You need to apply the same standard to books that you do to professional Wrestling(get well King) and vice versa.
There is a place for the over analysis of prose you love to indulge in, but that place is mainly within the walls of acedamia. In the real world, a good book is one that people enjoy; the Drizzt books qualify.
There is a place for the over analysis of prose you love to indulge in, but that place is mainly within the walls of acedamia. In the real world, a good book is one that people enjoy; the Drizzt books qualify.
In the real world, a book can be entertaining or enjoyable and still be bad. The notion that a book has to be good because people enjoy it is almost as silly as a book being good because it sells well.
Now, I am a fan of Bob's. The Drizzt books introduced me to fantasy and really got me back into reading. Hell, I'm even a moderator on his official forums. But there is no denying that his books are poorly written. They are enjoyable. They are entertaining. They aren't very good. Seems like most of the people who argue that they are tend to be the ones who haven't really read anything other than tie-ins.
"It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way."
This may be one of the most dire reviews you shall ever read
09/09/2012 09:12:25 PM
- 2139 Views
A review of a D&D bestiary could be more dire.
09/09/2012 11:29:17 PM
- 1242 Views
Perhaps
09/09/2012 11:50:20 PM
- 1352 Views
They are popular as they are fun, easy reading books
10/09/2012 12:11:24 AM
- 1329 Views
"Popular", "Fun," and "Easy" doesn't have to be equated with poorly-written
10/09/2012 12:16:27 AM
- 1457 Views
Poorly written by what standard?
10/09/2012 12:29:17 AM
- 1411 Views
By the standards of what I enjoyed as a nine year-old?
10/09/2012 01:04:12 AM
- 1352 Views
So like I said, by the standards of Elitist Literary Snobs
11/09/2012 12:03:08 AM
- 1457 Views
Nice attempt at sophistry, but alas, it fails
11/09/2012 12:38:24 AM
- 1354 Views
Was that meant to make any sense?
11/09/2012 01:43:13 AM
- 1506 Views
Re: Was that meant to make any sense?
11/09/2012 01:54:23 AM
- 1348 Views
I'm with Wibble on this (big surprise)
12/09/2012 03:07:53 PM
- 1466 Views
Heh.
12/09/2012 03:43:52 PM
- 1497 Views
Pretty much so
12/09/2012 04:19:35 PM
- 1487 Views
When did you put up that header?
12/09/2012 04:35:20 PM
- 1371 Views
I didn't put it up
12/09/2012 04:51:32 PM
- 1277 Views
I shall tread lightly so.
12/09/2012 06:15:51 PM
- 1406 Views
12/09/2012 07:25:29 PM
- 1262 Views

Re: Pretty much so
12/09/2012 08:50:57 PM
- 1394 Views
You apparently do not read my blog/reviews much
12/09/2012 09:07:18 PM
- 1412 Views
Actually, I read them almost never
13/09/2012 03:07:48 PM
- 1449 Views
I think my IQ dropped a little bit when I parsed what you said
13/09/2012 04:16:21 PM
- 1407 Views
Yep, your usual rebuttal... *NM*
17/09/2012 02:14:56 PM
- 683 Views
No, not really
17/09/2012 06:25:15 PM
- 1218 Views
Yes, Yes, wrap yourself in arrogance and declare yourself correct until your opposite gets bored...
17/09/2012 11:12:17 PM
- 1535 Views
Don't try to argue with them. They've made their judgments. They are better than you.
10/09/2012 09:36:17 PM
- 1364 Views
Defensive much?
*NM*
10/09/2012 10:31:17 PM
- 740 Views

Perhaps. It's annoying, because I tend to agree with you guys - you and Tom and Stephen.
11/09/2012 02:32:28 AM
- 1361 Views
The odd thing that there wasn't any belittling on my part -see other response. *NM*
11/09/2012 03:17:36 AM
- 686 Views
For the record, I wasn't trying to be condescending in my response.
11/09/2012 05:52:29 PM
- 1372 Views
He never said you couldn't enjoy it.
10/09/2012 11:10:11 PM
- 1478 Views
He also went on to compare liking the books to having the standards of a nine-year-old.
11/09/2012 02:34:18 AM
- 1346 Views
You didn't read what I said very well then
11/09/2012 03:16:21 AM
- 1344 Views
You're right. In the context of this thread, I'm basically acting like a raving lunatic.
11/09/2012 02:48:19 PM
- 1375 Views
It's not like any of us have ever been innocent 100% of the time
11/09/2012 03:49:22 PM
- 1307 Views

I believe that they were not meant for adults.
10/09/2012 12:30:05 AM
- 1361 Views
Very few of my friends were reading the books; some played the game, though
10/09/2012 01:06:07 AM
- 1334 Views
Basically, both get dubious kudos for trying something new by the dire standards of the day.
10/09/2012 11:38:22 PM
- 1376 Views
Interesting point
11/09/2012 12:41:01 AM
- 1342 Views
Are you aware of the game's alignment rules? Some of the novels struggle with this.
12/09/2012 10:58:37 PM
- 1354 Views
Not aware of it at all until now
12/09/2012 11:18:57 PM
- 1344 Views
How is that possible?
12/09/2012 11:28:33 PM
- 1301 Views
My dad was (and is) influenced by Evangelicals
13/09/2012 12:17:36 AM
- 1249 Views
Wait, so you didn't read the Chronicles first?
13/09/2012 02:12:13 PM
- 1250 Views
No
13/09/2012 02:18:03 PM
- 1324 Views
Chronicles is considerably weaker
13/09/2012 11:14:38 PM
- 1351 Views
Needless to say, once I finish reading the Icewind Dale trilogy, I'm done with D&D
14/09/2012 12:38:47 AM
- 1458 Views

These threads are so much better than the rape threads! *NM*
12/09/2012 04:03:01 AM
- 764 Views
You're just waiting to see if I'll use hexameter in the next one
*NM*
12/09/2012 04:32:31 AM
- 608 Views

And having now finished Dragonlance: Legends, its very own sonnet
13/09/2012 12:31:51 PM
- 1335 Views

At least you didn't read the Baldur's Gate novelizations
14/09/2012 04:29:17 AM
- 1270 Views
Sssssh!
14/09/2012 05:10:19 AM
- 1338 Views
Baldurs Gate wooooo!
14/09/2012 04:13:34 PM
- 1393 Views
Eh, Star Wars Expanded Universe I could see reading. Some of them are supposed to be good
17/09/2012 04:37:05 PM
- 1699 Views
Is the review dire because of the subject or the sonnet form?
14/09/2012 04:24:37 PM
- 1309 Views
Both
14/09/2012 04:36:59 PM
- 1284 Views

it would be unusual for someone to just randomly pick books like that up
14/09/2012 05:05:37 PM
- 1545 Views
Interesting scenario
14/09/2012 10:16:11 PM
- 1305 Views