As the work puts more and more distance between itself and reality, the risk of becoming simply a "diversion" increases. Certainly, the reader should be on the lookout for deeper messages, but that having been said, it's hard to really expect a deeper message from a lot of authors in the genre.
Jordan certainly provided a diversion and little more. The interesting thing is that Sanderson's novels show a much higher level of insight and thought, and so the series might end a bit "deeper", so to speak, than it would have if Jordan had written it.
To take the analogy of dwarves and racism, while such a story could prove a point, it also distances people from the historical realities of racism in the real world, which robs the issue of much of its complexity. On the one hand, it may make certain ideas about the inherent injustice in racism plain to people who wouldn't have thought about it that way, but on the other hand, many could dismiss it or see it as inapplicable to a real-world situation where they or their friends may be more emotionally involved. Of course, it might be very interesting to read.
The real point of this post is to try to encourage people to go beyond reading simply fantasy and science fiction because an incomparably large portion of it is little more than diversion. If it stirred a healthy debate, all the better. If people start to analyse their reading choices and wonder, "Am I missing something?" then they benefit.
Jordan certainly provided a diversion and little more. The interesting thing is that Sanderson's novels show a much higher level of insight and thought, and so the series might end a bit "deeper", so to speak, than it would have if Jordan had written it.
To take the analogy of dwarves and racism, while such a story could prove a point, it also distances people from the historical realities of racism in the real world, which robs the issue of much of its complexity. On the one hand, it may make certain ideas about the inherent injustice in racism plain to people who wouldn't have thought about it that way, but on the other hand, many could dismiss it or see it as inapplicable to a real-world situation where they or their friends may be more emotionally involved. Of course, it might be very interesting to read.
The real point of this post is to try to encourage people to go beyond reading simply fantasy and science fiction because an incomparably large portion of it is little more than diversion. If it stirred a healthy debate, all the better. If people start to analyse their reading choices and wonder, "Am I missing something?" then they benefit.
Fair enough, and a laudable goal. I personally think there's a lot more to WoT than just diversion though. There's meat on those bones, and not just in terms of making contortionists out of tropes (though that's a fine example since most people don't really think about what those tropes symbolize unless they've spent some time with Campbell.) You can't tell me you read the debates between Rand and the others over whether to torture Semi and don't see something... familiar.... A lot of people won't, just as a lot of people would dismiss the parallels between demihuman and racial bigotry, but, once again, who's fault is that? I'm sure Stalin would be quick to tell you Animal Farm got it all wrong, too, but I doubt you'd be convinced.
The thread will have to wait until I both have a chance to pick out all the more serious things I think Jordan has to say and have finished tonights shift.
In Support of Other Fiction
01/12/2009 09:06:14 PM
- 2050 Views
01/12/2009 09:22:56 PM
- 1118 Views
Re:
01/12/2009 09:28:04 PM
- 1098 Views
you shouldn't feel the need to defend a non SF/F suggestion, just don't
03/12/2009 03:34:28 PM
- 1113 Views
Well, let me offer a diverging view on the topic of speculative fiction.
01/12/2009 09:46:35 PM
- 1021 Views
I would counter that the stripping away removes a level of reality.
01/12/2009 10:05:28 PM
- 1108 Views
That's a Slippery Slope Because You Could Argue On the Same Basis That All Fiction Does That.
01/12/2009 11:34:34 PM
- 1159 Views
I don't see the slippery slope, but rather, a confirmation of my original point.
02/12/2009 01:41:24 AM
- 1100 Views
perhaps some university will do a study
03/12/2009 03:55:54 PM
- 1062 Views
I'd like to see it
03/12/2009 09:15:12 PM
- 1116 Views
I Think I'll Post a Thread on This.
03/12/2009 06:47:05 PM
- 1023 Views
I'd like to see it.
03/12/2009 09:23:07 PM
- 1074 Views
Regarding depth in Jordan
03/12/2009 09:31:19 PM
- 1086 Views
I was thinking about that too
03/12/2009 10:05:40 PM
- 1056 Views
Re: I was thinking about that too
03/12/2009 10:09:26 PM
- 1156 Views
Destroying the Wheel is meaningless.
03/12/2009 10:18:08 PM
- 1046 Views
Re: Destroying the Wheel is meaningless.
03/12/2009 10:30:15 PM
- 1081 Views
It would. Destroying the Wheel would likely make him a Buddhist.
03/12/2009 10:51:17 PM
- 1059 Views
I Totally Missed That.
