Active Users:764 Time:22/12/2024 09:30:04 PM
Nineteen Eighty-Four is unquestionably Science Fiction. *NM* Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 26/09/2009 04:12:47 AM
And 1984 is Fantasy/SciFi in many schools of thought, because it reimagines events using a theoretical future (and different past) and thus is based in a world mirroring but different from our own. You don't need Knights or Magic to have fantasy, though I class 1984 as SciFi (kind of). Plus there are several other books that are similar, but are very much fantasy. If Watership Down is fantasy, we can argue that Animal Farm is, as well. Mortal Engines is Fantasy/SciFi and has a rather dystopian world. Though to be fair, most books that spring to mind lack pitched battles, so I'm really being pedantic and not relevant to the OP.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins? - 20/09/2009 01:01:18 PM 1235 Views
It's an essential plot device - 20/09/2009 04:41:04 PM 896 Views
Yeah but... - 20/09/2009 07:38:36 PM 861 Views
I don't quite agree - 21/09/2009 01:22:45 AM 803 Views
I'm sitting here trying to think if I've read any books like that... - 21/09/2009 01:40:08 AM 729 Views
Fail. - 21/09/2009 04:43:24 AM 944 Views
Agreed. - 21/09/2009 04:59:39 AM 836 Views
Well there are plenty of authors not in their right minds - 21/09/2009 05:49:22 PM 757 Views
True. - 21/09/2009 06:50:43 PM 835 Views
Re: Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins? - 20/09/2009 08:45:48 PM 1001 Views
That, and... - 20/09/2009 09:08:48 PM 854 Views
Nineteen Eighty-Four, baby! - 20/09/2009 10:37:05 PM 789 Views
That is not even fantasy... - 21/09/2009 12:00:48 AM 787 Views
IT ISN'T?! *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:42:16 AM 334 Views
Yeah, didn't your dad tell you about the double ungood days of the 80s? *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:52:46 AM 324 Views
Doubleplusungood. - 25/09/2009 02:09:27 AM 785 Views
I agree. 1984 is not SF-F. *NM* - 25/09/2009 12:36:46 AM 332 Views
Who knew? ¯\(°O)/¯ *NM* - 25/09/2009 02:07:19 AM 318 Views
I... don't know what those symbols mean. *NM* - 26/09/2009 07:04:13 AM 347 Views
All books should have a point, IMO. Otherwise, what's the point in reading them. - 25/09/2009 04:32:43 PM 867 Views
Nineteen Eighty-Four is unquestionably Science Fiction. *NM* - 26/09/2009 04:12:47 AM 383 Views
Wheel of Time? - 20/09/2009 11:52:36 PM 761 Views
I have not found that to be always true - 21/09/2009 12:52:00 AM 733 Views
The smaller army doesn't always win - 21/09/2009 02:47:07 AM 764 Views
Because you don't have to root for the huge army that's supposed to win. - 21/09/2009 04:38:22 AM 809 Views
everybody loves an under dog *NM* - 21/09/2009 03:51:12 PM 331 Views
Pratchett makes much of this. *NM* - 21/09/2009 04:11:04 PM 353 Views
Exactly what I was going to say - 27/09/2009 02:55:02 PM 851 Views

Reply to Message