Now you just sound like some wine snob going on about gooseberries, summer mornings, a hint of rose but with deep woody charcoal aftertase...
I'd settle for a nice Tokaj right about now, but only Boone's Farm is available where I live
...it's just wine drink it, if you don't like it, drink something else. If you want to elevate it to something more than that, go wild, have a ball, but dont expect the rest of society to join you on that journey. People generally drink wine to get tipsy to a greater or lesser extent, and wine snobs or 'experts' if you will may harp on about all the so called virtues of the wine, but to the majority as long as it hits the spot, job done. People generally read books to enjoy a story, it's no different.
I think the intended thrust of the post was lost somewhere, maybe on the way to Albuquerque. Some people understand why they enjoy something (or don't) and that makes their enjoyment deeper. What's so hard about accepting that point?
In so many fields were people analyse to the nth degree, they lose sight of what the majority are looking for. Fashionistas, go on about empowerment, colour style blah blah blah, does it cover us, look good and get us laid? Yup job done. Do films amuse, entertain, occaisonally inform? Yup, job done. Gastronomy may wax lyrical about flavouring and ingredients and harmony and all the rest, but to most people, did it tatse good and was it filling? Yup job done.
Ah, you're tilting against windmills here. You need a Sancho at your side.
I have no idea what your first paragraph said, seriously, I regard it with the same smile of amusement I hold for those wine peeps. Your original question was "How these are popular with so many is what I am trying to understand." The answer is exactly what I said it was, easy, fun, entertaining read.
You realize that my comment was a rhetorical one, right? I clarified it in response to Stephen.
Perhaps the real question should be - why are you so unwilling to accept that people read books for fun and stories, and as long as that is achieved, it is 'well' written. You mock your own love of wrestling, yet whilst I dont watch wrestling these days, and haven't for years, I would still regard it as one of the best produced pieces of entertainment around. Not for me anymore, but a masterpiece of what it's trying to achieve - sports entertainment. Not everything has to have 'worth' and sometimes fun and entertainment is easily worthwile enough.
I'm beginning to think you are willfully not getting the point, that of there being societal standards with which one may or may not agree in part/full, but within which there is leeway to like the unhip, the uncool, the drab, the boring, and even the poorly-written. The irony is that I'm not railing against those who do like these things, unlike a certain someone who seems to off on a harangue against real and perceived opponents to his own tastes
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
This may be one of the most dire reviews you shall ever read
09/09/2012 09:12:25 PM
- 2053 Views
A review of a D&D bestiary could be more dire.
09/09/2012 11:29:17 PM
- 1162 Views
Perhaps
09/09/2012 11:50:20 PM
- 1260 Views
They are popular as they are fun, easy reading books
10/09/2012 12:11:24 AM
- 1241 Views
"Popular", "Fun," and "Easy" doesn't have to be equated with poorly-written
10/09/2012 12:16:27 AM
- 1387 Views
Poorly written by what standard?
10/09/2012 12:29:17 AM
- 1334 Views
By the standards of what I enjoyed as a nine year-old?
10/09/2012 01:04:12 AM
- 1278 Views
So like I said, by the standards of Elitist Literary Snobs
11/09/2012 12:03:08 AM
- 1384 Views
Nice attempt at sophistry, but alas, it fails
11/09/2012 12:38:24 AM
- 1270 Views
Was that meant to make any sense?
11/09/2012 01:43:13 AM
- 1429 Views
Re: Was that meant to make any sense?
11/09/2012 01:54:23 AM
- 1283 Views
I'm with Wibble on this (big surprise)
12/09/2012 03:07:53 PM
- 1391 Views
Heh.
12/09/2012 03:43:52 PM
- 1416 Views
Pretty much so
12/09/2012 04:19:35 PM
- 1408 Views
When did you put up that header?
12/09/2012 04:35:20 PM
- 1291 Views
I didn't put it up
12/09/2012 04:51:32 PM
- 1192 Views
I shall tread lightly so.
