Active Users:1210 Time:22/11/2024 01:34:48 PM
duly noted. badassashaman Send a noteboard - 02/06/2012 01:28:00 PM
And I agree the book sucked, by the way, I could go on and on about how horrible it was in the same manner as you, and happily. I've done it before. And, people tend to be very glad to discuss Erikson on the board. But the thing is, your post was really fucking stupid. The book did suck, but you focused on one superficial and incorrrect problem with it that is easily explained away rather than addressing the book as a whole, and you did it with spelling errors and all caps. What do you expect? You came of as an idiot. I doubt you are, but just the same.

For the record, Krul being female is explained by the fact that Krul as a deity transcends gender and took on a female aspect. It was a bit unprecedented, if I recall the series correctly, but it's not terribly bizarre given Erikson's fecund cosmology, it suggests an additional level of depth to his universe. Esslemont is not illiterate, or a moron, and he helped build that world, with those gods, and those rules along with Erikson, in equal part. He did not make a mistake. You did reading it. The book sucks, though, true.


I know it wasn't the most eloquent of posts but at least someone could agree or disagree. This board used to actually care about such things.

Jeez. I might as well retire from this place. Should I even bother writing a review or will its ligaments and superficial tissues simply be picked apart by uncaring vultures of conformity and apathy while its meat and bones goes undevoured by you carrion of complacency?!?

*sigh*

btw, the rest of the book sucked too.


and thanks for playing.
Reply to message
Why Esselmont is an illiterate, lazy, MORON. - 31/05/2012 02:24:16 AM 1782 Views
I could point out the irony here. - 31/05/2012 03:37:24 AM 925 Views
Rants do that to me. Sorry. *NM* - 31/05/2012 01:59:04 PM 308 Views
Re: I could point out the irony here. - 31/05/2012 02:10:08 PM 718 Views
I did write that at like half three in the morning. - 31/05/2012 04:24:29 PM 690 Views
My bad. - 31/05/2012 06:08:19 PM 654 Views
Ahh. I hadn't paid attention to the timestamp of your post. *NM* - 01/06/2012 01:55:40 PM 324 Views
No worries. *NM* - 01/06/2012 02:05:50 PM 306 Views
Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here *NM* - 01/06/2012 11:42:29 AM 641 Views
ROTLFMOA! *NM* - 01/06/2012 01:58:41 PM 334 Views
Re: Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here <--- that's ungrammatical!! - 01/06/2012 04:37:56 PM 1151 Views
- 01/06/2012 05:08:06 PM 927 Views
well, in that case your answer for how could be "because of tn native speakers of engish" perhaps... - 06/06/2012 03:38:03 AM 784 Views
Pfft! - 07/06/2012 06:59:35 AM 582 Views
Re: Pfft! - 08/06/2012 08:06:14 PM 879 Views
Deitic anaphora? Jw. *NM* - 02/06/2012 02:58:26 AM 416 Views
Oh, damn you all. - 02/06/2012 04:13:40 AM 688 Views
Dude, it's because your post sucked. - 02/06/2012 12:43:03 PM 979 Views
duly noted. - 02/06/2012 01:28:00 PM 813 Views
Pfft! - 02/06/2012 05:00:30 PM 868 Views
I look forward to hearing about them. - 03/06/2012 11:16:51 PM 658 Views

Reply to Message