Active Users:783 Time:24/11/2024 10:19:49 AM
I thought the second half was more impressive, actually. Legolas Send a noteboard - 30/09/2013 09:04:21 PM

View original postI agree with you on the second half. I kept thinking I might have preferred more of the first, but I am not sure that's fair. My biggest problem was lack of empathy with the main character, though I know that isn't fair. It was just hard.

Because the first half, well, the premise does half of the work if you see what I mean. It may be a brilliant premise, but once you hit on the idea, it's not that hard to flesh it out - not nearly as hard as it is to throw things open in the second half and tackle not only Jack's traumatizing experiences in the world outside, but also his mother's attempts to pick her life back up, his grandparents being torn between love and disgust by his presence, etc.

I would argue that while the first half was what made people sit up and take notice of the book, the second half was what got it on the Booker shortlist and all those glowing reviews.

Reply to message
Speaking of reviews - 14/09/2013 01:03:44 AM 807 Views
i read that a while back. i found it amazing. i love emma donoghue, and had read her other books - 14/09/2013 02:38:42 AM 602 Views
You should re-read! - 15/09/2013 05:02:53 AM 637 Views
after i finish mistborn again i'll consider it... *NM* - 18/09/2013 06:11:13 PM 246 Views
I read it three years ago, definitely a very good book. *NM* - 14/09/2013 10:29:59 AM 258 Views
Looks interesting, it reminded me somewhat of this book... - 15/09/2013 02:49:23 AM 705 Views
Oh wow, yeah. - 15/09/2013 05:03:37 AM 547 Views
It was indeed an interesting read. - 17/09/2013 12:37:35 AM 692 Views
Yup - 30/09/2013 07:39:05 PM 622 Views
I thought the second half was more impressive, actually. - 30/09/2013 09:04:21 PM 512 Views

Reply to Message