Active Users:1136 Time:22/11/2024 01:21:03 PM
Re: Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here <--- that's ungrammatical!! temeraire Send a noteboard - 01/06/2012 04:37:56 PM

how is that grammatical for you? i don't know any people who would think that sentence is ok.

"here" has no referent coherent to the sentence - when you take it to mean rafo, the "in america" renders the sentence ungrammatical...because rafo isn't in america, and that makes the sentence disjointed... i'd have said "only by americans is esslemont misspelled here"
"it's like the real world, except there's dragons!"

cw, you are missed...
Reply to message
Why Esselmont is an illiterate, lazy, MORON. - 31/05/2012 02:24:16 AM 1781 Views
I could point out the irony here. - 31/05/2012 03:37:24 AM 924 Views
Rants do that to me. Sorry. *NM* - 31/05/2012 01:59:04 PM 307 Views
Re: I could point out the irony here. - 31/05/2012 02:10:08 PM 718 Views
I did write that at like half three in the morning. - 31/05/2012 04:24:29 PM 690 Views
My bad. - 31/05/2012 06:08:19 PM 654 Views
Ahh. I hadn't paid attention to the timestamp of your post. *NM* - 01/06/2012 01:55:40 PM 324 Views
No worries. *NM* - 01/06/2012 02:05:50 PM 306 Views
Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here *NM* - 01/06/2012 11:42:29 AM 640 Views
ROTLFMOA! *NM* - 01/06/2012 01:58:41 PM 333 Views
Re: Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here <--- that's ungrammatical!! - 01/06/2012 04:37:56 PM 1151 Views
- 01/06/2012 05:08:06 PM 927 Views
well, in that case your answer for how could be "because of tn native speakers of engish" perhaps... - 06/06/2012 03:38:03 AM 784 Views
Pfft! - 07/06/2012 06:59:35 AM 582 Views
Re: Pfft! - 08/06/2012 08:06:14 PM 879 Views
Deitic anaphora? Jw. *NM* - 02/06/2012 02:58:26 AM 416 Views
Oh, damn you all. - 02/06/2012 04:13:40 AM 687 Views
Dude, it's because your post sucked. - 02/06/2012 12:43:03 PM 979 Views
duly noted. - 02/06/2012 01:28:00 PM 812 Views
Pfft! - 02/06/2012 05:00:30 PM 867 Views
I look forward to hearing about them. - 03/06/2012 11:16:51 PM 658 Views

Reply to Message