Million-to-one chances, a huge army being scared shitless going up against 10 guys and so on.
--- signature starts here ---
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins?
20/09/2009 01:01:18 PM
- 1221 Views
Re: Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins?
20/09/2009 01:17:00 PM
- 838 Views
Well, usually the bigger army are the invaders. Defence tends to have an edge
20/09/2009 04:38:45 PM
- 876 Views
It's an essential plot device
20/09/2009 04:41:04 PM
- 880 Views
Yeah but...
20/09/2009 07:38:36 PM
- 843 Views
I don't quite agree
21/09/2009 01:22:45 AM
- 788 Views
I'm sitting here trying to think if I've read any books like that...
21/09/2009 01:40:08 AM
- 716 Views
Fail.
21/09/2009 04:43:24 AM
- 930 Views
Hrmm...guess Miéville failed to follow the script then *NM*
20/09/2009 07:48:29 PM
- 299 Views
and a lot of others. But there's a rumour somewhere that it's not the size that matters... *NM*
20/09/2009 07:53:41 PM
- 296 Views
It's still a valid point, even if one author doesn't "follow the script." *NM*
25/09/2009 12:34:48 AM
- 351 Views
Re: Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins?
20/09/2009 08:45:48 PM
- 982 Views
That, and...
20/09/2009 09:08:48 PM
- 842 Views
Nineteen Eighty-Four, baby!
20/09/2009 10:37:05 PM
- 777 Views
That is not even fantasy...
21/09/2009 12:00:48 AM
- 775 Views
IT ISN'T?! *NM*
21/09/2009 01:42:16 AM
- 330 Views
Yeah, didn't your dad tell you about the double ungood days of the 80s? *NM*
21/09/2009 01:52:46 AM
- 318 Views
Doubleplusungood.
25/09/2009 02:09:27 AM
- 774 Views
Oops, sorry. Probably a thoughtcrime to put a space in. Rebellious waste of... pixels? Space? *NM*
25/09/2009 04:26:14 PM
- 339 Views
I agree. 1984 is not SF-F. *NM*
25/09/2009 12:36:46 AM
- 326 Views
All books should have a point, IMO. Otherwise, what's the point in reading them.
25/09/2009 04:32:43 PM
- 853 Views
Nineteen Eighty-Four is unquestionably Science Fiction. *NM*
26/09/2009 04:12:47 AM
- 377 Views
No, it's not. ScyFy does not lay claim to anything and everything that takes place...
26/09/2009 07:05:59 AM
- 733 Views
It's a novel which heavily relies upon futuristic technology. How is it not Science Fiction? *NM*
28/09/2009 01:43:23 AM
- 319 Views
I read it years ago and I don't remember any futuristic technology except...
28/09/2009 04:16:21 AM
- 823 Views
I would say that if a story uses that sort of thing, it has a science fiction element.
28/09/2009 05:20:39 AM
- 623 Views
Because you don't have to root for the huge army that's supposed to win.
21/09/2009 04:38:22 AM
- 795 Views
Pratchett makes much of this. *NM*
21/09/2009 04:11:04 PM
- 348 Views
"You can take our lives, but you can never take our freedom!" "...wrong!" *NM*
21/09/2009 11:02:25 PM
- 281 Views
Exactly what I was going to say
27/09/2009 02:55:02 PM
- 838 Views