Active Users:761 Time:15/01/2026 02:06:49 PM
I agree. I would even go farther than that. Tom Send a noteboard - 01/02/2012 07:59:13 PM
An abridgement implies that the plot is central to the story, when clearly the style, pacing and other elements are important, particularly if we're talking about something that is viewed as a "classic". While plot may indeed be the central point to popular fiction, the whole point of "good literature" is that we don't just enjoy the story, but how it's told.

Of course, if the author agrees to edit down a work and signs off on the edit, then we're in a different situation. At that point the person responsible for the work in question can decide whether an abridgement compromises the integrity of the book as a whole.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Inspired by The Guardian, which books (classic or otherwise) do you think could be shorter? - 30/01/2012 02:10:22 PM 1418 Views
What'll happen if I mention The Count of Monte Cristo? - 30/01/2012 02:25:56 PM 953 Views
LOL - 30/01/2012 04:30:07 PM 1128 Views
- 30/01/2012 05:05:19 PM 951 Views
The Wheel of Time. *NM* - 30/01/2012 02:59:03 PM 491 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 30/01/2012 03:10:23 PM 383 Views
Hmph. *NM* - 30/01/2012 10:05:04 PM 407 Views
Hmph indeed. *NM* - 31/01/2012 05:38:18 PM 408 Views
<3 *NM* - 31/01/2012 06:01:10 PM 371 Views
Exactly. - 30/01/2012 03:26:23 PM 968 Views
I'd really love someone to do a good job of this. - 30/01/2012 04:29:01 PM 926 Views
I don't think Ivanhoe really needs to be pruned - 30/01/2012 03:22:37 PM 972 Views
Mansfield Park needs a jolly good rework. - 30/01/2012 04:34:54 PM 909 Views
In fairness, all Mansfield Park needs to be cut is its heroine... - 30/01/2012 10:34:43 PM 982 Views
War and Peace. That second epilogue really has to go. - 30/01/2012 10:37:28 PM 1066 Views
"Could" be shorter doesn't always mean "should" be shorter. - 31/01/2012 02:18:44 AM 1033 Views
Re: "Could" be shorter doesn't always mean "should" be shorter. - 31/01/2012 04:00:13 AM 1038 Views
I agree. I would even go farther than that. - 01/02/2012 07:59:13 PM 1068 Views
Re: I agree. I would even go farther than that. - 02/02/2012 12:51:45 PM 1138 Views
I don't really think any book should be abridged - 31/01/2012 09:50:34 AM 1043 Views
The Bible. Although I hear it's sort of been abridged before. - 31/01/2012 04:46:28 PM 1006 Views
Why would you cut out Matthew 1? - 31/01/2012 05:11:24 PM 905 Views
Not all of it. - 01/02/2012 04:14:13 PM 1064 Views
The "begats" shouldn't be bypassed at all. - 01/02/2012 08:10:48 PM 896 Views
Tom. Thanks for that information. *NM* - 02/02/2012 02:10:34 PM 498 Views
Everything by Ayn Rand. - 31/01/2012 05:46:11 PM 896 Views
Everything by Thomas Hardy - 02/02/2012 02:27:03 PM 941 Views

Reply to Message