04/12/2009 10:45:56 PM
- 1131 Views
Re: I Totally Missed That.
04/12/2009 10:47:59 PM
- 1116 Views
I Don't Believe It Cursory, But Comparative.
04/12/2009 11:29:36 PM
- 1200 Views
Re: Well, let me offer a diverging view on the topic of speculative fiction.
02/12/2009 12:28:30 AM
- 1073 Views
I find Michel Houellebecq to be one of the most intriguing writers of our time
01/12/2009 11:14:05 PM
- 1171 Views
wait! there's somebody "dirtier" than Piers Anthony or Philip Jose Farmer???
03/12/2009 04:00:28 PM
- 1124 Views
Nice post.
02/12/2009 12:03:09 AM
- 1172 Views
I guess I'll break my silence after almost a month and a half...
02/12/2009 12:23:07 AM
- 1178 Views
Popcorn?
02/12/2009 12:31:44 AM
- 1104 Views
I'm glad I could drive you from your Carthusian retreat, Larry
02/12/2009 01:58:49 AM
- 1110 Views
It won't last for long - have too many things still to deal with in my life
02/12/2009 02:36:15 AM
- 1096 Views
That's too bad. I'll have to learn monasterial sign language to continue a dialogue.
02/12/2009 03:49:01 AM
- 1059 Views
I concur
02/12/2009 12:27:13 AM
- 1063 Views
I like your framing of the issue (and Shannara is the Taco Bell of writing).
02/12/2009 02:03:51 AM
- 1111 Views
Am i the only one who reads books for fun?
02/12/2009 12:33:52 AM
- 1166 Views
I certainly didn't read The Lost Symbol for ANY cultural, intellectual or edifying reason.
02/12/2009 02:05:45 AM
- 1067 Views
Of course not. Personally, I don't touch anything other than mind candy when I'm in school,
02/12/2009 03:29:23 AM
- 1037 Views
one of the things that is important to me in books/shows
03/12/2009 05:20:29 PM
- 972 Views
WoT has decent characterization, though a little overwrought. Harrington... not so much.
04/12/2009 04:26:43 AM
- 1230 Views
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is a science fiction/fantasy movie.
02/12/2009 12:54:08 AM
- 1131 Views
Reading only speculative literature is limiting and monotonous.
02/12/2009 02:09:42 AM
- 1165 Views
I was going to say exactly that about "real" literature: monotonous and limiting.
02/12/2009 01:57:49 PM
- 1062 Views
I would not disagree with you if you said that.
02/12/2009 02:27:08 PM
- 990 Views
Most non-speculative fiction is fluff as well though.
03/12/2009 05:38:32 PM
- 987 Views
Which brings us back to my point.
03/12/2009 08:04:24 PM
- 1114 Views
I would like to see the study and statistics that produced this answer.
04/12/2009 05:24:02 PM
- 997 Views
Re: I would like to see the study and statistics that produced this answer.
04/12/2009 10:42:33 PM
- 1022 Views
Actually, it is a film that does not fit neatly into one category
02/12/2009 11:16:20 AM
- 1112 Views
Science Fiction is the most PERTINANT form of fiction in the world today
02/12/2009 12:57:19 AM
- 1054 Views
"Pertinent", not "Pertinant". If it weren't in all caps I'd have ignored it this time.
02/12/2009 02:13:36 AM
- 1099 Views
SF&F and 'real literature' are not mutually exclusive
02/12/2009 01:19:05 AM
- 1060 Views
So why don't we occasionally focus on "real" books that are technically spec fiction?
02/12/2009 01:25:04 AM
- 1036 Views
Why must we limit our focus in that way?
02/12/2009 02:20:11 AM
- 1021 Views
I don't see it as limiting or forcing.
02/12/2009 03:16:07 AM
- 1044 Views
"Elite club" or "elitist clique"?
02/12/2009 03:52:11 AM
- 1032 Views
Elite club is how we midwestern rednecks refer to Elitist Clique. *chews on a piece of hay*
02/12/2009 02:52:01 PM
- 1185 Views
I was born in the Midwest.
02/12/2009 03:01:36 PM
- 1097 Views
I know.
02/12/2009 03:12:05 PM
- 1028 Views
...!
02/12/2009 03:17:57 PM
- 1039 Views
Admit it. You know what I'm talking about.
02/12/2009 03:29:31 PM
- 1052 Views
Re: Admit it. You know what I'm talking about.
