295 Views
Oh, I fucking hate epistolary novels. Thank you for warning me.
27/01/2010 02:00:34 AM
- 1200 Views
It's funny because I think it's a question of taste level.
26/01/2010 02:32:08 PM
- 1384 Views
Curious George is a tale of many layers, as told by Werner Herzog
26/01/2010 02:34:27 PM
- 1405 Views
On what basis?
26/01/2010 02:51:40 PM
- 1339 Views
It's a children's book. Get over it. Democracy failed.
26/01/2010 02:55:03 PM
- 1342 Views
Usually does, when those who know better keep silent.
26/01/2010 02:57:54 PM
- 1246 Views
Regarding comfort zones
26/01/2010 05:08:50 PM
- 1363 Views
Camilla, let's be honest here...
26/01/2010 05:40:08 PM
- 1352 Views
Re: Camilla, let's be honest here...
26/01/2010 09:10:47 PM
- 1347 Views
If that's your goal, Camilla, you failed.
27/01/2010 01:35:52 PM
- 1410 Views
Possibly
27/01/2010 01:38:39 PM
- 1276 Views
I have not been ranting and raving. I've been highly critical of the book, with much justification.
27/01/2010 01:45:05 PM
- 1277 Views
Re: I've been highly critical of the book, with much justification.
27/01/2010 01:53:28 PM
- 1265 Views
I was wondering how long it would take for you to blame me and Greg.
27/01/2010 02:26:12 PM
- 1399 Views
Don't you get it? We bring this place down.
27/01/2010 02:42:32 PM
- 1250 Views
Heh heh heh. Pink cardigan-wearing suburban cul-de-sac. I like it. *NM*
27/01/2010 03:11:25 PM
- 643 Views
Re: I was wondering how long it would take for you to blame me and Greg.
27/01/2010 02:43:11 PM
- 1263 Views
While that was not the intent, that is an added bonus.
27/01/2010 02:48:47 PM
- 1258 Views
why is it a bonus?
27/01/2010 02:52:58 PM
- 1228 Views
I said see above. You should have before the thought police, Rebekah, started to delete.
27/01/2010 02:59:07 PM
- 1511 Views
Well, you wouldn't grow tired of us calling a novel shit if you chose a novel that wasn't shit.
27/01/2010 03:11:57 PM
- 1249 Views
Re: Regarding comfort zones
27/01/2010 11:57:03 AM
- 1322 Views
So. I really liked it.
26/01/2010 08:57:02 AM
- 1392 Views
Yes, fearless leader, this is where I stand.
26/01/2010 11:04:23 PM
- 1268 Views
Re: Yes, fearless leader, this is where I stand.
26/01/2010 11:49:03 PM
- 1307 Views
We were talking about this last night.
27/01/2010 11:14:21 AM
- 1390 Views
Re: We were talking about this last night.
27/01/2010 11:37:04 AM
- 1391 Views
If you do that, I'm posting on the deeper meaning of Dan Brown.
27/01/2010 01:46:35 PM
- 1366 Views
Feel free to.
27/01/2010 01:51:23 PM
- 1337 Views
Your post-modern take on the novel is shit, shit, shit.
27/01/2010 02:28:56 PM
- 1300 Views
Re: Your post-modern take on the novel is shit, shit, shit.
27/01/2010 02:45:41 PM
- 1323 Views
I'm not setting up a straw man. I'm challenging your touchy-feely approach.
27/01/2010 03:15:00 PM
- 1206 Views
My touchy-feely approach?
27/01/2010 05:09:04 PM
- 1226 Views
Yes...using passing references in the text to justify a deeper analysis.
27/01/2010 05:16:10 PM
- 1279 Views
Doesn't touchy-feely mean that it is steeped in or based on emotion?
27/01/2010 06:40:31 PM
- 1248 Views
I think between the two of you I agree more with Tom here.
27/01/2010 07:01:08 PM
- 1254 Views
Re: I think between the two of you I agree more with Tom here.
27/01/2010 08:29:32 PM
- 1309 Views
See my reply to Tom for clarification, then.
