I'm really interested in the evidence for the crawling thing.
Vivien Send a noteboard - 25/04/2012 08:11:31 PM
Crawling and good memory? First time I've ever heard this but I'm an example of an extreme of both, not that a single data point would prove anything. My mother did not want to teach me to walk (or even encourage it in any way) because she thought it was healthier- better exercise- I'm using all the muscles, I'm not putting pressure on my back, no falling down, etc. I don't know at what age I stopped crawling and decided to start walking but from the way my parents, grandparents, etc talk about it I crawled instead of walking longer than normal and I was very fast. Apparently I did start crawling pretty early, I just kept on crawling when other children started walking.
I don't have much to add to the descussion of early child development regarding to reading- I learned to read in the 1st grade (7 years old). But I learned fast and towards the middle/end of the 1st grade I was reading entirely by myself for fun- fairy tales, stories about animals, Frank Baum, etc. So I thought that's what the suggestions would be for...
I don't have much to add to the descussion of early child development regarding to reading- I learned to read in the 1st grade (7 years old). But I learned fast and towards the middle/end of the 1st grade I was reading entirely by myself for fun- fairy tales, stories about animals, Frank Baum, etc. So I thought that's what the suggestions would be for...
The thing about being a parent is that you really have to live through it to get to a point where you really can understand it. People who have no kids will not understand 90% of what you are going through, and having a girl who is now 3, I can say that so much of the first-time parenting that you go through in those first few months seems different from the distance of time and further experience.
It's certainly good to try to engage your baby with stimuli, but the simple fact is that all children develop along more or less the same lines for the first two years. Even after that, a lot seems to be out of the parents' hands. The classical music study has been thoroughly debunked, the high contrast toys are of questionable value and there's really little that seems to make much of a difference at all, except that there seems to be some correlation between extended crawling and good memory (so don't be worried if your daughter doesn't start walking right away; it might be a good thing).
The effort by parents to make sure their children don't end up disadvantaged is one that is milked by thousands of companies to their profit. For the parents, this means you end up spending more money than you need to on items you don't need and will quickly have no room for unless you have over 100 square meters of living space. The mantra "it will be useful if/when we have another child" is always invoked - which means you're going to have to spend a lot more money on storage boxes that will seal out the elements, or else you're going to find that you might not want to give the toy to the second child when you have one. We now have something like eight huge boxes (about 1 meter long, half a meter deep and half a meter wide) filled with toys, clothes, etc., and of course the bigger things are covered in plastic partially disassembled (the exersaucer, the bouncy chair, the baby baths - plural because our daughter hated the first two we bought, the mobiles, the activity mats, the baby gates, the training potty, the five different types of strollers, the different size car seats, etc.).
And, even if you buy some things in generic colors (black car seat, red stroller, etc.) so that it fits either sex for "the next time", you're still going to have to deal with the possibility that your next baby will hate something that you dropped a lot of money on (like a stroller, for example).
It's certainly good to try to engage your baby with stimuli, but the simple fact is that all children develop along more or less the same lines for the first two years. Even after that, a lot seems to be out of the parents' hands. The classical music study has been thoroughly debunked, the high contrast toys are of questionable value and there's really little that seems to make much of a difference at all, except that there seems to be some correlation between extended crawling and good memory (so don't be worried if your daughter doesn't start walking right away; it might be a good thing).
The effort by parents to make sure their children don't end up disadvantaged is one that is milked by thousands of companies to their profit. For the parents, this means you end up spending more money than you need to on items you don't need and will quickly have no room for unless you have over 100 square meters of living space. The mantra "it will be useful if/when we have another child" is always invoked - which means you're going to have to spend a lot more money on storage boxes that will seal out the elements, or else you're going to find that you might not want to give the toy to the second child when you have one. We now have something like eight huge boxes (about 1 meter long, half a meter deep and half a meter wide) filled with toys, clothes, etc., and of course the bigger things are covered in plastic partially disassembled (the exersaucer, the bouncy chair, the baby baths - plural because our daughter hated the first two we bought, the mobiles, the activity mats, the baby gates, the training potty, the five different types of strollers, the different size car seats, etc.).
And, even if you buy some things in generic colors (black car seat, red stroller, etc.) so that it fits either sex for "the next time", you're still going to have to deal with the possibility that your next baby will hate something that you dropped a lot of money on (like a stroller, for example).
Books for very small children: suggestions?
20/04/2012 12:19:39 AM
- 1471 Views
Really, before 18 months you're wasting your time
20/04/2012 01:26:05 AM
- 1113 Views
I dunno. I really enjoyed books when I was that young
20/04/2012 03:12:29 AM
- 1142 Views
At a year and a half?
20/04/2012 06:18:01 PM
- 994 Views
I don't remember reading quite that young, but I do remember not long after that.
20/04/2012 09:35:11 PM
- 1104 Views
Color me slightly skeptical.
21/04/2012 01:17:51 PM
- 1018 Views
I double checked. I was confusing it with another event. I was about 2.5 *NM*
22/04/2012 12:19:09 AM
- 591 Views
Similar experience here...
20/04/2012 07:04:51 PM
- 1273 Views
Yah, I was a bit like your niece
20/04/2012 09:30:02 PM
- 1253 Views
Re: Yah, I was a bit like your niece
20/04/2012 11:48:12 PM
- 1208 Views
Doesn't need to be an extended period of time, though. A few minutes is enough at the beginning.
23/04/2012 12:42:23 PM
- 1246 Views
No problem, if you just want to flush money down a toilet.
23/04/2012 02:29:57 PM
- 971 Views
Re: No problem, if you just want to flush money down a toilet.
23/04/2012 03:32:22 PM
- 1134 Views
Look, it's useless to discuss at this point but let's have the discussion again in 2 years.
23/04/2012 04:39:47 PM
- 1347 Views
I'm really interested in the evidence for the crawling thing.
25/04/2012 08:11:31 PM
- 1210 Views
I can't find actual scientific studies on the web
25/04/2012 09:56:14 PM
- 1009 Views
Re: I can't find actual scientific studies on the web
26/04/2012 03:45:40 AM
- 1401 Views
anyone who thinks an infant sleeping on its stomach is dangerous is behind the times.
26/04/2012 01:51:59 PM
- 1179 Views
If there was a big ad campaign in the UK about this then no-one told my medical team.
26/04/2012 07:40:48 PM
- 1088 Views
Hmmm. *shrug* I don't know. I trust this professor to have his facts straight.
26/04/2012 08:01:53 PM
- 1059 Views
Possible answer is difference between Scottish and English health systems.
26/04/2012 08:28:38 PM
- 1019 Views
weird. maybe trends have swung back the other way.
26/04/2012 10:01:01 PM
- 1020 Views
I hope you don't have it mixed up...
26/04/2012 10:18:00 PM
- 1120 Views
blagh. maybe I do...I hope not. I hate it when that happens. let me pull out that notebook...
27/04/2012 12:01:47 AM
- 1010 Views
Re: Look, it's useless to discuss at this point but let's have the discussion again in 2 years.
26/04/2012 01:39:25 PM
- 981 Views
OH! Another suggestion!
20/04/2012 03:36:45 AM
- 1306 Views
I LOVE that book.
23/04/2012 12:44:08 PM
- 1086 Views
I...actually had a really long post at one point. I don't know where it went
23/04/2012 02:43:25 PM
- 1273 Views
Books by Ruth Brown
20/04/2012 04:26:18 PM
- 958 Views
I loved books like that too. That had little "Easter Eggs" hidden in the pictures ^_^ *NM*
20/04/2012 05:29:50 PM
- 530 Views