Whenever it's pop/entertainment literature and it bores me or the quality puts me off and similar reasons, I do myself the favor of stopping before I lose any more of my time. Life's too short, and leisure time is too short, to accept to be bored by what you pick to entertain yourself, IMO. From time to time (rarely), I give some of those books further tries later, especially series as I know of my "problems" with beginnings (couldn't get through Eye of the World/The Great Hunt or Garden of the Moon for a long time).
For other kinds of literature, those I don't read for entertainment and if it happened to entertain me as well it's a bonus, it happens more rarely. With contemporary writers/new releases more often, but with classics I generally have a good idea what I get into beforehand, and I generally stick to it to the end, though both with non-fiction and literature, it happens a lot that on the way I decide my timing for reading that book just wasn't good, and I postpone reading it for weeks/months/years.
It happened recently with the third Monaldi & Sorti that wasn't grabbing me and that I decided to keep for the summer vacations when I can spend many hours reading at a time (my summers are usually "extreme", that's when I read concurrently the "fluffiest" entertainment stuff I choose to read in the year, and the most "heavy-going" stuff).
For other kinds of literature, those I don't read for entertainment and if it happened to entertain me as well it's a bonus, it happens more rarely. With contemporary writers/new releases more often, but with classics I generally have a good idea what I get into beforehand, and I generally stick to it to the end, though both with non-fiction and literature, it happens a lot that on the way I decide my timing for reading that book just wasn't good, and I postpone reading it for weeks/months/years.
It happened recently with the third Monaldi & Sorti that wasn't grabbing me and that I decided to keep for the summer vacations when I can spend many hours reading at a time (my summers are usually "extreme", that's when I read concurrently the "fluffiest" entertainment stuff I choose to read in the year, and the most "heavy-going" stuff).
Have you ever stopped reading a book because you really don't like it?
31/03/2012 10:47:46 AM
- 1474 Views
Yup. GRRM's stuff *NM*
31/03/2012 02:53:47 PM
- 552 Views
Me too. I tried twice.
31/03/2012 04:18:50 PM
- 1273 Views
i sometimes can't believe i managed to read those books... so much vile stuff in there *NM*
01/04/2012 06:53:50 AM
- 484 Views
I gave The 120 Days of Sodom a try. Yuck.
31/03/2012 03:45:55 PM
- 1155 Views
Many times
31/03/2012 04:12:34 PM
- 1182 Views
More out of boredom than dislike, but there have only been a handful. *NM*
31/03/2012 04:12:32 PM
- 520 Views
yes. mostly when i was in high school... couldn't read erikson, i got to p100 and still didn't care
01/04/2012 06:49:45 AM
- 1127 Views
You can laugh all you want Legolas, but I agree
02/04/2012 06:42:36 PM
- 1086 Views
Reading anything Victorian or older in Dutch translation tends to be a bad idea, agreed.
02/04/2012 10:24:54 PM
- 1071 Views
Of course! All the time!
02/04/2012 11:28:58 PM
- 1143 Views
All the fucking time.
10/04/2012 04:28:13 AM
- 1092 Views