27/01/2010 08:57:18 PM
- 1352 Views
Re: See my reply to Tom for clarification, then.
27/01/2010 09:09:47 PM
- 1269 Views
Er. Whose position are you arguing - mine or yours?
27/01/2010 10:33:01 PM
- 1152 Views
Mine. Which is more complicated than a simple rejection. That is what I am saying.
01/02/2010 12:53:58 PM
- 1129 Views
Do it. I'd read that.
27/01/2010 01:55:23 PM
- 1390 Views
All righty, that's enough of that. For Tom, Greg, and... no, pretty much just you two.
27/01/2010 04:33:00 PM
- 1321 Views
I call bullshit. I have been conducting the debate in a measured fashion.
27/01/2010 04:50:35 PM
- 1276 Views
And ANOTHER THING
27/01/2010 05:05:17 PM
- 1188 Views
Not everyone has finished reading it yet *NM*
27/01/2010 05:12:10 PM
- 704 Views
Okay, so you'll get one or two stragglers in a week to a month. It changes nothing.
27/01/2010 05:17:51 PM
- 1338 Views
Re: Okay, so you'll get one or two stragglers in a week to a month. It changes nothing.
27/01/2010 06:41:11 PM
- 1297 Views
We are discussing this book. We're discussing its faults.
27/01/2010 07:30:49 PM
- 1219 Views
In the interest of discussing Dumas' intentions...
27/01/2010 08:03:24 PM
- 1391 Views
Re: We are discussing this book. We're discussing its faults.
27/01/2010 08:30:19 PM
- 1361 Views
The text doesn't warrant "close attention" any more than Dan Brown's works do.
27/01/2010 09:10:45 PM
- 1227 Views
Also, do you think a good book would have generated this level of discussion? Of course not.
27/01/2010 05:21:45 PM
- 1264 Views
What discussion?
27/01/2010 06:42:32 PM
- 1293 Views
I said that we couldn't discuss the book on its own terms.
27/01/2010 07:35:32 PM
- 1377 Views
Which I still think we can.
27/01/2010 08:35:35 PM
- 1257 Views
Perhaps you shouldn't be breaking things down at all.
27/01/2010 09:06:59 PM
- 1366 Views
Re: Perhaps you shouldn't be breaking things down at all.
27/01/2010 09:12:22 PM
- 1310 Views
I apologize if I'm part of the reason you feel ganged up on.
27/01/2010 10:40:36 PM
- 1278 Views
Re: I apologize if I'm part of the reason you feel ganged up on.
01/02/2010 12:56:03 PM
- 1197 Views
Deary me.
27/01/2010 05:19:58 PM
- 1468 Views
By "respect" do you mean that you want me to drop my debates?
27/01/2010 05:24:03 PM
- 1222 Views
Not at all.
27/01/2010 05:35:34 PM
- 1404 Views
I'm sorry as well - if I had any kind of willpower, it wouldn't have gotten that far.
27/01/2010 06:29:43 PM
- 1303 Views
On the nature of the "Book Club"
28/01/2010 09:23:23 PM
- 1138 Views
Any chance of seeing some shorter suggestions?
28/01/2010 10:20:59 PM
- 1361 Views
Yes, shorter would be good.
28/01/2010 10:23:28 PM
- 1213 Views
Well, you should have known better!
29/01/2010 01:29:40 AM
- 1254 Views
All I can say is The Master and Margarita better be one by March. WE WAS ROBBED. *NM*
29/01/2010 02:31:48 AM
- 608 Views
Well I'm late to the party
29/01/2010 06:21:18 AM
- 1192 Views
No, you're early
01/02/2010 01:26:10 PM
- 1096 Views
I still have yet to see that discussion, Camilla. *NM*
03/02/2010 12:46:24 AM
- 668 Views
Interesting way of dismissing what has already been discussed about the book
03/02/2010 04:22:26 AM
- 1356 Views
Nah, there's been discussion, here and there inbetween the fighting. *NM*
03/02/2010 04:39:24 PM
- 612 Views
An interesting quote from the book - does it jibe with your experience?
29/01/2010 11:23:54 PM
- 1268 Views