Active Users:315 Time:09/04/2025 04:25:02 AM
Deitic anaphora? Jw. *NM* Dan Send a noteboard - 02/06/2012 02:58:26 AM

how is that grammatical for you? i don't know any people who would think that sentence is ok.

"here" has no referent coherent to the sentence - when you take it to mean rafo, the "in america" renders the sentence ungrammatical...because rafo isn't in america, and that makes the sentence disjointed... i'd have said "only by americans is esslemont misspelled here"
Reply to message
Why Esselmont is an illiterate, lazy, MORON. - 31/05/2012 02:24:16 AM 1852 Views
I could point out the irony here. - 31/05/2012 03:37:24 AM 995 Views
Rants do that to me. Sorry. *NM* - 31/05/2012 01:59:04 PM 331 Views
Re: I could point out the irony here. - 31/05/2012 02:10:08 PM 782 Views
I did write that at like half three in the morning. - 31/05/2012 04:24:29 PM 758 Views
My bad. - 31/05/2012 06:08:19 PM 722 Views
Ahh. I hadn't paid attention to the timestamp of your post. *NM* - 01/06/2012 01:55:40 PM 345 Views
No worries. *NM* - 01/06/2012 02:05:50 PM 330 Views
Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here *NM* - 01/06/2012 11:42:29 AM 669 Views
ROTLFMOA! *NM* - 01/06/2012 01:58:41 PM 361 Views
Re: Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here <--- that's ungrammatical!! - 01/06/2012 04:37:56 PM 1213 Views
- 01/06/2012 05:08:06 PM 1000 Views
well, in that case your answer for how could be "because of tn native speakers of engish" perhaps... - 06/06/2012 03:38:03 AM 855 Views
Pfft! - 07/06/2012 06:59:35 AM 653 Views
Re: Pfft! - 08/06/2012 08:06:14 PM 959 Views
Deitic anaphora? Jw. *NM* - 02/06/2012 02:58:26 AM 450 Views
Oh, damn you all. - 02/06/2012 04:13:40 AM 763 Views
Dude, it's because your post sucked. - 02/06/2012 12:43:03 PM 1055 Views
duly noted. - 02/06/2012 01:28:00 PM 881 Views
Pfft! - 02/06/2012 05:00:30 PM 961 Views
I look forward to hearing about them. - 03/06/2012 11:16:51 PM 725 Views

Reply to Message