Active Users:1227 Time:23/11/2024 02:40:50 AM
Oh dear. *NM* Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 20/12/2009 09:36:38 PM
In my opinion (based on those two books alone) Sanderson is average at most things, and very poor at two particulars: World building, and dialog. Both books remain focused on one very small area, with only a token mention now and then of the world at large. I've read plenty of other stories centered around small geographical areas, but none of them felt so. . .confining. I think it's because most authors unashamedly stick to their spot, while Sanderson makes a half hearted attempt to flesh out his world, and ends up making things worse.

As to his dialog, it's the worst I've ever read. Flat, boring, and unemotional. It's hard for me to describe the technical points of why it's bad, but. . .ugh. There's no life to it at all. Both books have love stories between main characters, and even THOSE are bad. I'm typically pretty forgiving of bad writing, but I don't care for Sanderson's brand at all.

Then again, I really enjoyed the latest wheel of time book. I can only assume it's because Jordan wrote so many of the scenes, and left a ton of notes + 11 books of examples behind. I'm hoping, though, that it's not that at all, and that Sanderson is simply improving. ;)
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
So, about this Brad Sandysun guy. - 18/12/2009 10:34:10 PM 1026 Views
Mistborn hands down. - 18/12/2009 10:55:05 PM 698 Views
Mistborn. Absolutely. - 18/12/2009 11:47:10 PM 667 Views
I prefer the politics of WoT to most everything else. *NM* - 19/12/2009 01:00:34 AM 271 Views
The politics are good, yes, but - 20/12/2009 04:44:53 AM 612 Views
Elantris was good until the last chapter or so. - 19/12/2009 12:56:47 AM 620 Views
Honestly? Neither. *NM* - 19/12/2009 02:06:16 AM 260 Views
Another book, or is he bad? Your reply is not very helpful. *NM* - 19/12/2009 02:46:50 AM 280 Views
I would call him average. - 19/12/2009 03:30:24 AM 702 Views
The 2nd and 3rd books of Mistborn were better. - 19/12/2009 03:57:39 PM 610 Views
Rather strongly disagree with this. - 21/12/2009 04:41:01 PM 601 Views
Mistborn. *NM* - 19/12/2009 02:28:43 AM 269 Views
You can try Warbreaker. - 19/12/2009 09:56:18 AM 584 Views
Seconded. A good (free) starting point. *NM* - 20/12/2009 02:26:12 PM 258 Views
Personally... - 19/12/2009 10:13:29 AM 633 Views
Elantris was ok but... - 19/12/2009 01:45:10 PM 632 Views
I loved all four of his books. - 19/12/2009 04:00:09 PM 584 Views
Mistborn is a better story, but do you want to read a series or a stand-alone? *NM* - 19/12/2009 05:45:37 PM 270 Views
If that mattered a lot to me, don't you think I'd already have chosen? - 19/12/2009 06:24:25 PM 638 Views
I would never dare presume how you think. *NM* - 20/12/2009 06:08:52 PM 266 Views
Aw, you're sweet. *NM* - 20/12/2009 09:35:45 PM 272 Views
"Neither" is the best recommendation so far, but I enjoyed Elantris more. - 20/12/2009 05:26:15 AM 557 Views
Oh dear. *NM* - 20/12/2009 09:36:38 PM 251 Views
Mistborn...I enjoyed it a lot - 20/12/2009 07:12:32 AM 504 Views
Mistborn - 20/12/2009 08:16:50 AM 599 Views
Warbreaker is better as a standalone. Mistborn if you want a series. - 21/12/2009 10:48:46 PM 677 Views
Ah, but the ending of Well of Ascension was so good. - 22/12/2009 06:29:37 AM 604 Views

Reply to Message