You need to apply the same standard to books that you do to professional Wrestling(get well King) and vice versa.
There is a place for the over analysis of prose you love to indulge in, but that place is mainly within the walls of acedamia. In the real world, a good book is one that people enjoy; the Drizzt books qualify.
There is a place for the over analysis of prose you love to indulge in, but that place is mainly within the walls of acedamia. In the real world, a good book is one that people enjoy; the Drizzt books qualify.
In the real world, a book can be entertaining or enjoyable and still be bad. The notion that a book has to be good because people enjoy it is almost as silly as a book being good because it sells well.
Now, I am a fan of Bob's. The Drizzt books introduced me to fantasy and really got me back into reading. Hell, I'm even a moderator on his official forums. But there is no denying that his books are poorly written. They are enjoyable. They are entertaining. They aren't very good. Seems like most of the people who argue that they are tend to be the ones who haven't really read anything other than tie-ins.
"It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way."
This may be one of the most dire reviews you shall ever read
09/09/2012 09:12:25 PM
- 2068 Views
A review of a D&D bestiary could be more dire.
09/09/2012 11:29:17 PM
- 1177 Views
Perhaps
09/09/2012 11:50:20 PM
- 1274 Views
They are popular as they are fun, easy reading books
10/09/2012 12:11:24 AM
- 1253 Views
"Popular", "Fun," and "Easy" doesn't have to be equated with poorly-written
10/09/2012 12:16:27 AM
- 1399 Views
Poorly written by what standard?
10/09/2012 12:29:17 AM
- 1343 Views
By the standards of what I enjoyed as a nine year-old?
10/09/2012 01:04:12 AM
- 1290 Views
So like I said, by the standards of Elitist Literary Snobs
11/09/2012 12:03:08 AM
- 1393 Views
Nice attempt at sophistry, but alas, it fails
11/09/2012 12:38:24 AM
- 1283 Views
Was that meant to make any sense?
11/09/2012 01:43:13 AM
- 1441 Views
Re: Was that meant to make any sense?
11/09/2012 01:54:23 AM
- 1296 Views
I'm with Wibble on this (big surprise)
12/09/2012 03:07:53 PM
- 1408 Views
Heh.
12/09/2012 03:43:52 PM
- 1429 Views
Pretty much so
12/09/2012 04:19:35 PM
- 1419 Views
When did you put up that header?
12/09/2012 04:35:20 PM
- 1306 Views
I didn't put it up
12/09/2012 04:51:32 PM
- 1207 Views
I shall tread lightly so.
12/09/2012 06:15:51 PM
- 1337 Views
12/09/2012 07:25:29 PM
- 1200 Views
Re: Pretty much so
12/09/2012 08:50:57 PM
- 1329 Views
You apparently do not read my blog/reviews much
12/09/2012 09:07:18 PM
- 1344 Views
Actually, I read them almost never
13/09/2012 03:07:48 PM
- 1386 Views
I think my IQ dropped a little bit when I parsed what you said
13/09/2012 04:16:21 PM
- 1337 Views
Yep, your usual rebuttal... *NM*
17/09/2012 02:14:56 PM
- 666 Views
No, not really
17/09/2012 06:25:15 PM
- 1181 Views
Yes, Yes, wrap yourself in arrogance and declare yourself correct until your opposite gets bored...
17/09/2012 11:12:17 PM
- 1468 Views
Don't try to argue with them. They've made their judgments. They are better than you.
10/09/2012 09:36:17 PM
- 1308 Views
Defensive much? *NM*
10/09/2012 10:31:17 PM
- 710 Views
Perhaps. It's annoying, because I tend to agree with you guys - you and Tom and Stephen.
11/09/2012 02:32:28 AM
- 1297 Views
The odd thing that there wasn't any belittling on my part -see other response. *NM*
11/09/2012 03:17:36 AM
- 661 Views
For the record, I wasn't trying to be condescending in my response.
11/09/2012 05:52:29 PM
- 1301 Views
He never said you couldn't enjoy it.
10/09/2012 11:10:11 PM
- 1442 Views
He also went on to compare liking the books to having the standards of a nine-year-old.
11/09/2012 02:34:18 AM
- 1287 Views
You didn't read what I said very well then
11/09/2012 03:16:21 AM
- 1304 Views
You're right. In the context of this thread, I'm basically acting like a raving lunatic.
11/09/2012 02:48:19 PM
- 1310 Views
It's not like any of us have ever been innocent 100% of the time
11/09/2012 03:49:22 PM
- 1249 Views
I believe that they were not meant for adults.
10/09/2012 12:30:05 AM
- 1300 Views
Very few of my friends were reading the books; some played the game, though
10/09/2012 01:06:07 AM
- 1268 Views
Basically, both get dubious kudos for trying something new by the dire standards of the day.
10/09/2012 11:38:22 PM
- 1307 Views
Interesting point
11/09/2012 12:41:01 AM
- 1270 Views
Are you aware of the game's alignment rules? Some of the novels struggle with this.
12/09/2012 10:58:37 PM
- 1285 Views
Not aware of it at all until now
12/09/2012 11:18:57 PM
- 1283 Views
How is that possible?
12/09/2012 11:28:33 PM
- 1228 Views
My dad was (and is) influenced by Evangelicals
13/09/2012 12:17:36 AM
- 1191 Views
Wait, so you didn't read the Chronicles first?
13/09/2012 02:12:13 PM
- 1186 Views
No
13/09/2012 02:18:03 PM
- 1255 Views
Chronicles is considerably weaker
13/09/2012 11:14:38 PM
- 1286 Views
Needless to say, once I finish reading the Icewind Dale trilogy, I'm done with D&D
14/09/2012 12:38:47 AM
- 1398 Views
These threads are so much better than the rape threads! *NM*
12/09/2012 04:03:01 AM
- 740 Views
You're just waiting to see if I'll use hexameter in the next one *NM*
12/09/2012 04:32:31 AM
- 582 Views
And having now finished Dragonlance: Legends, its very own sonnet
13/09/2012 12:31:51 PM
- 1298 Views
At least you didn't read the Baldur's Gate novelizations
14/09/2012 04:29:17 AM
- 1205 Views
Sssssh!
14/09/2012 05:10:19 AM
- 1269 Views
Baldurs Gate wooooo!
14/09/2012 04:13:34 PM
- 1329 Views
Eh, Star Wars Expanded Universe I could see reading. Some of them are supposed to be good
17/09/2012 04:37:05 PM
- 1633 Views
Is the review dire because of the subject or the sonnet form?
14/09/2012 04:24:37 PM
- 1242 Views
Both
14/09/2012 04:36:59 PM
- 1224 Views
it would be unusual for someone to just randomly pick books like that up
14/09/2012 05:05:37 PM
- 1487 Views
Interesting scenario
14/09/2012 10:16:11 PM
- 1246 Views