02/12/2009 03:31:26 PM
- 997 Views
Huh! I really didn't think of you as being a masochist.
02/12/2009 01:51:55 AM
- 1003 Views
Read what you like to read.
02/12/2009 04:18:53 AM
- 1117 Views
I'll super size you. Fine. *NM*
02/12/2009 04:32:58 AM
- 524 Views
Oh noes! I'm getting word-fat!
02/12/2009 04:59:05 AM
- 1042 Views
I seem to have struck a nerve.
02/12/2009 05:20:27 AM
- 1079 Views
Apparently not the nerve you think, though.
02/12/2009 06:42:02 AM
- 1148 Views
Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure.
02/12/2009 02:13:10 PM
- 1062 Views
Re: Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure.
02/12/2009 09:40:28 PM
- 1111 Views
I really did get under your skin
02/12/2009 09:58:18 PM
- 985 Views
Tom as much as you raise some great points, you are being a condescending ass.
03/12/2009 04:26:27 AM
- 1043 Views
You're entitled to your opinion. I don't care.
03/12/2009 04:51:18 AM
- 1019 Views
I keep replying. It's like a sickness.
03/12/2009 05:15:28 AM
- 1043 Views
Hm.
02/12/2009 06:58:56 AM
- 1630 Views
Re-read my exact point.
02/12/2009 02:18:20 PM
- 998 Views
No. Some kind of reading is indeed essential.
02/12/2009 02:28:22 PM
- 1150 Views
There may have been an assumption about literature due to the reason for the post.
02/12/2009 02:37:47 PM
- 1057 Views
Somehow I get the feeling that this post hasn't caused quite as much controversy
02/12/2009 06:53:18 AM
- 1142 Views
As I see it...
02/12/2009 11:38:07 AM
- 1032 Views
Yep.
02/12/2009 02:18:22 PM
- 1186 Views
Re: Yep.
02/12/2009 03:35:38 PM
- 1054 Views
Euripides was poorly received, initially.
02/12/2009 03:57:58 PM
- 957 Views
I wasn't looking to generate controversy
02/12/2009 02:19:13 PM
- 1152 Views
Well... then I'm going to have to agree with Craig a bit.
02/12/2009 02:32:59 PM
- 1138 Views
Well, I was being somewhat denigrating. "Unnecessarily" or not is a matter of debate.
02/12/2009 02:40:29 PM
- 1012 Views
Well, it's only "unnecessary" if you don't want people to be turned off of your message immediately. *NM*
02/12/2009 09:42:46 PM
- 508 Views
Judging from the responses, most people weren't turned off immediately.
02/12/2009 09:59:35 PM
- 1002 Views
All reading of fiction is a diversion by the very nature of the activity.
02/12/2009 03:43:05 PM
- 1053 Views
Diversion from direct action, yes. Diversion from reality, no.
02/12/2009 04:15:48 PM
- 1004 Views
I maintain that all acts of reading fiction are a diversion from reality/ the realistic
02/12/2009 05:43:16 PM
- 1024 Views
It seems a regressive argument to me.
03/12/2009 01:18:02 AM
- 978 Views
You're playing a game.
03/12/2009 03:40:14 PM
- 1055 Views
I fundamentally agree with much of what you're saying, but there is a distinction.
03/12/2009 06:44:02 PM
- 1045 Views
Spec fic is perhaps at it's best in autocracies?
02/12/2009 04:10:56 PM
- 975 Views
Bulgakov
02/12/2009 04:25:17 PM
- 1024 Views
I've only read the first chapter of M&M.
02/12/2009 04:36:09 PM
- 997 Views
Re: I've only read the first chapter of M&M.
02/12/2009 04:40:16 PM
- 951 Views
Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me.
02/12/2009 05:17:31 PM
- 986 Views
Re: Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me.
02/12/2009 05:40:16 PM
- 1026 Views
I suppose.
02/12/2009 06:26:30 PM
- 1036 Views
Re: I suppose.
02/12/2009 07:25:26 PM
- 1043 Views
This was something I was exploring earlier.
02/12/2009 04:34:41 PM
- 1077 Views
Funny thing about the hivemind antagonist.
02/12/2009 05:13:30 PM
- 1040 Views
I didn't see the zombies reading speculative fiction
02/12/2009 05:30:26 PM
- 1122 Views
Oh, they prefer Clive Cussler.
02/12/2009 06:23:42 PM
- 1092 Views
There's an interesting book in Russian that might be translated somewhere.
