I thought the second half was more impressive, actually.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 30/09/2013 09:04:21 PM
View original postI agree with you on the second half. I kept thinking I might have preferred more of the first, but I am not sure that's fair. My biggest problem was lack of empathy with the main character, though I know that isn't fair. It was just hard.
Because the first half, well, the premise does half of the work if you see what I mean. It may be a brilliant premise, but once you hit on the idea, it's not that hard to flesh it out - not nearly as hard as it is to throw things open in the second half and tackle not only Jack's traumatizing experiences in the world outside, but also his mother's attempts to pick her life back up, his grandparents being torn between love and disgust by his presence, etc.
I would argue that while the first half was what made people sit up and take notice of the book, the second half was what got it on the Booker shortlist and all those glowing reviews.
Speaking of reviews
14/09/2013 01:03:44 AM
- 807 Views
i read that a while back. i found it amazing. i love emma donoghue, and had read her other books
14/09/2013 02:38:42 AM
- 602 Views
I reviewed it back in October 2010, when it was a National Book Award finalist
15/09/2013 12:48:53 PM
- 832 Views
It was indeed an interesting read.
17/09/2013 12:37:35 AM
- 692 Views
Yup
30/09/2013 07:39:05 PM
- 622 Views
I thought the second half was more impressive, actually.
30/09/2013 09:04:21 PM
- 512 Views