12/09/2012 06:15:51 PM
- 1325 Views
12/09/2012 07:25:29 PM
- 1185 Views
Re: Pretty much so
12/09/2012 08:50:57 PM
- 1316 Views
You apparently do not read my blog/reviews much
12/09/2012 09:07:18 PM
- 1333 Views
Actually, I read them almost never
13/09/2012 03:07:48 PM
- 1375 Views
I think my IQ dropped a little bit when I parsed what you said
13/09/2012 04:16:21 PM
- 1326 Views
Yep, your usual rebuttal... *NM*
17/09/2012 02:14:56 PM
- 660 Views
No, not really
17/09/2012 06:25:15 PM
- 1168 Views
Yes, Yes, wrap yourself in arrogance and declare yourself correct until your opposite gets bored...
17/09/2012 11:12:17 PM
- 1456 Views
Don't try to argue with them. They've made their judgments. They are better than you.
10/09/2012 09:36:17 PM
- 1297 Views
Defensive much? *NM*
10/09/2012 10:31:17 PM
- 705 Views
Perhaps. It's annoying, because I tend to agree with you guys - you and Tom and Stephen.
11/09/2012 02:32:28 AM
- 1278 Views
The odd thing that there wasn't any belittling on my part -see other response. *NM*
11/09/2012 03:17:36 AM
- 655 Views
For the record, I wasn't trying to be condescending in my response.
11/09/2012 05:52:29 PM
- 1286 Views
He never said you couldn't enjoy it.
10/09/2012 11:10:11 PM
- 1427 Views
He also went on to compare liking the books to having the standards of a nine-year-old.
11/09/2012 02:34:18 AM
- 1276 Views
You didn't read what I said very well then
11/09/2012 03:16:21 AM
- 1290 Views
You're right. In the context of this thread, I'm basically acting like a raving lunatic.
11/09/2012 02:48:19 PM
- 1298 Views
It's not like any of us have ever been innocent 100% of the time
11/09/2012 03:49:22 PM
- 1234 Views
I believe that they were not meant for adults.
10/09/2012 12:30:05 AM
- 1285 Views
Very few of my friends were reading the books; some played the game, though
10/09/2012 01:06:07 AM
- 1252 Views
Basically, both get dubious kudos for trying something new by the dire standards of the day.
10/09/2012 11:38:22 PM
- 1291 Views
Interesting point
11/09/2012 12:41:01 AM
- 1254 Views
Are you aware of the game's alignment rules? Some of the novels struggle with this.
12/09/2012 10:58:37 PM
- 1269 Views
Not aware of it at all until now
12/09/2012 11:18:57 PM
- 1266 Views
How is that possible?
12/09/2012 11:28:33 PM
- 1210 Views
My dad was (and is) influenced by Evangelicals
13/09/2012 12:17:36 AM
- 1176 Views
Wait, so you didn't read the Chronicles first?
13/09/2012 02:12:13 PM
- 1166 Views
No
13/09/2012 02:18:03 PM
- 1239 Views
Chronicles is considerably weaker
13/09/2012 11:14:38 PM
- 1270 Views
Needless to say, once I finish reading the Icewind Dale trilogy, I'm done with D&D
14/09/2012 12:38:47 AM
- 1379 Views
These threads are so much better than the rape threads! *NM*
12/09/2012 04:03:01 AM
- 733 Views
You're just waiting to see if I'll use hexameter in the next one *NM*
12/09/2012 04:32:31 AM
- 573 Views
And having now finished Dragonlance: Legends, its very own sonnet
13/09/2012 12:31:51 PM
- 1283 Views
At least you didn't read the Baldur's Gate novelizations
14/09/2012 04:29:17 AM
- 1192 Views
Sssssh!
14/09/2012 05:10:19 AM
- 1253 Views
Baldurs Gate wooooo!
14/09/2012 04:13:34 PM
- 1315 Views
Eh, Star Wars Expanded Universe I could see reading. Some of them are supposed to be good
17/09/2012 04:37:05 PM
- 1619 Views
Is the review dire because of the subject or the sonnet form?
14/09/2012 04:24:37 PM
- 1230 Views
Both
14/09/2012 04:36:59 PM
- 1209 Views
it would be unusual for someone to just randomly pick books like that up
14/09/2012 05:05:37 PM
- 1474 Views
Interesting scenario
14/09/2012 10:16:11 PM
- 1232 Views