02/12/2009 10:02:48 PM
- 1092 Views
i think it comes more down to quality than genre.
02/12/2009 04:55:20 PM
- 1054 Views
I disagree with the ultimate conclusion but agree with many of your points.
02/12/2009 05:43:04 PM
- 1030 Views
the illiad is a classic
02/12/2009 06:35:24 PM
- 1052 Views
There's only one "L" in Iliad
02/12/2009 08:18:38 PM
- 1019 Views
It took me a few minutes to agree
02/12/2009 07:04:59 PM
- 1003 Views
Well, I'm glad if you got something out of the post!
02/12/2009 09:13:26 PM
- 1022 Views
Many people have mentioned that there's quite a bit of good sff lit out there and you seem to agree.
02/12/2009 07:33:42 PM
- 1131 Views
The website is called "Read and Find Out". It doesn't specify what we're supposed to read.
02/12/2009 08:42:19 PM
- 1094 Views
Anti the idea ? I see no evidence for this.
02/12/2009 09:50:37 PM
- 1048 Views
Heh
02/12/2009 09:56:30 PM
- 1054 Views
I have a few objections.
03/12/2009 12:24:43 AM
- 1068 Views
where else should we talk about it?
03/12/2009 12:37:26 AM
- 1026 Views
There's a difference between having threads about it and focusing the official book club on it.
03/12/2009 12:40:53 AM
- 1118 Views
This is the Sci-Fi and Fantasy Board for site optimization purposes.
03/12/2009 01:07:39 AM
- 14057 Views
random thoughts stole my subject line
03/12/2009 01:56:07 AM
- 1066 Views
I think I could agree with a "comfort food" analogy
03/12/2009 02:12:01 AM
- 1077 Views
That's it
03/12/2009 04:02:28 AM
- 1138 Views
Question: is it really science fiction without one of the following:
03/12/2009 05:13:21 AM
- 1069 Views
technically speaking, fantasy is classed as a sub heading under science fiction. *NM*
03/12/2009 02:51:12 PM
- 437 Views
Yes, it is but actually...
03/12/2009 09:31:44 PM
- 1056 Views
But Dan Brown rocks da house!!! *NM*
03/12/2009 02:16:47 AM
- 535 Views
another thing wrong with your argument
03/12/2009 03:30:19 PM
- 1033 Views
Absolutely not. And, as I said before, there's only one "L" in Iliad.
03/12/2009 06:53:35 PM
- 859 Views
sorry about my atrocious spelling (including the one on pertinent)
03/12/2009 07:14:59 PM
- 1156 Views
is it just me, or is this now the largest post/thread yet on RAFO.com??? 168 replies so far! *NM*
03/12/2009 05:03:25 PM
- 467 Views
Congratulations on the replies count
03/12/2009 09:30:41 PM
- 1153 Views
That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
03/12/2009 10:50:29 PM
- 1102 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
04/12/2009 07:44:56 PM
- 1079 Views
But the objective truth of a setting can be measured.
04/12/2009 10:37:10 PM
- 1015 Views
But does it make any difference in the objective value of the book?
06/12/2009 09:35:59 AM
- 1175 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
04/12/2009 10:25:08 PM
- 1024 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
06/12/2009 09:36:11 AM
- 1025 Views
I've obviously missed the show here...
04/12/2009 12:14:30 AM
- 988 Views
I'm not sure that's right. This thing just keeps growing.
04/12/2009 12:46:24 AM
- 1117 Views
What, your penis?
06/12/2009 02:40:09 AM
- 994 Views
Don't you know it!
06/12/2009 03:28:16 PM
- 902 Views
You talk the talk, that's for sure.
07/12/2009 08:14:41 PM
- 1049 Views
Metaphor versus literalism
04/12/2009 05:42:03 PM
- 1067 Views
Metaphor divorced from the reality runs risks, however.
04/12/2009 10:25:47 PM
- 982 Views
Honestly, the moral can always be dismissed as inapplicable if you want to dismiss it.
05/12/2009 12:16:39 AM
- 1044 Views
While that's true, it's much harder to just dismiss Mockingbird.
05/12/2009 03:57:42 AM
- 1007 Views
Then why read fiction at all? It's all a diversion.
05/12/2009 04:16:06 PM
- 1004 Views
I think people should read non-fiction, and The Nine Hundred Days is an excellent book.
05/12/2009 04:41:50 PM
- 991 Views
aha. but.
07/12/2009 03:56:48 PM
- 1194 Views