Active Users:1098 Time:22/11/2024 01:14:53 PM
Yes, and the book is bad. Ouranid Send a noteboard - 14/12/2009 06:18:02 PM
And no, I'm not saying it out of outrage. I read the book before I became aware of the ccontroversy, and couldn't really care. But the book is bad, and considering she has so many brilliant books, it baffles me that this is the one consistently mentioned.

The Blind Assassin or The Handmaid's Tale are better choices when it comes to her spec fi.
*MySmiley*
Indeed, I marry them in their unlawful bed, with an open heart I affirm the true right of any man and woman to their dark slobbering nights which are rare enough, and against which too many laws conspire.
Reply to message
20 Best Science Fiction Books of the Decade - 13/12/2009 10:16:32 PM 1249 Views
How can Harry Potter be there and the Dark Tower not ? - 13/12/2009 11:53:10 PM 668 Views
I guess because... - 14/12/2009 12:11:47 AM 700 Views
Oh. Well that sentence was too long! - 14/12/2009 07:48:19 AM 655 Views
I'm kinda meh on Harry Potter but at least I found it interesting enough to finish - 14/12/2009 02:25:36 PM 618 Views
you're just saying that to hurt me *NM* - 14/12/2009 06:14:31 PM 279 Views
Awww. It isn't just to hurt you. - 14/12/2009 08:55:44 PM 625 Views
I'm really struggling to finish Dark Tower.... - 16/12/2009 07:19:35 AM 577 Views
Similar for me - 16/12/2009 12:03:48 PM 662 Views
It's worth finishing. - 16/12/2009 03:02:32 PM 625 Views
I think they put Oryx and Crake on lists like this just to spite Margaret Atwood *NM* - 14/12/2009 12:10:35 AM 435 Views
What do you mean? *NM* - 14/12/2009 01:52:01 PM 269 Views
She's on record as being a bit snobby about Sci-Fi and not wanting to be labelled with it *NM* - 14/12/2009 02:23:46 PM 261 Views
Yes, and the book is bad. - 14/12/2009 06:18:02 PM 650 Views
I liked it - 16/12/2009 01:17:57 PM 671 Views
I agree with her 100%. It's not Science Fiction. *NM* - 15/12/2009 06:47:50 PM 305 Views
She later changed her mind and said it is science fiction. - 15/12/2009 10:09:03 PM 829 Views
Lists are created that we may complain about them. - 14/12/2009 12:31:32 AM 628 Views
Yeah, what he said. *NM* - 14/12/2009 07:27:58 AM 268 Views
Read most of these - 14/12/2009 12:43:05 AM 895 Views
Thank you. - 10/01/2010 01:45:11 AM 835 Views
Double post - 10/01/2010 01:45:27 AM 808 Views
I'm a little surprised The Lies of Locke Lamora isn't on there, to be honest. - 14/12/2009 02:35:13 AM 612 Views
it's fantasy. not sf even by a stretch. *NM* - 14/12/2009 05:52:05 AM 275 Views
and really, not very good. *NM* - 14/12/2009 05:52:39 AM 293 Views
See below. *NM* - 14/12/2009 06:52:39 AM 258 Views
Harry Potter? *NM* - 14/12/2009 06:52:32 AM 289 Views
Re: 20 Best Science Fiction Books of the Decade - 14/12/2009 02:28:29 PM 628 Views
Not sure if I could come up with a ranking. - 14/12/2009 05:28:34 PM 762 Views
I'd say the Scar is more balanced - 14/12/2009 06:18:13 PM 562 Views
Generally agree but... - 14/12/2009 06:22:50 PM 616 Views
Am I th eonly one who always reads Ekaterina Sedia as Ekaterina Sedai? *NM* - 14/12/2009 08:52:57 PM 305 Views
Nope. *NM* - 14/12/2009 11:41:01 PM 275 Views
Yes. Freak. *NM* - 15/12/2009 11:25:40 AM 267 Views
I thought it was a Wotmania username for a while *NM* - 15/12/2009 06:38:16 PM 261 Views
Same. - 16/12/2009 05:35:55 AM 642 Views
Glad to see Ted Chiang make the list - 10/01/2010 01:48:44 AM 803 Views

Reply to Message