Active Users:291 Time:07/01/2025 01:56:37 PM
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time Mad Cow Bomber Send a noteboard - 05/10/2009 09:17:10 AM
More than that and it just gets confusing, I think. Right now I'm reading a book called "The Lost World of Genesis One", which is an examination of the book of Genesis and why it can't be read as a science textbook like some folks like to. Very good book. After that is "Slouching Towards Bethlehem", a collection of essays by Joan Didion.



That first one sounds intriguing. Does it have a religious outlook, or is it academic?


It is somewhat religious, but the author does spend some good time explaining why more religiously narrow interpretations (such as the six-day view, among others) are not appropriate ways to interpret the Genesis text, and why his view is not incompatible with modern science. He also compares the Genesis text to other contemporary creation texts, such as those from Babylon and Egypt. If you're a Christian already, and are as tired of the creation/evolution debate as I am, I would definitely recommend it.
"The rent we pay for the little space we occupy on earth is the service we render to others."
Reply to message
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were? - 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM 1766 Views
I'm reading three books right now. - 23/09/2009 09:30:53 AM 1446 Views
I am on 20 - 23/09/2009 10:00:39 AM 1264 Views
Yes - 23/09/2009 09:41:31 AM 1404 Views
Re: Yes - 23/09/2009 09:59:16 AM 1370 Views
Not really - 23/09/2009 06:10:18 PM 1406 Views
I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM 1336 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM 1408 Views
Hmm - 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM 1355 Views
Re: Hmm - 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM 1331 Views
I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:38:14 PM 1380 Views
Re: I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:39:47 PM 1140 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM 1286 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 01:17:05 PM 1358 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 05/10/2009 09:17:10 AM 1369 Views
Yes. - 23/09/2009 12:17:14 PM 1242 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 01:17:41 PM 1314 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 02:55:43 PM 1254 Views
Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 12:44:45 PM 1349 Views
Re: Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 01:18:58 PM 1323 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM 1230 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM 1291 Views
If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:26:06 PM 1221 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:38:59 PM 1378 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 03:15:12 PM 1221 Views
Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 01:49:00 PM 1345 Views
Re: Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 02:36:23 PM 1290 Views
Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:56:47 PM 1307 Views
Re: Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:58:28 PM 1265 Views
Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:14:02 PM 1235 Views
Re: Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM 1229 Views
Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:15:30 PM 1287 Views
Re: Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:17:35 PM 1318 Views
It sucks, believe me. - 02/10/2009 03:46:47 PM 1727 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now - 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM 1309 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now. - 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM 1367 Views
It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM 1207 Views
Re: It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:55:27 PM 1316 Views
Bought it. - 24/09/2009 04:13:44 PM 1293 Views
Re: Bought it. - 24/09/2009 05:39:16 PM 1269 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour. - 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM 1277 Views
Pfff, dream on *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:44:22 PM 651 Views
Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM 1263 Views
Re: Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 05:31:04 PM 1301 Views
some of them are starting to feel neglected, though. - 23/09/2009 05:44:23 PM 1337 Views
This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM 1308 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM 1327 Views
best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM 1329 Views
Re: best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM 1157 Views
that's a weird argument. - 23/09/2009 08:31:01 PM 1317 Views
Re: that's a weird argument. - 24/09/2009 09:18:57 AM 1229 Views
I was about to reply with something similar. - 23/09/2009 05:52:07 PM 1311 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM 1354 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM 1273 Views
That it is. - 23/09/2009 11:24:45 PM 1225 Views
hells no - 23/09/2009 07:27:49 PM 1254 Views
Sensible *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:54:22 PM 543 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM 1174 Views
Re: Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:55:06 PM 1152 Views
I don't read books I find boring unless I'm required to. - 23/09/2009 11:36:17 PM 1243 Views
nope - 23/09/2009 07:58:53 PM 1150 Views
Re: nope - 24/09/2009 09:18:28 AM 1232 Views
RT stole my post title. - 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM 1379 Views
Re: RT stole my post title. - 24/09/2009 09:54:13 AM 1138 Views
Well - 24/09/2009 08:00:12 PM 1490 Views
Re: Well - 25/09/2009 09:31:29 AM 1641 Views
Very Monogamous - 23/09/2009 11:02:32 PM 1410 Views
Re: Very Monogamous - 24/09/2009 09:55:50 AM 1299 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy. - 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM 1294 Views
In all things, or just marriage and books? *NM* - 24/09/2009 10:03:21 AM 633 Views
In principle I have nothing against multiple spouses. - 24/09/2009 11:08:49 PM 1253 Views
Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM 1340 Views
Re: Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM 1367 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM 1190 Views
Re: - 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM 1144 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM 1186 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM 1351 Views
That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM 1284 Views
Re: That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM 1164 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one - 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM 1243 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe - 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM 1339 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no? - 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM 1423 Views
where? - 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM 1196 Views
Here - 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM 1327 Views
I have of course read A Study in Emerald - 24/09/2009 03:48:45 PM 1271 Views
That's the earlier anthology - 24/09/2009 03:56:42 PM 1213 Views
Sort of - 24/09/2009 12:30:04 AM 1286 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 10:05:07 AM 1259 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 02:27:14 PM 1304 Views
Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 04:43:06 AM 1317 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 10:06:10 AM 1285 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 26/09/2009 05:06:07 PM 1471 Views
No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 06:22:24 AM 1285 Views
Re: No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 10:08:26 AM 1402 Views
Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM 1287 Views
Re: Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 02:59:42 PM 1335 Views
No, confusion has nothing to do with it. - 25/09/2009 02:08:16 PM 1381 Views
mmm, polyamory! - 24/09/2009 05:48:04 PM 1238 Views
People must understand that we have urges that cannot always be - 24/09/2009 05:49:25 PM 1142 Views
I used to only read one at a time - 24/09/2009 08:46:46 PM 1408 Views
Re: I used to only read one at a time - 25/09/2009 09:33:30 AM 1341 Views
Only read One book at a time. You make me feel bad. - 25/09/2009 02:44:51 AM 1226 Views
On behalf of my books? - 25/09/2009 09:40:37 AM 1110 Views
Honestly, - 25/09/2009 03:07:53 AM 1346 Views
Re: Honestly, - 25/09/2009 09:42:04 AM 1246 Views
I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 04:50:48 PM 1334 Views
Re: I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 07:05:21 PM 1398 Views
No - 02/10/2009 05:02:51 PM 1318 Views
Re: No - 02/10/2009 07:45:39 PM 1352 Views

Reply to Message